Alvarez v. State

445 So. 2d 677, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11852
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 1984·No. No. 83-681·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for attempted first degree murder but reverse his conviction for possession of a firearm while engaged in a felony offense. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). We reject appellant’s claim that his sentence was improperly enhanced. See Whitehead v. State, 446 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). We reject appellant’s claim of error as to the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction because we do not believe the error to be fundamental and the appellant failed to raise this issue in the trial court.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. State, 445 So. 2d 677, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11852 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

445 So. 2d 677 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
538 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Akins v. State
462 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
O'BRIEN v. State
454 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)