American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 890, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1864
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 11, 1967
DocketNo. P67/161; protests 64/15105, etc. (Honolulu)
StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 890 (American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 890, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1864 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of Samen and similar styled alimentary pastes containing eggs or egg products similar in all material respects to those the subject of Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd., et al. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 277, C.D. 2544), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of Ramen and similar styled alimentary pastes, not containing eggs or egg products similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shirokiya, Incorporated, and American Customs Brokerage Company v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 463, Abstract 69374), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 277 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)
Shirokiya, Inc. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 463 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cust. Ct. 890, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-customs-brokerage-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.