Amaker v. King County
This text of 560 F.3d 1027 (Amaker v. King County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robinette AMAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KING COUNTY, a municipal corporation; Stanley Medical Research Institute, a foreign corporation; E. Fuller Torrey, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Stephen L. Bulzomi, Esquire, John R. Christensen, Esquire, Jeremy Adam Johnston, Esquire, Messina Bulzomi Christensen, Tacoma, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
June K. Campbell, Grant S. Degginger, Lane Powell, PC, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: RICHARD R. CLIFTON and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges, and BRIAN E. SANDOVAL,[*] District Judge.
ORDER
Stipulated Motion to Withdraw Certification and for Dismissal of Appeal, filed March 9, 2009, is GRANTED.
The copy of this order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court.
NOTES
[*] The Honorable Brian E. Sandoval, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
560 F.3d 1027, 2009 WL 764722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amaker-v-king-county-ca9-2009.