Amalgamated Transit Union v. United States

385 U.S. 38, 17 L. Ed. 2d 35, 87 S. Ct. 240, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 313, 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2371
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 7, 1966·No. No. 496·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amalgamated Transit Union v. United States, 385 U.S. 38, 17 L. Ed. 2d 35, 87 S. Ct. 240, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 313, 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2371 (1966).

385 U.S. 38 (Amalgamated Transit Union v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Live Concert Antitrust Litigation
247 F.R.D. 98 (C.D. California, 2007)
United States v. Gillette Co.
828 F. Supp. 78 (District of Columbia, 1993)
Haagen-Dazs Co. v. Double Rainbow Gourmet Ice Creams, Inc.
691 F. Supp. 1262 (N.D. California, 1988)
In Re Super Prem. Ice Cream Distrib. Antitrust Lit.
691 F. Supp. 1262 (N.D. California, 1988)
Casey v. Diet Center, Inc.
590 F. Supp. 1561 (N.D. California, 1984)
JBL Enterprises, Inc. v. Jhirmack Enterprises, Inc.
509 F. Supp. 357 (N.D. California, 1981)
United States v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.
430 F. Supp. 729 (D. Maryland, 1976)
United States v. Phillips Petroleum Company
367 F. Supp. 1226 (C.D. California, 1973)
Ricchetti v. Meister Brau, Inc.
431 F.2d 1211 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Ricchetti v. Meister Brau
431 F.2d 1211 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. United States
272 F. Supp. 304 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1967)
Transit Union v. United States
385 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1967)