American Water Softener Co. v. Lankford

235 U.S. 496, 35 S. Ct. 184, 59 L. Ed. 329, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1836
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 5, 1915
Docket418
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 235 U.S. 496 (American Water Softener Co. v. Lankford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Water Softener Co. v. Lankford, 235 U.S. 496, 35 S. Ct. 184, 59 L. Ed. 329, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1836 (1915).

Opinions

Mr, Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant, on June 8,1912, deposited with the Farmers’ and Merchants’ Bank of Sapulpa the sum of $3,337.50. The bank issued to appellant a certificate of deposit for the sum in the usual form.

The bank, which, it is alleged, was entitled to the benefits of the Oklahoma bank guaranty law, subsequently failed and was closed and taken possession of by appellees, composing the State Banking Board. The certificate of deposit was presented to the Banking Board and payment demanded out of the Depositors’ Guaranty Fund or, if that fund should be insufficient, that there be issued to appellant a certificate of deposit. Both demands were refused and this suit was instituted to enjoin compliance with one or the other of the demands.

Motion was made by appellees to dismiss the bill on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action or of the persons of the defendants (appellees), the suit being one against the State of Oklahoma without its consent in violation of the provisions of the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

The motion was granted on the authority of the court’s opinion in Farish v. State Banking Board.

This appeal was then prosecuted.

The questions in this case are the same as those discussed and decided this day in Lankford, et al., Composing the State Banking Board, v. Platte Iron Works Company, [498]*498ante, p. 461, and on the authority of that case the decree in this is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
465 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Hertz v. Knudson
6 F.2d 812 (Eighth Circuit, 1925)
American Water Softener Co. v. Lankford
235 U.S. 496 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 U.S. 496, 35 S. Ct. 184, 59 L. Ed. 329, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-water-softener-co-v-lankford-scotus-1915.