AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Penrod
636 F.3d 1175, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3798
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Penrod. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 F.3d 1158 →
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge BEA.
ORDER
Judge W. Fletcher has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Goodwin and Mills so recommend.
A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).
Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, filed August 30, 2010, is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Penrod, 636 F.3d 1175, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3798 (9th Cir. 2011).
636 F.3d 1175 (AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Penrod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Dale (In Re Dale)
582 F.3d 568 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
In Re Graupner
537 F.3d 1295 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Butner v. United States
440 U.S. 48 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Ford v. Ford Motor Credit Corp.
574 F.3d 1279 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
In Re Price
562 F.3d 618 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
In Re Peaslee
585 F.3d 53 (Second Circuit, 2009)
In Re Howard
597 F.3d 852 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)
Nuvell Credit Corp. v. Westfall
599 F.3d 498 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
In Re Vinson
391 B.R. 754 (D. South Carolina, 2008)
Americredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Penrod
611 F.3d 1158 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)