Amerson v. United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Colorado
This text of 710 F. App'x 789 (Amerson v. United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Colorado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER AND JUDGMENT **
Plaintiffs-Appellants Frances Moorer Scott and Galen Lemar Amerson appeal from the district court’s judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandamus and dismissing the case with prejudice. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
The petitioners sought an order directing the clerk of the bankruptcy court to transfer that court’s files to the district court for the purpose of a de novo review of certain bankruptcy court orders. The district court viewed the petition as either an untimely attempt to appeal a bankruptcy order (and reconsideration) or a motion to withdraw the reference to the bankruptcy court. The district court also noted that the underlying issues had been resolved against petitioners. See In re Amerson, 839 F.3d 1290 (10th Cir. 2016), cert. denied sub nom. Scott v. King, — U.S. —, 138 S.Ct. 121, 199 L.Ed.2d 185 (2017). For substantially the same reasons, the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
710 F. App'x 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amerson-v-united-states-bankruptcy-court-district-of-colorado-ca10-2018.