Amaker v. King County

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amaker v. King County. Read the opinion of the Court — 540 F.3d 1012
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 25, 2009·No. 07-35241·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBINETTE AMAKER,  No. 07-35241 Plaintiff-Appellant,

D.C. No.

v.

CV-05-01470-MJP

KING COUNTY, a municipal  Western District of corporation; STANLEY MEDICAL Washington, RESEARCH INSTITUTE, a foreign Seattle corporation; E. FULLER TORREY, ORDER

Defendants-Appellees.

Filed March 25, 2009

Before: Richard R. Clifton and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Brian E. Sandoval,* District Judge.

ORDER

Stipulated Motion to Withdraw Certification and for Dismissal of Appeal, filed March 9, 2009, is GRANTED.

The copy of this order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court.

*The Honorable Brian E. Sandoval, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amaker v. King County, (9th Cir. 2009).

Amaker v. King County (Amaker v. King County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.