Amato v. Department of the Army

Federal Circuit

Amato v. Department of the Army

177 F. App'x 71

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2006

DocketNo. 06-3096

StatusPublished

This text of 177 F. App'x 71 (Amato v. Department of the Army) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amato v. Department of the Army, 177 F. App'x 71 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2006 WL 994631.

Petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, and having filed the required brief, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

The respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2006 WL 994631.

Petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, and having filed the required brief, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

The respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of filing of this order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 F. App'x 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amato-v-department-of-the-army-cafc-2006.