Alvarez v. State

525 So. 2d 946, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1106, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4237, 1988 WL 45253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alvarez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2460
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 11, 1988·No. No. 4-86-3040·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and withdraw our opinion filed October 14,1987. We substitute the following opinion.

This court directed the parties to file supplemental briefs after appellant demonstrated in his motion for rehearing that his appellate counsel was not furnished with a copy of the trial court’s written reasons for departure. We affirm appellant’s conviction; however, we find merit in appellant’s argument that the trial court erred when it departed from the recommended guidelines sentence. The trial court’s sentencing order contains six findings which appear to furnish the basis for departure from the sentencing guidelines. We hold that none of the findings constitutes a valid reason for aggravation of appellant’s sentence. We specifically note that the quantity of drugs involved in a crime is not a valid reason for departure. Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla.1988).1

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of a fifteen year sentence, the minimum mandatory sentence required by section 893.135(l)(b)(3) Florida Statutes (1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. State, 525 So. 2d 946, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1106, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4237, 1988 WL 45253 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

525 So. 2d 946 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atwaters v. State
519 So. 2d 611 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Pastor v. State
498 So. 2d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)