American Pacific Mortgage Corporation v. Everett Financial Inc
This text of American Pacific Mortgage Corporation v. Everett Financial Inc (American Pacific Mortgage Corporation v. Everett Financial Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 HONORABLE TIFFANY M. CARTWRIGHT 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 AMERICAN PACIFIC MORTGAGE Case No. 2:21-cv-1088-TMC CORPORATION, a California corporation; and 10 | ELEMENT MORTGAGE, a division of JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE 11 | AMERICAN PACIFIC MORTGAGE TO AMEND PLAINTIFEF’S CORPORATION COMPLAINT and ORDER 2 Plaintiff, TRIAL DATE: — January 17, 2023 13 ACTION FILED: August 13, 2021 vs. 14 EVERETT FINANCIAL, INC. d/b/a SUPREME 15 LENDING; LUKE WELLING, an individual residing in Washington State; MATTHEW 16 THOMAS, an individual residing in Washington State; ANDREW HOPKINS, an individual 17 residing in Washington State; AUSTIN JAMES, an individual residing in Washington State; 18 COREY CONDRIN, an individual residing in 19 Washington State; DANIEL WON, an individual residing in Washington State; KIMBERLY 0 BUNDRUM, an individual residing in Washington State; CINDEE WILSON, an 21 individual residing in Washington State; JANE/JOHN DOES 1-10; DOE 22 BUSINESS/CORPORATE ENTITIES 1-10, 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27
| Page 1 —- JOINT STIPULATION FOR MEDINA McKELVEY LLP MCKELVEY LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S 925 Highland Pointe Drive. Suite 300
1} 1. INTRODUCTION 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) and LCR 15, Plaintiff and Defendants 3 || by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff be given 4 | leave of the Court to amend the complaint filed herein and the FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 5 | FOR DAMAGES AND JURY TRIAL, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be filed within sixteen 6 || days of this stipulation being granted by the court. 7 | OL BACKGROUND 8 Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on August 13, 2021 and subsequently served the Summons and 9 | Complaint on multiple Defendants. Subsequently, the court granted a motion to compel arbitration 10 || as to all the defendants, except for Supreme Lending and Luke Welling, and imposed a stay on the 11 | litigation until arbitration had concluded, sending the remaining defendants to arbitration. During 12 | arbitration, Plaintiff learned more facts pertaining to its claims, and determined to narrow its claims 13 || and parties, ultimately dismissing all of the defendants except for Supreme Lending and Luke 14 || Welling. The parties now stipulate and agree to amend Plaintiff's Complaint as reflected in the 15 || attached exhibit. 16 | TT. ARGUMENT 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) allows for the amendment of pleadings with leave 18 || of the court, or with opposing counsel’s written consent, before trial. The Rule further provides 19 || that “the court should freely give leave when Justice so requires.” Jd. 20 The Ninth Circuit has instructed that this rule “should be interpreted with ‘extreme 21 || liberality,’” Jackson v. Bank of Hawaii, 902 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1990) (quoting United States 22 | v. Webb, 655 F.2d 977, 979 (9th Cir. 1981)), and “[a]n outright refusal to grant leave to amend 23 || without a justifying reason is... an abuse of discretion.” Smith v. Constellation Brands, Inc., 2018 24 || WL 991450, at *2 (9th Cir. Feb. 21, 2018) (quoting Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music Publ’g, 512 25 || F.3d 522, 532 (9th Cir. 2008)). A district court only has discretion to deny leave to amend “‘due 26 || to... repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to 27 | the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and] futility of amendment.’” Jd. at
9g | *2 (quoting Zucco Partners, LLC vy. Digimarc Corp., 52 F.3d 981, 1007 (9th Cir. 2009) and “| PRgg2=OINT STIPULATION FOR MEDINA MeKELVEY LP
1 | Leadsinger, Inc., 512 F.3d at 532). An amendment to a pleading relates back to the date of the 2 | original pleading when the amendment changes the party against whom a claim is asserted if the 3 || amendment asserts a claim that arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out (or 4 | attempted to be set out) in the original pleading. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(1)(B). 5 | IV. CONCLUSION 6 For these reasons, the parties respectfully seek the court’s approval of this stipulation and 7 | allow Plaintiff to file the attached amended complaint within sixteen days of this stipulation being 8 | granted. 9 || Dated this 4th day of October, 2023. 10 11 MEDINA MCKELVEY, LLP DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 12 By: s/ Rabindra M. David By: s/F. Matthew Ralph 13 Rabindra M. David (Pro Hac Vice) F. Matthew Ralph (Pro Hac Vice) 14 Alexander M. Medina (Pro Hac Vice) ralph.matthew@dorsey.com alex@medinamckelvey.com Marina Lyons (WSBA No. 49127) lyons.marina@dorsey.com 15 with 16 Attorneys for Defendants 17 LINDSAY HART, LLP Tyson L. Calvert (WSBA No. 38908) 18 tcalvert@lindsayhart.com 19 and 20 71 Maren L. Calvert (WSBA No. 53940) 2 mealvert@schwabe.com SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & 23 WYATT 700 Washington St Ste 701 24 Vancouver, WA 98660-3338 25 Telephone: (360) 597-0804 2% Attorneys for Plaintiff American Pacific Mortgage Corp. 27
| Page 3 — JOINT STIPULATION FOR MEDINA McKELVEY LLP MCKELVEY LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S 925 Highland Pointe Drive. Suite 300
1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties in this matter, Plaintiff is granted leave to amend 3 || its Complaint. Plaintiff must file and serve the amended pleading on all parties within sixteen 4 | days of the filing of this order. 5 6 Dated this 4th day of October, 2023, at Seattle, Washington. 7 Low CC 8 Tiffany M. Cartwright 9 United States District Court Judge 10 1] 12 13 || Presented and submitted by: 14 | _/s/ Rabindra M. David Rabindra M. David (CA SBN 274504) 15 | Admitted pro hac vice 16 rabi@medinamckelvey.com MEDINA McKELVEY LLP 17 | 925 Highland Pointe Drive, Suite 300 Roseville, California 95678 18 || Telephone: (916) 960-2211 Facsimile: (916) 742-5488 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
| Page 4-— JOINT STIPULATION FOR MEDINA McKELVEY LLP MCKELVEY LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S 925 Highland Pointe Drive. Suite 300
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
American Pacific Mortgage Corporation v. Everett Financial Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-pacific-mortgage-corporation-v-everett-financial-inc-wawd-2023.