Amell v. State

319 So. 2d 621, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15353
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1975·No. No. 74-1151·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of two counts of robbery and sentenced by the trial court to two consecutive life terms which were later modified to two concurrent life terms.

Appellant has appealed the judgment and sentences. The several grounds relied on by the appellant for reversal have been considered by us in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and we find no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, that the verdict is supported by the evidence and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not on the record and under the law constitute harmful error.

Therefore the judgment and sentences appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amell v. State, 319 So. 2d 621, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

319 So. 2d 621 (Amell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. State
502 So. 2d 18 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Amell v. State
344 So. 2d 944 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)