American Condiments Co. v. Audit Co.

149 N.Y.S. 451
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in American Condiments Co. v. Audit Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 164 A.D. 927
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1914·No. No. 6168·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant is entitled to the particulars demanded in the first six paragraphs of the moving affidavits. It is not [452]*452an answer to this demand that defendant should know as much about the matter complained of as does the plaintiff. The defendant is entitled to be informed what specific facts are claimed by the plaintiff to be covered by the general allegations of the complaint, to the end that the issues to be tried may be limited and defined. Havholm v. Whale Creek Iron Works, 159 App. Div. 578, 144 N. Y. Supp. 833.

Order appealed from reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Condiments Co. v. Audit Co., 149 N.Y.S. 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

149 N.Y.S. 451 (American Condiments Co. v. Audit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Havholm v. Whale Creek Iron Works
159 A.D. 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)