Ambler v. State
230 S.W.3d 85, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1118, 2007 WL 2306945
Opinion
ORDER
Steven Ambler appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Ambler pled guilty to one count of sodomy, three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and one count of assault in the third degree. Ambler claimed his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate his work history. As Ambler failed to meet his burden of proof on his claims, the motion court did not clearly err in denying Ambler’s motion seeking post-conviction relief. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ambler v. State, 230 S.W.3d 85, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1118, 2007 WL 2306945 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
230 S.W.3d 85 (Ambler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bell v. State
230 S.W.3d 85 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)