Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines

660 So. 2d 1374, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 490, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1555, 1995 WL 555322
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1995
DocketNo. 85929
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 660 So. 2d 1374 (Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines, 660 So. 2d 1374, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 490, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1555, 1995 WL 555322 (Fla. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Sentencing Guidelines Commission (the “Commission”) petitions this Court to adopt proposed Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.703 and 3.991 to implement statutory revisions made during the 1995 legislative session. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The legislature in chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, changed the 1994 sentencing guidelines to resolve problems that had arisen in application of those guidelines and to enhance the punishment for certain crimes. The Department of Corrections, in response to legislative directive, drafted and submitted to the Commission a proposed rule of procedure and revised scoresheet reflecting the statutory changes. The proposed rule and scoresheet were approved by the Commission and published in The Florida Bar News, August 1, 1995; comments were invited. Two comments were received and several technical changes were made in the proposed rule as a result.

The proposed rule and scoresheet accomplish the following: They set forth the circumstances under which one or more score-sheets are to be used; they clarify which version of the guidelines is to be used for a particular crime; they reflect enhanced punishment by reclassifying certain felonies and adding points for others; and they create a multiplier for grand theft of the third degree involving a motor vehicle.

We hereby adopt new rules 3.703 and 3.991 as appended to this opinion. These rules are effective October 1, 1995.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 3.703 SENTENCING GUIDELINES (1994 as amended in 1995)

(a) Use. This rule is to be used in conjunction with the forms located at rule 3.991. This rule implements the 1994 sentencing guidelines, as amended in 1995, in strict accordance with chapter 921, Florida Statutes, as revised by chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida. This rule applies to offenses committed on or after October 1, 1995.

(b) Purpose and Construction. The purpose of the 1994 sentencing guidelines and the principles they embody are set out in subsection 921.001(4). Existing caselaw construing the application of sentencing guidelines that is in conflict with the provisions of this rule or the statement of purpose or the principles embodied by the 1994 sentencing [1375]*1375guidelines set out in subsection 921.001(4) is superseded by the operation of this rule.

(c) Offense Severity Ranking. Felony offenses subject to the 1994 sentencing guidelines, as amended, are listed in a single offense severity ranking chart located at section 921.0012. The offense severity ranking chart employs 10 offense levels, ranked from least severe to most severe. Each felony offense is assigned to a level according to the severity of the offense, commensurate with the harm or potential for harm to the community that is caused by the offense. Felony offenses not listed in section 921.0012 are to be assigned a severity level in accordance with 921.0013, as follows:

(1) A felony of the third degree within offense level 1.
(2) A felony of the second degree within offense level 4.
(3) A felony of the first degree within offense level 7.
(4) A felony of the first degree punishable by life within offense level 9.
(5) A life felony within offense level 10.

(d) General Rules and Definitions.

(1) One or more sentencing guidelines scoresheets shall be prepared for each offender covering all offenses pending before the court for sentencing, including offenses for which the offender has been adjudicated an habitual felony offender, an habitual violent felony offender or violent career criminal. The office of the state attorney or the Department of Corrections, or both where appropriate, will prepare the scoresheets and present them to defense counsel for review as to accuracy. The Department of Corrections shall prepare sentencing guidelines scoresheets if the offender is alleged to have violated probation or community control and revocation is recommended.

(2) One scoresheet shall be prepared for all offenses committed under any single version or revision of the guidelines, pending before the court for sentencing.

(3) If an offender is before the court for sentencing for more than one felony and the felonies were committed under more than one version or revision of the guidelines, separate scoresheets must be prepared and used at sentencing. The sentencing court may impose such sentence concurrently or consecutively.

(4) The sentencing judge shall review the scoresheet for accuracy and sign it.

(5) Felonies, except capital felonies, with continuing dates of enterprise are to be sentenced under the guidelines in effect on the beginning date of the criminal activity.

(6) “Conviction” means a determination of guilt resulting from plea or trial, regardless of whether adjudication was withheld or whether imposition of sentence was suspended.

(7) “Primary offense” is the offense pending for sentencing that results in the highest number of total sentence points. Only one offense may be scored as the primary offense.

(8) “Additional offense” is any offense, other than the primary offense, pending before the court for sentencing. Sentence points for additional offenses are determined by the severity level and the number of offenses at a particular severity level. Misdemeanors are scored at level “M” regardless of degree.

(9) “Victim injury” is scored for physical injury or death suffered by a person as a direct result of any offense pending before the court for sentencing. Sexual penetration points are scored if an offense pending before the court for sentencing involves sexual penetration. Sexual contact points are scored if an offense pending before the court for sentencing involves sexual contact, but no penetration. If the victim of an offense involving sexual penetration or sexual contact without penetration suffers any physical injury as a direct result of an offense pending before the court for sentencing, that physical injury is to be scored in addition to any points scored for the sexual contact or sexual penetration.

Victim injury shall be scored for each victim physically injured and for each offense resulting in physical injury whether there are one or more victims. However, victim injury shall not be scored for an offense for which the offender has not been convicted.

[1376]*1376Victim injury resultant from one or more capital felonies before the court for sentencing is not to be included upon any scoresheet prepared for non-capital felonies also pending before the court for sentencing. This in no way prohibits the scoring of victim injury as a result from the non-capital felonies before the court for sentencing.

(10) Unless specifically provided otherwise by statute, attempts, conspiracies, and solicitations are indicated in the space provided on the guidelines scoresheet and are scored at one severity level below the completed offense.

Attempts, solicitations, and conspiracies of third-degree felonies located in offense severity levels 1 and 2 are to be scored as misdemeanors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
888 So. 2d 759 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Seccia v. State
786 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Lowe v. State
742 So. 2d 350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Greene v. State
714 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Sailor v. State
701 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 So. 2d 1374, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 490, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1555, 1995 WL 555322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amendments-to-florida-rules-of-criminal-procedure-re-sentencing-guidelines-fla-1995.