American Oil Co. v. Metz

282 U.S. 801, 51 S. Ct. 40, 75 L. Ed. 720, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 33
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 20, 1930·No. No. 256·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

On consideration of the motion of the appellee, the Cumberland and Westernport Transit Company, to dismiss the appeal herein, it is ordered that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Oil Co. v. Metz, 282 U.S. 801, 51 S. Ct. 40, 75 L. Ed. 720, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 33 (1930).

282 U.S. 801 (American Oil Co. v. Metz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warren v. State
882 A.2d 934 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2005)
Johnson v. State
632 A.2d 152 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1993)
Opinion Number
Louisiana Attorney General Reports, 1993
Watkins v. State
613 A.2d 379 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1992)
Market Tavern, Inc. v. Bowen
610 A.2d 295 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1992)
Smallwood v. State
577 A.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
Sims v. State
573 A.2d 1317 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of America
628 F.2d 187 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Marks v. Frantz
325 P.2d 368 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1958)
Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service
8 So. 2d 49 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)
Brinkley v. Hassig
83 F.2d 351 (Tenth Circuit, 1936)