Home/Supreme Court/Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Ntsebeza

Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Ntsebeza

128 S. Ct. 2424, 553 U.S. 1028, 171 L. Ed. 2d 225, 76 U.S.L.W. 3608, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 3868
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 12, 2008
Docket07-919
StatusPublished
Cited by39 cases

This text of 128 S. Ct. 2424 (Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Ntsebeza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Ntsebeza, 128 S. Ct. 2424, 553 U.S. 1028, 171 L. Ed. 2d 225, 76 U.S.L.W. 3608, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 3868 (U.S. 2008).

Opinion

(2008)

AM. ISUZU MOTORS, INC., ET AL.
v.
LUNGISILE NTSEBEZA, ET AL.

No. 07-919

Supreme Court of United States.

May 12, 2008.

Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. §1, and since a majority of the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. §2109, which provides that under these circumstances the Court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided Court. The Chief Justice, Justice Kennedy, Justice Breyer, and Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weisberg v. Yellen
D. Connecticut, 2024
Doe I v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
73 F.4th 700 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
Owens v. Taliban
S.D. New York, 2022
Appel v. Hayut
S.D. New York, 2021
Chien v. Barron
Second Circuit, 2020
John Doe v. Nestle, S.A.
929 F.3d 623 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Commonwealth v. Barnes
167 A.3d 110 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Veracode, Inc. v. Appthority, Inc.
137 F. Supp. 3d 17 (D. Massachusetts, 2015)
Chowdhury v. Worldtel Bangladesh Holding, Ltd.
746 F.3d 42 (Second Circuit, 2014)
Balintulo v. Daimler AG
727 F.3d 174 (Second Circuit, 2013)
Sampson v. United States
724 F.3d 150 (First Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Johnson
900 F. Supp. 2d 949 (N.D. Iowa, 2012)
United States v. Arthur Anderson
458 F. App'x 440 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
State v. Rizzo
31 A.3d 1094 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC
671 F.3d 736 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Sampson
820 F. Supp. 2d 202 (D. Massachusetts, 2011)
Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc.
658 F.3d 388 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.
811 F. Supp. 2d 841 (S.D. New York, 2011)
State v. Hess
23 A.3d 373 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)
Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
654 F.3d 11 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S. Ct. 2424, 553 U.S. 1028, 171 L. Ed. 2d 225, 76 U.S.L.W. 3608, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 3868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/am-isuzu-motors-inc-v-ntsebeza-scotus-2008.