Alvin Viani Freeman v. State of Florida
This text of Alvin Viani Freeman v. State of Florida (Alvin Viani Freeman v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-1454 Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CF-1 _____________________________
ALVIN VIANI FREEMAN,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hendry County. James D. Sloan, Judge.
August 8, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Alvin Freeman appeals the trial court’s revocation of his probation and
challenges the denial of his motion to suppress. Freeman also raises what he deems
to be a scrivener’s error in the probation revocation order. We find no error in the
denial of Freeman’s motion to suppress and therefore affirm. We decline to reach
the merits of Freeman’s additional claim that the revocation order contains a
scrivener’s error because that claim is not preserved for our review and does not
constitute fundamental error. See Thomas v. State, 725 So. 2d 1148, 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (citing § 924.051, Fla. Stat. (1996)), approved, 763 So. 2d 316 (Fla.
2000).
AFFIRMED.
STARGEL, NARDELLA and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William A. Leto, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alvin Viani Freeman v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvin-viani-freeman-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.