Alvarez v. State

527 So. 2d 913, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1528, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2686, 1988 WL 65185
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alvarez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2460
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 1988·No. No. 87-1016·Published

Opinion

WARREN H. COBB, Associate Judge.

The defendant, Julio Alvarez, was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell. At trial the prosecutor, in the presence of the jury, asked that the defendant take the stand during the state’s casein-chief. It was the prosecutor’s contention that a reference by defense counsel during cross-examination of a state witness to a scar on the defendant’s face constituted non-verbal testimony, thereby waiving the defendant’s right against self-incrimination. The defense unsuccessfully moved for a mistrial.

Clearly, the prosecutor tried to compel testimony from the accused in rank violation of the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution. Cf. Macias v. State, 515 So.2d 206 (Fla.1987). Under the facts of the instant case, denial of the motion for mistrial cannot be deemed harmless error. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

[914]*914REVERSED and REMANDED for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. State, 527 So. 2d 913, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1528, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2686, 1988 WL 65185 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

527 So. 2d 913 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
MacIas v. State
515 So. 2d 206 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)