Ambler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ambler v. State

230 S.W.3d 85, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1118, 2007 WL 2306945

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 14, 2007

DocketWD 66979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 S.W.3d 85 (Ambler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambler v. State, 230 S.W.3d 85, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1118, 2007 WL 2306945 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Ambler appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Ambler pled guilty to one count of sodomy, three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and one count of assault in the third degree. Ambler claimed his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate his work history. As Ambler failed to meet his burden of proof on his claims, the motion court did not clearly err in denying Ambler’s motion seeking post-conviction relief. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Ambler appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Ambler pled guilty to one count of sodomy, three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and one count of assault in the third degree. Ambler claimed his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate his work history. As Ambler failed to meet his burden of proof on his claims, the motion court did not clearly err in denying Ambler’s motion seeking post-conviction relief. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.W.3d 85, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1118, 2007 WL 2306945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambler-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack