Amiesite Construction Corp. v. Luciano Contracting & Building Co.

259 A.D. 826, 18 N.Y.S.2d 873

Opinions

The assignment to respondent Fiore gave rights to the fund in question which were superior to any acquired by the appellant unless such result was prevented by the Lien Law. (Laws of 1909, chap. 38.) The plaintiff not having filed a lien, the rights that might have accrued thereunder have been lost and it occupies the position of an ordinary creditor. (Edison El. Illuminating Co. v. Frick Co., 221 N. Y. 1; Lee v. Bailey Corporation, 240 App. Div. 65; modfd., 267 N. Y. 161.)

Lazansky, P. J., Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Taylor, J., dissents and, in so far as appealed from, votes to reverse the judgment on the law, with costs, and to direct judgment in favor of plaintiff, except as to the temporary injunction prayed for, with costs, with opinion. Close, J„ concurs with Taylor, J,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amiesite Construction Corp. v. Luciano Contracting & Building Co., 259 A.D. 826, 18 N.Y.S.2d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 826 (Amiesite Construction Corp. v. Luciano Contracting & Building Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. William Bailey Corp.
196 N.E. 9 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Seibert v. . Dunn
110 N.E. 447 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Standard Sand and Gravel Co. v. . the City of New York
121 N.E. 892 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Smith v. . the People
47 N.Y. 330 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.
116 N.E. 869 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Standard Sand & Gravel Co. v. City of New York
172 A.D. 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Lee v. William Bailey Corp.
240 A.D. 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)