Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry., and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 1127, Etc. v. Southern Bus Lines, Inc. (Two Cases)

201 F.2d 53
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 1953
Docket13940_1
StatusPublished

This text of 201 F.2d 53 (Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry., and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 1127, Etc. v. Southern Bus Lines, Inc. (Two Cases)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry., and Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 1127, Etc. v. Southern Bus Lines, Inc. (Two Cases), 201 F.2d 53 (5th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

201 F.2d 53

AMALGAMATED ASS'N OF STREET, ELECTRIC RY., AND MOTOR COACH EMPLOYEES OF AMERICA, DIVISION NO. 1127, etc., et al.,
v.
SOUTHERN BUS LINES, Inc. (two cases).

No. 13939.

No. 13940.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

January 14, 1953.

Evelyn Hunt Conner, Bay St. Louis, Miss., L. Barrett Jones, Jackson, Miss., Ben Stevens, Hattiesburg, Miss., for appellants.

Robert C. Cannada, Jackson, Miss., Grove Stafford, Alexandria, La., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

When these two cases were here before, the appeals were from judgments dismissing the complaints on the merits for failure to state a cause of action.

Of the opinion that they should have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, this court reversed the judgments and remanded the causes, with specific directions to dismiss them for want of jurisdiction.1

This time the appeals are from judgments entered not only in accordance with the law of the state as established on the former appeals, but in execution of, and in precise accord with, our mandates.

In such circumstances, unlike where judgments of reversal are general, appeals from the judgments entered on the mandates present nothing for our review. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed.2

Notes:

1

5 Cir., 189 F.2d 219, at page 222

2

28 U.S.C.A. § 2106, note 390; Merrill v. National Bank, 5 Cir., 78 F. 208, and cases cited; Singer Mfg. v. Adams, 5 Cir., 185 F. 768; Seagraves v. Wallace, 5 Cir., 69 F.2d 163, at page 164

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 F.2d 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amalgamated-assn-of-street-electric-ry-and-motor-coach-employees-of-ca5-1953.