American Condiments Co. v. Audit Co.

164 A.D. 927
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The defendant is entitled to the particulars demanded in the first six paragraphs of the moving affidavits. It is not an answer to [928]*928this demand that defendant ¡should know as much about the matter complained of as does the plaintiff. The defendant is entitled to be informed what specific facts are claimed by the plaintiff to be covered by the general allegations of the complaint to the end that the issues to be tried may be limited and defined. (Havholm v. Whale Creek Iron Works, 159 App. Div. 578.) The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent indicated. Pesent — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent indicated in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American Condiments Co. v. Audit Co., 164 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

164 A.D. 927 (American Condiments Co. v. Audit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Price Fireplace Heater & Tank Corp. v. State
205 Misc. 168 (New York State Court of Claims, 1954)