Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Transocean Tankers Corp.

317 F. Supp. 798, 1970 A.M.C. 422
CourtDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico
DecidedDecember 4, 1969
DocketCiv. No. 346-68
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 317 F. Supp. 798 (Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Transocean Tankers Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Transocean Tankers Corp., 317 F. Supp. 798, 1970 A.M.C. 422 (prd 1969).

Opinion

ORDER

FERN ANDEZ-B ADILLO, District Judge.

This action is presently before the Court upon the Motion of defendant The London Steamship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited to Strike plaintiff’s demand for trial by jury. Said motion came on for hearing on July 19, 1968 and the parties were granted 30 days to file simultaneous memoranda after which the matter would stand submitted. The requested briefs in support and opposition to the trial by jury demand were not filed until November 28, 1969.

Having considered the arguments set forth therein, the allegations contained in the complaint and otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court concludes that this action arises out of a maritime tort. The complaint has been labelled “In Tort, Including Maritime Tort.” The Court’s jurisdiction is founded on diversity and jurisdictional amount, and alternatively, on the admiralty and maritime nature of the claim. There is no doubt that plaintiff, through the allegations of its complaint has clearly chosen to assert and identify its claim for relief as an admiralty or maritime claim within the meaning of Rule 9(h), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having identified it as such, under federal Rule 38(e) plaintiff does not have the right to trial by jury.

Therefore, it is hereby ordered that the Motion of defendant insurer to Strike plaintiff’s demand for jury trial filed on July 12, 1968 be and the same is hereby granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miles v. M/V HANSA CALEDONIA
245 F. Supp. 2d 1261 (S.D. Georgia, 2002)
Matter of Armatur, Sa
710 F. Supp. 404 (D. Puerto Rico, 1989)
Siragusa v. Standard Steamship Owners Protection
710 F. Supp. 404 (D. Puerto Rico, 1989)
Natasha, Inc. v. Evita Marine Charters, Inc.
763 F.2d 468 (First Circuit, 1985)
Gilmore v. Witschorek
411 F. Supp. 491 (E.D. Illinois, 1976)
Romero v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
368 F. Supp. 890 (E.D. Texas, 1974)
Anderson v. American Oil Co.
60 F.R.D. 676 (S.D. Georgia, 1973)
Williams v. Shipping Corporation of India, Ltd.
354 F. Supp. 626 (S.D. Georgia, 1973)
Alaska Barite Co. v. Freighters Inc.
54 F.R.D. 192 (N.D. California, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
317 F. Supp. 798, 1970 A.M.C. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/americana-of-puerto-rico-inc-v-transocean-tankers-corp-prd-1969.