Alvarez v. Vingsan Ltd. Partnership

2017 NY Slip Op 4240, 150 A.D.3d 1176, 52 N.Y.S.3d 868
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 31, 2017
Docket2015-03511
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4240 (Alvarez v. Vingsan Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvarez v. Vingsan Ltd. Partnership, 2017 NY Slip Op 4240, 150 A.D.3d 1176, 52 N.Y.S.3d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff Franklin G.S. Alvarez, and separate cross appeals by the defendant Vingsan Limited Partnership and the defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Janice A. Taylor, J.), entered January 8, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) for failure to annex a copy of the pleadings. The order, insofar as cross-appealed from by the defendant Vingsan Limited Partnership, denied those branches of that defendant’s motion which were for summary *1177 judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1), and 241 (6), and common-law negligence insofar as asserted against it and for summary judgment on its cross claim for contractual indemnification against the defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., on the ground that the supporting affidavit did not contain a jurat. The order, insofar as cross-appealed from by the defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., denied that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to annex a copy of the pleadings.

Ordered that the appeal and cross appeals are dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal and cross appeals from the order entered January 8, 2015, must be dismissed, as that order was vacated by a subsequent order dated November 16, 2015, made upon re-argument (see Alvarez v Vingsan L.P., 150 AD3d 1177 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]).

Dillon, J.P., Cohen, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. Vingsan Ltd. Partnership
2017 NY Slip Op 4241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 4240, 150 A.D.3d 1176, 52 N.Y.S.3d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-vingsan-ltd-partnership-nyappdiv-2017.