American Can Co. v. Funkhouser
260 U.S. 722, 43 S. Ct. 12, 67 L. Ed. 481, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2651
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 9, 1922·No. No. 411; No. 412; No. 413; No. 414; No. 415; No. 416; No. 417·Published·Cited by 22 cases
Opinion
Petitions for writs of certiorari- to .the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
American Can Co. v. Funkhouser, 260 U.S. 722, 43 S. Ct. 12, 67 L. Ed. 481, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2651 (1922).
260 U.S. 722 (American Can Co. v. Funkhouser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Franklin D. Wilson and Gary Wayne Bugbee
578 F.2d 67 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Culver
224 F. Supp. 419 (D. Maryland, 1963)
Carlos Garza De Luna v. United States
308 F.2d 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
United States v. Greenberg
30 F.R.D. 164 (S.D. New York, 1962)
Grand River Dam Authority, a Public Corporation and an Agency of the State of Oklahoma v. Federal Power Commission
246 F.2d 453 (Tenth Circuit, 1957)
William Rickey v. United States
242 F.2d 583 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
Clayton v. Canida
223 S.W.2d 264 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1949)
United States v. Haynes
81 F. Supp. 63 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1949)
Schwartz v. Westbrook
154 F.2d 854 (D.C. Circuit, 1946)
United States v. Rosenberg
145 F.2d 653 (Second Circuit, 1944)
Blackwood v. United States
138 F.2d 461 (Eighth Circuit, 1943)
United States v. Atlantic Commission Co.
45 F. Supp. 187 (E.D. North Carolina, 1942)
United States v. Sussman
37 F. Supp. 294 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1941)
Taylor v. United States
96 F.2d 16 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)
Hass v. United States
93 F.2d 427 (Eighth Circuit, 1937)
State of Washington v. United States
87 F.2d 421 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
State v. United States
87 F.2d 421 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
Rodman v. Richfield Oil Co. of California
66 F.2d 244 (Ninth Circuit, 1933)
United States v. Radice
40 F.2d 445 (Second Circuit, 1930)
Barron v. United States
5 F.2d 799 (First Circuit, 1925)