Home/U.S. Customs Court/American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States

American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 890, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1864
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 Cust. Ct. 23 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 11, 1967·No. No. P67/161; protests 64/15105, etc. (Honolulu)·Published

Opinion

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of Samen and similar styled alimentary pastes containing eggs or egg products similar in all material respects to those the subject of Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd., et al. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 277, C.D. 2544), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of Ramen and similar styled alimentary pastes, not containing eggs or egg products similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shirokiya, Incorporated, and American Customs Brokerage Company v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 463, Abstract 69374), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 890, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1864 (cusc 1967).

58 Cust. Ct. 890 (American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 277 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)
Shirokiya, Inc. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 463 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)