Alvarado, Jose Zamarripa

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: July 13, 2015
• Docket: WR-73,133-04
• Status: Published

Opinion

!, § (;OF 1 1111)11»'161)`011 101 1110 C[ 51<1< 0 FCOUY+ by Pe')lv%`

umw S§I\§Es ’)3 155~011 §§6111 <;1\31 §0/10011616$~ 59<1§4 ’

RECE\VED |N IOSE AW¢\RAW, 1761 11011€1 Pro 561 couRT oF cRuv\\NAL APPEALS VS. JuL 13 2015

\\ // 1115§6§101111166§ 1116 99999699051@9@1616

`\11§\§ 01@11§§\0§61§§\ 01 1111\6111§ PE§§§\o§ER,QoR§,\=,c§e\> A§)o §)\>\) 16§2\§§ 111 c1111)61: 0130151613611663 161\\)1.

\6111‘1&¢”~6€1 hamm twenth 115 lCoHecfe<)awe' Upo'm'z/ ij 051 mma/0

1 16166/ 66 51 1665#1§66

1100 166 656 21 130§£111/111917( 77)'3§

"`ONE 'TKUE (`,ONMENT 01: NI§NY’/j',aw\ `§\1\110(£11)§.9

Cowside§mg 01\\0§ ev§<)€mce now wa§\a\o\e §11660€€116§16)00§6 1116sz ev\§u §6111\115 §easom&»§/¢éoo\o§o$§bg§)§\§ Aues§eé W\§e§a\§0`1 lncvs§@<)

Fondamcm‘a/ MKCam'age Of:jux{fce: 115 1116 11(111 611601 116601\§§§1:90) 9:999611\` 4 156110' 711 011911611 1111§ 01 51111616161‘16) 111656W11111e 50011611&166 9 1 6;9 1161 1111 copy 811116 opp@s@ Cvuuse11111 611/110 115/1161611 151/16161:61

1151116 755 616 reque__n‘db 711/161101161111/1651`)1/11/11 811/14 E)zec\/%@g} on 111191116 811 169 011/11 99 1015 '

811,60/5,11616111111, 1161/box ' h 1

CSINIBOZ/CINIBOZ TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE 07/08/15

RllB/RPA6567 IN-FORMA-PAUPERIS DATA 10:45:18 TDCJ#:'01565198 SID#: 07954820 LOCATION: RAMSEY INDIGENT DTE: 07/19/12 NAME: ALVARADO,JOSE ZAMARRIPA BEGINNING PERIOD:

PREVIOUS TDCJ NUMBERS:

CURRENT BAL: 0.00 TOT HOLD AMT: 23.18 3MTH TOT DEP:

6MTH DEP: 6MTH AVG BAL: 6MTH AVG DEP:

MONTH HIGHEST BALANCE TOTAL DEPOSITS MONTH HIGHEST BALANCE TOTAL DEPOSITS PROCESS DATE HOLD AMOUNT HOLD DESCRIPTION

NO BANKING ACTIVITY WITHIN THE PAST 6 MONTH PERIOD.

STATE OF TE As cOUNTY OF BQQ'ZD(L{Q' ' ON THIS THE +_V\DAY OF §Wg§ I CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS A TRUE,

COMPLETE,AND UNALTERED‘COP MADE BY ME OF INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE COMPUTER DATABASE REGARDING THE OFFENDER'S ACCOUNT. NP SIG: PFl-HELP PF3-END ENTER NEXT TDCJ NUMBER: OR SID NUMBER:

33 3 3 33 . 33 '&'.‘"3‘3"'3“‘:‘;3"3"3'3" "3 33 3 ¢zos¢..v~ n. 2 vAuj.`.¢i-j '°

mary ruw¢. m n tom : 0

RECENED lN couRT oF cR\M\NAL APPEALs

JUL 13 2015

Abe\Acosva,Clevk

tth

No.

IN THE '

sUPREME coURT oF..THE UNITED sTATEs

JOSF; AL\/AQ[\D(`l ‘Z, '_ PETITIONER

(Your Name) vs. `l\l\‘. E>TATE GF'TEXAS,"<>.JY ot\\". § REsPoNDENT(s)

,' lVlOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS `

The petitioner asks leave to file the attached petition for a writ of certiorari without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis.

Please check the appropriate boxes: ~

xPetitioner has previously been granted leave to proceed m forma pauperis in the following court(s):

EPetitioner has not previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in any other court.

E Petitioner’s affidavit or declaration in support of this motion is attached hereto. -

[l Petitioner’s affidavit or declaration is not attached because the court below appointed counsel in the current proceeding, and:

[l The appointment was made under the following provision of _ law:

OI`

E a copy of the order of appointment is appended

apt

(Signature)

AFF|DAV|T OR DECLARAT|ON lN SUPPORT OF MOT|ON FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

I, 3 S A `Z ,am the petitioner 1n the above-entitled case. In support of my motion to proceed in forma pauperis I state that because of my poverty I am unable to pay the costs of this case or to give security therefor; and l believe I am entitled to redress.

1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each of the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any amount that was received weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the`monthly rate. Use gross amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions for taxes or otherwise.

income source Average monthly amount during` Amount expected - the past 12 months next month_ You _ Spouse _ You Spouse Emp|oyment ll `$j $N/A $ 10 $N¢/A

Se|f-emp|oyment " $L_ $_N,/A_* $`p $_NM`

income from reel property $ $ N/A $ ,¢ . ' $M (euen ee rental rnedrne)

interest end dividends $ $ l\l/A‘ b $ ¢ " $ M/A eifte-' $ $ l\l/A $ IO $ i\l/A Alirneny $

$ N/A $¢ $ tle

Chi|d Support $

,¢ ¢ d ,¢ Retirement (such as social $ Q $_N/A $ g $MZA` U g ¢_

security, pensions, annuities, insurance)

Disabi|ity (such as social $ l security, insurance payments)

Unemployment payments $

Pub|ic-assistance $' (such as We|fare)

-Other( (specify): N/A 7 $¢ - ' $J!ZA_ $j¢ $ N/A Total monthly income: $ Q $ NZ'A $ 16 ‘ $ N/A

2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent first. (Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.) `

Emp|oyer Address Dates of Gross monthly pay

Emp|oyment eli/gi ll//A ,ll//A L__

$ /ll/A _lvl,/A "_,ll/,/l $¢____ *AMA_‘ _A/f/A A,Z,_ZA__ $ ' '

f 3. List your spouse’s employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first. (Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)

Emp|oyer Address Dates of Gross monthly pay » Emp|oyment

MA_ .lf,/.A » ` ,ll//l $ ‘ , __N,ZA_` _ ,/i/,//i ll_l,//i1F - $ _ A~/,,/,/i ./l./,/./l _¢144¢%__k $*AJ,ZA__

4. How much cash do you and your spouse have? $ ¢

'Below, state any money you or your spouse hav/e in bank accounts or in any other financial institution.

Financia| institution Type of account Amount you have Amount your spouse has p/A ,)l//A $j¢ $ p,/A $ a $ ,o/

`AM___ /\/_/.A. , . __A/,Aé.` ~ ‘ /1///1 $. 2,§/ $ y///l

é"l

5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing and ordinary household furnishings.

|j Home - l:| Other real estate Value AM A Q y Value NZA Q l:l Motor Vehicle #1 l:l Motor Vehicle #2

Year, make & model M‘ ZA; n _ Year, make & model MZA; value a ' ,_ value a A;;A

[:l Other assets Description )i/,/A Value

6. State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the amount owed.

Person owing you or . Amount owed to you Amount owed to your spouse your spouse money

path sopth $paéLh _M_~ _ _$_¢_` _ $_NZA` , *~¢£e _$44__ $Aralh

7_. State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.

Name ` ` » Re|ationship _ Age ~,,//l _ ll/A" 4 ‘ _ f M,/A; .M/,t wi ' - ll/A, A/,/.t ' M.//l ' . t il/.¢l

8. Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Show separately the amounts paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly, quarterly, or annually to show the monthly rate.

You ` Your spouse

Rent or home- -mortgage payment

(include lot rented for mobile home) $_]Lh $_Mh

Are real estate taxes included? E Yes MNo Is property insurance included? E Yes _ MNO

Utilities (electricity, heating fuel,

water, sewer, and'telephone) $._[Lh $hM_h Home maintenance (repairs_and upkeep) $_¢h_h $_Mh

Food wl l n v $_phh $_MAh clothing ` $p@h $_AL,ZZ-l_h Laundry and dry-cleaning - l $_Lh $__MAh Medical and dental expenses $_Mh $thAh-v

You ' Your spouse

Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments) $¢ ' $ g\l/A

Recreation, entertainment, newspapers, magazines, etc. $ a $ M 1 4 '

Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)

Homeowner’e or renter’e n _ l t ,o( $ Avl;/A Life _ l v $ Q( ~ -$ Al/A` Health ' __ $ 15 ` $ N//t Motor vehicle y al $ ii \$ M/A oulee atl/t t d t Al/A Taxee

Alimony, maintenance, and support paid to others $ ¢ $ M a A

Regular expenses for operation of business, profession,

7 or farm (attach_ detailed statement) $ rd ' b $ )l//A n - Other (specify): N/A; $ la $ _l\i/A_ Total~monthly expenses: $ g $ N/A

9. Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expenses or in your assets or liabilities during the next 12 months? 1

U Yes § No If yes, describe on an attached sheet. N/A

'10. Have you paid - or will you be paying - an attorney any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form? ij Yes RNO '

If yes, how much? ¢

If yes, state the attorney’s name, address, and telephone number: /V/A

. 11'. Have you paid_or will you be paying_anyone other than an attorney (such as a paralegal or a typist) any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form?

[l Yes 1 No lob’mimb i“hc€oplcs intl/la.l)nii' i_m.l Li\omg. If yes, how much? g

If yes, state the person’s name, address, and telephone number: N/A

12. Provide any other information that Will help explain why you cannot pay the costs of this case choi K haul fw mg money ,TDC_Xdoes vtoi' pay movwivli<) wages For my work ,' ":[ ila los~l/

~evétyi\tivtj since Io)ctg ovildm §tl 15 rmcgi'ul, dual cdvovlgftl l ly (pvttn‘d@(l", fm aap-mt tmt 1

Ciicl not Lovuvni‘l‘.| 162 beievt“`l`vuii`gevti”€(ii fight 96<1¥”$»

l declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

»Executed on: joy fla H‘/ .'£0 151 ` , 20 15

well

lN THE

SUPREl\/|E COURT OF THE UN|TED STATES

JOSF=: ALVARWO 'Z l _ PETlTloNER

(Your Name)

VS.

Tli'r'. STME OFTEXAS levi Otll': v _ REsPoNDENT(s)

ON PET`|T|ON FOR A WR|T OF ,CERT|ORAR| TO

THE l)NlTF,\) STATESlllsTRlLT COUY\TSOOWERM bmk\€\' GF¥EXM MLEMLNMN (NAl\/lE oF couRT THAT LAsT' RULED oN lleRlTs oF YouR oAsE)

PET|T|ON FOR WR|T OF CERT|ORAR|

cost A\\rtmrio eZ,Tlic:# lsc§l

tamm fine Ullt llol) tit 655 l

(Address)

ites\lmollt;l ede 7 7 59 3

(City, State, Zip Code)

lll/A

v (Phone Number)

. QuEsTloN(s) PRESENTED . ` 1.€ lillian olli'OltDEK" lot lull ll ligul’iOl/l `\s gi\lc\/l, can lljosllatignovecl llttlltc Slccl'c dwi midst logi\lt mcli€dil litigation clcvli€cl al tvle gain lllt llltlte'l~esl el losllpafé wm l dlaifuih digrrg l:rldl“lo pmth ivtvlotevlte ovt otcllwtt ilm)tl,l lie hold drillni'ilc

l Coctsioll£\l\Mlvlevti/inl extt)l'il€ott)'to obluivto,tc§ltdidiltg order dgnl)/l§l'rvtt ? 4 t ls legal tot dt)ul>lic servant coillll malicious ialcvdlovl, to lll’w O'l‘dlt el-l¥ecll“\lw willsevj»l; l~o de itt""l>trstvtd\ dod)'wtet“ls tillle lord cr"djnd use tmmlll'llta;llliz innottltot,dyul uses q ptqiole,np amslt)urlnnl,no hiland a'.s(ltp\titl being teml? C. tie ultriet ila ldoilo lie l>d;lml\gj ¢`xlorldc>ltllv immttotlell Si)`?€ dill you ??3 ltlltctl is goal

levi nloh/' on S~l

4 LlST OF PART|ES

[ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.

All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of

all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this petition is as follows:

TRlAL toilet tom l)\s`ilelt'i coil hi w£l,ilz tollith Tl:xn$ mm l\l>l’&i\L,ElCtiTil C(llll€i Ol= APPEALS.-El. '\?ll.§(i AllTltlE ll.oi ltlllztil§ Cl)lllst could or cl

ltl\\itt§ alive §2254, ll..‘s. owned too lo soll‘itlt;`ll\lla'ldltl.¢.,

TABLE oF coNTENTs'

oPlNloNs BELow ............................................................ j ................ 1

JuRllechoN ................... ....... .................... , .......................... l ........................ 3 coNsTlTuTloNAL AND_sTATUT_oRY PRovlsloNs leoLvED ................ 4 sTATEl\/lENT ol= THE cAsE .............. _ .................... .......... _ ........................ éj l REAsoNs FoR GRANTl-NG THE_.vleT ....... § .................................................................. \'l, l ncoNol_usloN ......................................... ............................. ' ...................... - .............. “..'....Lll

lNDEx To APPENl)lcEs APPENDlx A The tit ttly, Cmotl Codrl'£ OP\WElL €ol hill d»dldlll ll li`g<\'llor/l Merlls"

APPEND'X B Slctlt ian Cotl'lls llcctslol/l Covlllltllovl

APPENDIX C Slo}r¢ Cwllol€tllnllldl A\)pedls Devlljlvtd, Revl"cul ll 079st APPENDlx o §lctln Codl'¥o€€tlllmml l\rppectls lll\\llllil'~i\_'r CMN¥\N'G OuT-llr~`iln_£ llP,P;l\t'/, APPENDlx E E l<§\i\ll€oul-lol l\ppcalS`Al`~E{t inle Cos€:l\lttl Apyect_l:

' APPEND_lX l=§+dh'.s' \Respovl$c'lo lhlllll?(ll lliOi(last) Applt¢d*ttola.clcvlglvlg tllll@ol°

TAELE OF Nl'l'Hl) l<`l'll ES Clll§l)

garrity/dd l/,Slc{~e /l7 lex Ul',m 1132 50 Zzl 637» ~ -# 26 water tr 3th 7? sw id lzeCl't;z/;) 191 wad/awv'rS-/ale, ?6’/ dol Zzl /78 Cascrrve/str/. 15 ll carltlr,s+ale 399 sd 2d tro card drawn ltth it CCUY)'H 0 U¢$l'ftl€, 462 SCd Zrl 7/?(7(>1 A}>f;»l lovelanle ]l‘£‘[$)e_.____________e 47 watt l Sltl@, 505 so Zr) 241 (m la lti?) . 918 Erp rule Alu<'a'qdo Alo ll//Z"U/ 155 03 l ... iii E,rpcl+r Alvattdo Alo wkrzz, lz:s O‘i -‘ 14 §X paula G't{'/i(ail-, 952 Sél 2d immch A'PV»“ SC\lt lll-tlalll€ l?‘ltll e___________....‘ 45 ar petit cane/dela sd al elt(m olm,tl,,,»,l€t 7‘l$'6w ch ZQ(T€X film lipp l€l€?)) h 36 Faflcwt(l v, $htle 632 st,) Qzl GZle ...e_e_~.eea, hew qu( lagos V Sfdlc 756 603 Zrl(i'a< /lpp SQltllllldw?c/QQ&’/> et /eldl - Zl llc/ig t~ stair/leo so 2d 134 gm cna App,md) .:l7 llelrl`l F 50 MZ‘( v l l(l lim/469 v llolol»ttl L€'ly ZOOOll¢l/let?ll----_»W slate vf Banoa 760 so il las 16

Slvl°cltlaudu lvctsluwgwm‘/éé U¢S ass (l(t€¢t) . g `_ ,,_Z‘l

ll

TP

._C_@lc_s._ . why slow ll llollllll/lzllllsflls~ cll l. l:l,zl lou/ll l c~l. 3037 . 32 'Zz‘l(llln v. S{_a‘l£e,l$`@$' 563 ZJ 54 1 _ - 15 mm l,¢§lqll,vsse sw ll lov(le,l.l'\lll>.'-lloll$loll[lll\ll)lll.] lilley .3l 1

_U,.sl ll lz@egvlll

¢lllll.s.~clll. § lll'lEl\lll Sl'lll\. »11‘\ ul»S.-CGNQT.Al»lll'Q l=olllz'leem\l l \30“0\‘1' TM Colllllllllllll all l Sll). ~ 43 collle llll lllrlclls E£\MQ

lelle Pelllll coole lillo'l@l`>l !‘l `I`echLSQev\A,'\ CO\)E§ \5¢0"1 l\‘,o‘\'t 5_1 20 Tem$ ?evla\ COOE§ 265 03 @O- " m 'Te)c<\$ Pevla\ Col)E § 3i.0.| N°°K q -@é lesz l>evla\ cell § '5‘{¢¢ 'L @5 ' -~ ~'-~ - w w lean Pevla\ CON; § 3"1,,®?.,4 16 ¥l-eq\lrwl cma S¢L€€'Y* COBE, 6 l‘l,GZl. § »---~'_'*¢-=*~+36 Go\ll col)l.;,.. Cowl[)., Ml;\lc ac+,¢|(l '$l 07 ‘l- ' 39 Telq.l_ col col>z=, cll

<_`C‘DES AND E\R`UCLE ‘P G~_ ` 0¢

"`\`ex‘c\s C\`\W\i¥w\ Proc,c)_ddfa P\t)d.(,\€. 9\¢03¢ ;% Texas C\"\Mv\a§\ V€oc<>,c)uve Al¥icl¢ ?>,O‘,L, _Ié ¢1`8 ‘Texo$€c\wivud Procec)on é¢as Cn‘w\`m\`?wce<)we M'\i‘c\¢ i4.@c,, ,29. Texa§ Cf`\¥“i'"\f\) VNCQF)W€. Mch 9`(.`3k -[°\ Te>t<\$ C.<§cs\aiv\sd Vwcec)v{e Rr~Hc\Q 15.13 Se_c)c)w [>\€)rdcle¢i?.¢®¥€_ _ _3‘?

|N THE

SUPRE|\/|E COURT OF THE UN|TED STA`;I'ES PET|T|ON FOR WR|T OF CERT|ORAR|

Petitioner respectfully prays that a Writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment beloW.

OP|N|ONS BELOW

[. ] For cases from federal courts:

The opinion lof the United States court of appeals appears at AppendiX the petition and is

to

[ ] reported at § OI`, [ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or, [ ] is unpublished

The opinion of the United States district court appears at Appendix the petition and is

[ ] reported at - _ ' ;or, [ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or, [ ] is unpublished `

x For cases from state courts:

The opinion of the highest state court to reviewlthe merits appears at Appendix _L to the petition and is [><1 reported at LWH.. ACT|D{\l MG,.§I[Q.‘(.V" 155 ; Or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or, [ ] is unpublished

. 1 . (| /) The opinion of the Cé> " \ ’ ' ' court appears at Appendix_ C to the petition and is _ ]Xl_ reported at LX_PM§?_MMAQ NO.WR*`IS,|`SK`O£} ; gr, [ ] has been designated for publication but is'not yet reported; or, [ ] is unpublished l

gmeele N"rereeee;\;;l-,e€ coumé:ukls\>\€l\°l\\

Ovi llagugl 19*“, drill :The drilled Slales l)l§lf del Coo`vl»$odlllel m vlsl~l vel oC~

leeds mds butler h led e_llewvamdde ed Or

l § 61 eaja A?l’, d., l n ed lelcll ls "okl)El€£D;al/e`bgov‘leellg (él Gell l‘l‘ldgcel\;@ d/lvrlle‘>mld§‘ l Exlaglll`~ovts apply lex L\'l>)aledo§ procedolql delaull» lO, `3, lee<),il, Tlee.FiQ\~MCle¢U{l.

C'£e)l l\mes ivtlel prele all opelele Gol bill Cw\d call lill, wl ll ease ll m €evlc)cwe'vvla\ bowden e 06 luglece/f l)fl, levee l* ?.¢ O»l Mmo'\l l`Z W, 9.01$ lle&vtd` Colleclewj Slcdeazeld leland esq help "é_jr@_l:led_\l`ee.lc¢i@,Llo\1\1¥<*73,l$_§\O‘lj T\/utleaplm ivevvedlele. deleevvlrwallom lallll$ lbee»'

JUR|SD|CT|ON

[’] For cases from federal courts:

The date on which the United States Court of Appe_als‘decided my case was

[ ] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case.

[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of Appeals on the following date: , and a copy of the order denying_rehearing appears at Appendix '

[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted to and including ' (date) on _ (date) in Application No. _A

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under_28 U. S. C. §_1254(1).

l For cases from state courts:

1 The date on which the highest state court decided my case was """'“f"' A copy of that decision appears at Appendix _‘\l;§_

[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date: , and a copy of the order denying rehearing

appears at Appendix

[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted to and including ______ (date) on * (date) in Applicati_on No. _A - '

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. §1257(a).

CONST|TUT|ONAL AND STATUTORY PROV|S|ONS |NVOLVED

13 U § C A§ 1154 Cb.) O) C/'\) \llC/l penal CODE § B. 07 FuWCl'a_\/mnlal l`llSCCult'clge 09 des'l\"c@ q\PP A

2 elias o 3 FOURTHANWDHEMT Unlau)lel lhealelea‘+~e Sealcll/md Sledl:lCU few /ll’l’ A. 1_

o.s quane,lwopeemcew AMEl\l\u/~laer: ‘l)elael~eev\ H\ eLl'lll‘-SL' 99 l‘lS’$Y$\’l`- A»

. . l n ,, . 1 »/ n 0.5 Fou rul M\W l:o'\ll('l€€lll l/ll N"E‘ml\{£°l-lr./ Ul‘llfl_lld l"lll kli€$’f`(..lql|'/K,LM.¢ U‘Sr(¢A-é l%d/ APR Al

" me U 3 com /m;m) \‘|+'1 Fol)l’l'£¥.eln\ , Equql evaluations/but illness Clau_se: US comsll\llellv 591

AllR B

9_<@ o 5 C ll § 125%` helen el Coveslde~ralmm, Com§ldevllejall llolevid€aee noel availallb

lner 09 €QCl' lnodld l/\eele_evtlellallwd reasonable doellol as lo gl)lll\drvlolfefhaal¢ and APF 9 land A'l)l7 F

ed ,. l ‘l'l ll 3 C /l, id l‘l€f$ (l)epnlal\eaolCo»/eslllellcwdel Slalelely rl`qlelsj 91ll.l1ld9e1*lllll19el"’“f’ m levee Aee App l AM@

edelmale ‘ll U¢S< ll ¢`§l llBSKlF b W\Wl/\§' Tvvl€vllw“l‘\ll_

imm Sul)eelee\“e)el>ee levee 55 (bd , v rll)le 59 tel o l lees el dell P;oe@deee`.;,l>elee\l S'eajeate.g.., A.vl>, o,l\v'e 'F_

sTATEMENT oF THE cAsE , v lam likequ ceslraivlell ol- m% llell:, iveTDC?S Colml€e»eal lns~l\"lellohs %lvl:slav: pelseomllo an lvl\le/sl\*qalel§ perjuvell lesllm 119 ,\ll`@)la'llom Gl~¢l\l¢ gewwl'ls pell oe~l leoese level “\vL/excl\alge)l€ shall ne l ll lei 'l\/le \eglm'lvll@ ol'éel, col clallcllm wllll)elal%vl wag,,_ l\lle,\' pel)llc sel\lmllj §>a\`zl OUN llo\lse \`c)/lll mg lms/ally male llole Ol‘l§ 0 vl Ayrll l‘l, 200 `L, A po'll¢@ lelecll\l`~l.~ Ml¢ Col los\ll llmleal,a)ll\rwe-l mg elleclll-e comevll,avul wlll\e\)l aseMcl/\ cl)c»lwl.ll’lqevelal wle'llg seize€»llecl al lll‘el\ was lull>alaml lm\lelllllla*lllrj mall a lvl QAeel,\-llecl~l Ce\n°zlelece lv\ excl/\nmgedealil:el wuj l)ll\leli license§, celllelv@ peel}zesc la bealslelo wall w\gjl\l$ c\eec»lle sewell mglnmllg¢,Tl/w. slalexle)/lv`l lwmlell{. was l l\/Le sel)po'sel\l lclwvls leallmemg,gll¢ `\v\\lewlell lllal:ll@ql\s\eqe in em sam l>ell,¢celelel\ `\s lle,. swl/ml law wm reevn

sTMEMEM 0 P THE CA<§E "m mme3 'm€, 3333 wM§le\?mj si{ep<}ooghm was P\ag{u@ @§SCW)G\ mw m (§W\md\g 3m gee w\r\@ 321¢€$ 33 kis§ a %39’;31§)3 him/lof 33i0)0€$23\/»{v\253 2033 539 $:.Tc) 3020.3 hew $CW)G\ G<\"€Wi€, mg 532@009\13€( 1"\/1\¢2\/3€3, \Qr)ghih@ '3%3§:13033323 bd ps`WMc_ paQ'/®m 33 313 NMJS 323 \rm ma mt\m~ mw \ze\§ev23 3320<153 3{3@,,3\13 wei/3m 3\2@ sc\/~n@\ 2013 ,-\ _` .` oC-§('os&$3/;9 am 33 1\~3‘§§(\,_@3@2,01 12 Q,; 329 mem 20 3333 gum-01 2 m3 539 wimc§§ Ow‘¥\u`§ CO~S€ `1§: me wi§e:'s'\/Q was wil\ 315 im 32533€§{ hew `Mirhchsifo(`rw\ime$$¢f, mg 2031 was exclu323 ,'3~33.\ cowv\se\ 32€0§23 irs 223\ w 30 3\423301¢/3. Iv»\vesir\\gq{m wm \h`ll¢mm\,beiv@ emma oL irwiww 33 dow 333¢%@5 drake M“qi§:;\m& "`uv»&fu 2`: ms ma\ic\"<§w s 333 am 33 O\oim`vu Gro\m 32@§<\\.92533232143 2332 l ms 333 123 31 ewsz m3 my Ws'@ma\ 3023312335 333 Wuv\lam 33 33 0\323323:12,)<\5 m30'w32s"oa3\/\,w23 hew ' cause l 3223 mg `ID`,‘cc> cash 21ch §vq)pm'ir mg §M»~£'l_% l `\\/3€)323 &Cm\sejimir¢wwir,' I moved mg M r, 2333 33253193334~§ 3\~0@#3542 0§33<>{) boasw£mg gm 2 aqu mg 2[\`12133§[€0¢ MH 302 0332 3090 \9023/~ '3'€) MGT ltd 0~\/13 §§ 1 333 332 12002)\3 COMirW\m~iCo 3/\0\\/233023)\£., 32313933@ W-W mg 1333 03 \/m m3 mg SSt\) 6333(:%32113139 3\42€3),:¥\/»3(%33€3@.5 323 \q{\v\ §§332230\\)'9/¥¥\23/`)<123 mg I 92 033 3@&32<3~33'<132 washu 3;\32 321/323 im 3)@ 333 2 ., Miv@\” 1 vwv‘uii"iw“§ 10.,1€@323 mg ERS CK/wc\&,3m 3323&9@32)2§'§>20;> \,2 323/afs cowspimg conic¢m 23 \Jx<»)rass 333 wm 332 323 iw 333 pmm‘g im gilroy \00312112\21`35 W§>@cwge_jw§ vw 3 a mm 0 CW`S 1333/f covam§v@ 30 \M`W\ am 332 Lv\\ves§\"gajrw \)[`13323 €301;~1 62292/. 3332 m mdu 30 332 920¢32`\ \2\/\¢:: comm mg ;I pmomlhj mm 3\/103\/12. 333 133\4.§$ onJS, ii Fo\\om 302va wagome \MQO@,$ a>/\3 '\'332 aw)`§\\i~s wwwf , nom 3§232)`39 30 be 3032/ mg ®O$j \},\.u W,ese mmi 330 32 330 313 Moim\ Ov'\ 3>0*{<1)/13:>30\£ m3 j V~S mo 323 3 9_£.500 //ls ., Mcm\y mov\,e:g,; +\313I \22331> SUW@~€-iv mg 333 ilg,becam ivwesic\lg@;.iw< m3 ms Wp w boHM¢§ mg 2\€`2\/32, 323 wmswe`¢§,am`) 22€3523 30 932 312 wm iA/. 1 go n§qmi¢d i 1332331‘9/33 \! 133 ml becam“>e.M/w;vmf 3333;323 342 \m\assmwif$ as 32 peow\i§e 330 ma. . 6

STArmEM'r 0 F'IHE cAsE l _ _ Ou Mm__) \L\W, 20 G`L, 1 astle's &M%Smmj£g ef'l" wm §/o'{ro Was gm M"<:L()ep - Gf'W/reM "`n;) ve'\;)of‘jf gave i"“ega"( 0`0{£\¢ 143 e.é‘: nw ib)a'€§c`iqx)m(,`tv\ Y€)YQ\\G&`\OW Uv\qwgu ug cure,s*e£\ ma w`i\\\m¥ ones¥ wm tav&@\aevi ‘<€ques¥e§) foam iss\)@b "m¥\me cmé) 01ch calls oo’v mg vaéa§ wg\/x\$ béiv\g mb 5 Me\m be§ow<\ ,We I.C.E‘o€?\;e§)s"$`;\qcec\ a\no\c) on me w`tho (emsom,‘ogj ocei?ce€/s iaziv\es$ qua Sp`i‘r¢,l was 011\103»(0\\\3 Mivwb aim Ma¢j \4,£00?1.,,0»1)¥§` \ Sep ~ Jr<»,mn\;)c>.,v |6, 5100%‘, S"\>C‘Yeev\ movcjr\ns `WL cusjvoéj mo scm v\°qs`\<`)vwf) comp W`Ms G%q\`vld wm wmer wade, nljr\/M iv\A'ic}wv\eva m iv\§o¢ uncd§ovi wasq)sesevh\ed,w{jr\& KOO,OOOJNS bouc) wm red)cec\é(lv\eum mc£weé mci wiq\n’cs¢»'l `m§owm) 'Iro maj Coovlse`\ibu§ hec\l\ooses v\o¥%o w pse<>@v»\ m\€g<»\\® »,0\/\ SQPXQW»\)A \7,2006.,`1€%€{\)@3 a \cr¥€`wlc')ic‘¥mm)€ made \og ‘c)/m po\`\c@c)_epm\vv»ew’g w'i\l\/\o\)¥Wg complqiyuw{/or \)ic¥€vv\'s comequ also_w§'H/L am$mpo:si\o ll éq§v¢ c,£ ¥\Ac covv\Mi»’\o\/\ OU‘\/w @Qbé oQ%e‘v\se}q\§o me]c\/wo ‘rjciw\cam) p\ace`wd%wb/adfc{mm{; Tbm S‘r<é~<`i\ l(), LOO`I., Secovu\ 1 O‘\A Co\w¥wecofr);"\v\qg 15 /LGO`/», \L~>u¥ 1 ms awe§h<) gm bhd WL \LW? l ',;LGO`( .,T\'\"\"\`B § G\A \M\C\ mev\_¥, le'\ mpo§g{\o\e écx¥%"OV\ 0¥ &\)00`\’ l\'?\'%\ \,?,007:/ T \/LQ reason jr 0 Siqv\ O\\cx¥z iv\e)

~ _ _ s~\»\'rmwr ome case b +Nm 90@&3~¥0&\»\@1)0£\/1&3 wome\ as l exp\a§v\ -ivwwy\¢fwm\ cowen cawch U% , \ne c.)i` U err me 20 years M prisév(; `L` com see Was anger iu\\evl again l fe.€osec) \f\`\s oG€@( wiqu X wave@ QM§)} j¥`(iecaose Sh‘m 0(`~€‘0@¢5 bumé€dc)e$ ‘rb wm(wle gul`\\‘y,. ` , fva §§ law mojr,+\/\QH oé\\\ m€\`\LU\/ce,bujr he q\s€> said lc\/L£c: 1(4 l \nab mmeg,o~: §§ l 1000 f k §ex c\ c<:\\¥e\` Lov<);/g\"\)e Xnk»v\ a mvvw, ‘¥\1<;\/) he wool$ makeaéea\ com biggl '¥os majrc,_\oe §we iw‘r\ms§ mmcmj' beccmsQ./`(Cos¥z\`q‘\,ovc)oamx) B‘£\:S wm MOH,M: ll a\sc> \w@\)<,c@ lc\/\c>§ 0(~9€1 \oew)selavn no)c ag@v@ mem/chef awc) Idov'¢i know @W/ Coé\.‘ce\` 10»<§’./ 'To xep\a!.e '¥\/\c lwe(€ecX\Ve munsell m\sec\: mg \/my\é 'F@c mh \)e abl€¥© Speeu< wiJrM~\Mc joc)gQ/_\oeccygc 1 was md au@w€d '\'0 sper , `ou¥ Me;§ 933 g 30 v\o‘rq\lo» ' md me¥o spequ wich hima, Been no qnge. w Hh counse \s"' ' m;sm\u_ice,. ae€usiv\g mg Ju»:g~¥¢\‘cx\{av\d i-Q»¥`%Mc cd\)¢¥cowv\`chm.e;€m c\c,r€m{+\uxjfl did m)¥ cow\vv\\" \'l so \'ve cav\ becL\o\Q Jr<) §§ \~e awq?pea\; Pl`\`-s provv\{;Q was mde be€dm and Q€Xu ’c\/LQ co mvic,l§\"o\/\;va\se\ (%@\\e¢\,, he mm Q'\\e Meqppea\/qvu) a\om/\Jcrvw<)m@¢ ‘

1, l in€ormeé coov) sc\ *Hna"c l was umluw&) l\y acceded and Wo?f l was in cus{r)dy Fof S I"¢- +een twost wij<\m>u‘r lnd\"c’tvv\~ev\jr ov ln€ovmajr\'om bres€w‘ced., Agpo\`w{'€d Cov\/)se\ chose-§ mb{' +O ~vaze(y now ev€f vequcd `c n a Mo\\"ov» "m axisva +Me ease Puvssr_\w'\"ib avcblc\jn‘om o 64 we ‘0.»$. FOURT`H l\méw) me»'\)f,qv\c) or Mo‘r{ov\+o qcx}sh W£C\me»)rpu\asmmjt ’ro M whom eCcU{-§¢{€ 713 .OG\ clle 3'7..0\ 0 CTex`C.s\`W.? zo<.be'€v\¢; mci I"“é}@if<>s `lw+ewwoml|y’l Bas'€c¢\\L$+<>¥'¢+€dv~gsel£((KC,': 1,23-1$).

' sTArEMEm GF`THECASE The imach Ga\se,evidewca,o)a$ ode*ec) a¥h"\`a\,b`a usa a€a\>~e.ajmec) %Q,s'f€vwavy;m Cax \os \'\`\\as rea\vaes¥\`ga‘voi),\>@{w§ uaw oa¥l\ \ia§ m camjr,_abaa-Jr¥m clea\~*baéa aaa mach (av» ima \um)r€u'j wm€~essi cm ila €)us €v\g lisa 3 ku€\\"om, § vL few l\L, irm lm‘a\ co o¢)f Kv\owimq\gl CvLapLeae)€v»o\~gui‘ H\\,)L. w 1441 (;ak<,a wil‘wb; 6a lamavg B, 260€\.( ?Mabevlcla{r va\f“r\ae cowjr vv\@a\t`c\g '(§ouvzr) magu\‘-\{g, avu) ser/c‘maw) me Jco eieveu amy i'v\ pmm \:o¢'acciw\d\aal'l sua)ca£v\(v\o¥covv\vv\i` 1(.@\/»`\€ Cav\\oa'arowav\ `\\a O\ nea), and 4`9*9 €a`a Wa§ l wasg,\\lev\ G’l€_ éaas 0§ cwa ii AJf €\\ac; aw$u!ed‘ a\\ f‘ssu as `m KBO a)a%s , A\A 00\\'0 \:`ja`me ap pea\ wa§\ CKMNE§' @w':\l)\g 111 20 10;, E>< park A\uwad 0 Na.WR-?X,B`$~_O\ a Ow appea\,`l pmavla\\g ivav ` €Mmac\ appa&\a&e couv\se\ a€a\\\wo\a‘wov\$av»a pmcac)<)¢a\ da€aa\+»~,l\ppal\a+e couns‘e\ vwsacces$€ollg raised \\Cs aa)v\ C\ai\Ms ama made hcgoa)a appea\,_bolrao‘rasl cad- "wc+ab,&m) W$Jt€§ 470 lM»\‘,vv\ sla am vapo\o\i$\,wé`apmim,/'{;Ma E`Q\Ajtk Cao‘¢‘¥a€ l;\ppca\$ 1 'Tm manassas cal\ea +a *r

‘I

sr mm c air a mae case

Q(r€£iv\ae<:) Jr\u; Cov\\)\`¢"\\`aa, Re\§e@ ewa)s€ 0 §va Lag\¢ ovalm jr'cm~ d€ag o@¥\ae,€aglcsla laman ' ach Jr\/udaw.- Ov\'§uwa"'i ,9.0\’)_,1(1\\@() as`ecavu) qpp\€ca' + iov\ Qar cum t»\'o@ {mbaas carpa s uw;)e,v aMda lLO“l pro sqas ara/wedg` §1` aov\ X\,avwd) \aowl;lé 95 hair §va a Mavvlomvdum OHaw,'\L\/m Shjce (;\\ea CaReSPO/AS@ A€v\§jmg H'w}t mm @rocada ma Aa@aul_Jc> cequas\\‘ng \Lo dcgvaiss~¥\qcap p\ica{iom§(ha Cooljv a¥CNm(\/La\ Appaa\s ve.@u§ec) ¥o-m‘»)ew mg clad/usl c\'m) ah App\icajv\*aa was 3 iam CSSQ'() a) Mwo{ CK a)~c‘) ‘YW ardav. Ka\{a(rwas dev\\`a) 0v1 Se()Jce mw C, 7;01’1.&)<';)<;¢+¢ Nvamr)a N O!W R»'"? '5¢ 133 ~»a a.. am S@p+@mw \Ll,.aa\ w gm faa

€1 W'S<>w in S+ajca Cusbr)_a §99.51{ pro $e, 009 lack awéev§\amding opm (awpaw d G(Pc\a€ €y\§\§gl( \legqag£/Q'v\c} CL mi§é@\){£@j> l placed new QfOUV\JS/w\@ div NO*' fled €L L“‘\emc)- m adam a@ law sla¥€v\g wm,av\<) requesk ry valia[?,v Foc Ma¥\\\;Q" €m €\)\\ ana €a§v (§’c§qajrfawja+\ac Nema¢ama<)w\.-,TM S-kvc§re Q°»\QD aVe§yov)§e +o Jr\/lc. App\kalr¢aa accep)r\"n§ Jr\Ae\\l wro¢@,aa€wg @mc<>z)bra\ AeGQyR> iM\/{;; waist Ha dba M'¥ va{§a 116 ~H/\a\a¢ may \va s\/»GO\:) beawa jm msa/114 noa):/“ \X anew mudd . nge€<)g §

h

staub/95 m a\= me cas£

T§e § 19\1¢aeeep 1911§91\' misap§ea§`ovz o§s§a,§e§ ro\eso1~1 1afe 119091<1§ §(`la\ \s§u§ '1\¢ $§a‘§e reque§\eé 1§¢§§ §§191 S\)§§ecum§§pb§` ca1\‘0\1 10a dixvvdssa) because `:\é§} 961 faisec) 999 c\`q\m 9ropei1_9 9§11991§91§ ca99010§12119 @990¥ read 2991\3§, 1§9$~§§1€ §z1€cee §o \)io1a§e 999 919§1§`01965§1¢ igw)ved

699 OK§ER T\/w Coo%§ 0§C11vv\1§a1l§vpea1s 1ngm1 we\:\§l<§\ Cim)\`§s 09901‘10%11'9 §0{ 1911 ama 9991 1\9<11\0»?"5§$ <»»*€1\ and ee§vs.eé§a review m9 c1a\vws m cevv§s'§as 11 was owed 119 §991'\¢<11€<39 was d'csva isse¢) cai§§au§ a)v111e9 orde( Bapac§ah&uamda NO \99-73 133 03. Re§e€ axes dea\eéo9 Mavew§e~{ 1<1,')`0 11 09 Feba)a§92‘1 Lal$?l§\\¢é

q\?®q §\9 [\W\\(;;L\\ov\ 601 \,\)rb§o§ §\q§ea,$ Co\|p\)$ \Wev ai1161e1\10`? Pro se 1094§)\/1`6€ 6‘1€1/

199 +§e Fi§§§ Ci§eui§§ will 1011-01199)€991§‘901§‘09191§91199)1\`¢91\`09 amc) 19 S§Aeéavxies eue§{§§iv\g s§£\€c) 1911/1a app\ 1\oa1\’0v\ I ca9 910\/e11a11`manea') €ce\'(avd

. 999 1`v1a1:/S§91eaem‘es evee91§§99 s§€re§ \vL§§eaPp\ §ca§’ai_/z 1999999 cm OR§E\{ 95 cae11

19 a S‘§L§es §espovvs€,§c §§e Ap'p§‘ CT§\M unes§\vgj §§9111/9<9)'[)11£61§\ dv\ §eé£svm SS€():

T§e Cau<§ a§ Cw`m\vm1 L\Weals 1990\1199§§e1\(~§§ G§eu\§s OKOEK as we 11 919991 115

ce€usu)’f°

cewea) ay\$"<:avn§es§ 919 c1a`\w\s as`\§a)as` 0111)§1<€1>:\_\\9 Q»av§dcsvnisse§ app§cq§{mwc§§oo"¥

weH§ev) aa)€l LLMNW§Q 910 WK~?Z 133 04 Re§e§ was devoieb 09 §ovre 1011#

9015~ _T§a§'-is we caw§§:c;§ 1§a1%d9e15\'09 1§91%901995 99 imwwdr'a+@ Je§eém\ mq§av¢

0€1§23 §99)99@9§11 Wscmn`aqe 0§51)31\ ce 1191 requwes a§a\‘v'§ 1~ §9a1 `a)qmea§ 9111§

. ~1§9§01§<11/91 §§e 1aa) because 0919 901 aper) ever) §e§§§vvv@v\g (uvw$'ua\ p¢Mi's§ eam§)

'Iav9111ega119 3e1a\vw§ ,dePI\W O§ 111521{1)0{19 §ov acvwv¢e§§a§£¢}fb §o§c@e»v»i§,'

"1§`\; case s§oalc) be reuc¢sed, m re§vi ec) 10 emmve§§eaceuvacy 01 §§evud\`e§qm) +§e 59§1919 - 0§ Jue§¢€ H

' REAsoNs FoR GRANT|NG THE PETlTloN 1919 50¢111_119 1@\11>,1€01 §9`1\ 1191 1911 11§19¢11111113@1/11`€<1 0;§1¢1`011»,T111 3-19§119901¢111 619 011111"§\/101§ 10501§€1 1\/1<1§1)1/10<1111019§§11 mismaan 01 90511`¢10>1)01/1.§1/106§1110§@§1)1€3 10 w.vw.w 1190 cov11es1 my mims 11)§91€§0 1019 11101113 11011)1,§00111 11199111\§9111§11‘01111111§ Use 019 9e901re11'§e5§1v110 1/19:'1.:1 c\Q 011 Vw\dwm 01 S§q§e,aw$ U.S, Coms§§o§‘ow 011§11@1 ' moral@mw¢)om\ 1161111)1§>., 511112§ 2110 9@99 c)e®s 101/13 110191’1/19 11111“@ 111, 15 111 cov»€§c§ 0011\»1 U‘ S. 1)15§11¢§(001§€ 1111/110199110111 0.'1111 011101, §§a§ 1190111$ 9111111111@<11"<11¢00§211111`11~, Q§io 9 191§13 110901¢1§10 509111910 C001 1,.11>9£01111¢§ map 111011\‘011 01$1<111¢11 10 1115 011 111111;011¢€ ' 9 011111 §01<1\1;/€11/11190€§§9 110\1'1*9§101/1§1019101 Vfocess 01 1010 112-30111?1’.11.

_ » ' mm 01co1\11’e1\1$ ' 1911 1101 REASO§\# 1. 011101 101 1:011 AM 1011 11119€11\`011 1311011'01 15 1110 §_1'¢1:1'€~ 15 §§ &SON# 9~.11¢$§101`1111119 01110.'1 O\‘o§aiveé 13 '11<§01§1‘011 1113 1 §vea§s 1 ' ` 15

REASOM# 3.1“1911¢1011$ Uv11a0!€1)1€e{zde 1`1§§ 1,9~1111/1§ 10 01>19`19[\ 1915€ EV[‘JeL/lce._-_J 16

REASO\\WQ . C0111;1‘c§1`01/1 O§§aiv\ea E 091/01 1111quca Tes§?wov\9 117 Reasou# 5. @9111511111 0111111911y 19 09 01£11151>11<19 49 REASOWS,A1C00139119C9§0 51@¢11 1 v1‘1 REA$ON# C, c 1911.911`099\19 111\1<11.11111 Ane>‘§ 0§1111111111 111 Re§ala§\`@ 11 110

b

REASoN¢FL 93(@9¢101111:11/1€0$'1 Avu) 110 'Xw)w§ww§ PIQSEW§EJ _ wm R111so11#“1. 9.111111 999 1999 1113 \>191¢1119 ZM REP~SON#“I. 15.11\1 P~ELOR§, 110 vaLA\NT$ 50101<1\1 9011$11; MEI)~F .%, §§ _ REASQM 115 131 19190551§12 1910 O§§§e Cowmiss§u@§ 1110 False O(€Me.__,____£' §§ 1119011# q. 1191-190911§11(1.11.3.)1.1.1.1)1;11,,1999 /111011 01 111 9 k 5150111# 10~ E€§Qc§§u‘e Assis§anceO§ COOV¢SU \1111$ 11@11112_1;1 111111`0\14 _ ‘ ` 11 Ekso 01# 10,1\\111<1\ 6001/1591 19191§\‘011¢1119£§051:$ 1\10§ 10 F1le 110§109»-___-_3-1+‘ REA$O\§# 10, 131 Coo\nse\§ 80_116@1\11119 A§§€Ja\)§§ ' ` ` REF\S°N# 101€"1'1"€1\(0\>1§1§1\011`\/19 011)01 110111€00110§(11`1011`11¢11£\;)9:€115 ' _ 1119309#101 D. sz:\ob\c€, _ _ 35 »1-,, REASON# 11» EF€€¢§W¢A$$IS§M¢@ 01- (001/1s-e\\111as De91210111\pp0a11____1_@ 111116011# ll,A‘ 1>11€1¢1‘911 1111101`91¢1969. ,, '

» ¢'¢_

1111911\1111111 1691119 1<111`31@1§9191 §Qz_ 'RRN£EQ._, 9 311 91111\11131)1119111§1on - . 10

REASO\,\S FOR %RRNT\NG THE \A)K9T

REASON#i 999 9)\0 309/90003 99 900‘9.9»90[>900909` 009909999', 00)91000909 cov\ui‘di`cm 009$00\/\9 90€9 00990125 90599 may was 0090109 090}9/939 me 00 (9900950.99 909 se 0991090 091090¢€0<:390)99|4 q 09»999r) 93 0009009 9090&9/\ 99 90€98 99099)'90\109/9 0)999/9 990/90 09000 aw) 3090 0909 99an 9099 ~99€09 was denied 909 099`99/10990€9‘9/'¢ U)`):w$@\ 90/90<0\\/9 9090099 900099/` 9'\/99))`0 90990990999/90 993 ®0599909900§. Ov\ A09039 99 20 99 10 99 3 09099`909 C0099s MemovamJG\/w 005 Ow}ev 199/m 9999\/9 Civa)99 C0099 99990'09090<9 009 0090€900990 901 9099 009 9199999\‘009\01/990 mcav\ 009 09001909/0"9990 009/1920999/90 999/99 09090\ 6@000\/9 avu) 3090010,009090909 999 9059 avw 9900 9090 9999 09 909 009009900 0901"0'9 :3909\`09 9\/909 900|93 9a99090 90 90\900) 0)999 92909 99 999 0 9000<9090/9909 Miscavr 1090 09 3059900 e 9 ,AYF A_., 69999% 0990\900'»99, Om$ep9ew9b0( 90,0`0999.99{-909<1999`993 Ayy\icaHom 9909000$ Co0 0 909¢9.,90059090 990 0905\0»090909 Applica9900 000909 00099\9`019<1 590909 909\90 Ap p 901990»1 9¢39901909 cm` 0910€9< 909 90 99 999\‘@<\~ 990/94 9>090;@09903 9\/90?;; 009009909 009/9090990/\ m 999099 0009/9 0)09<9s 99¢,000 009909`$0999\404 am) v909 09000)9/\ Caose 099 \003\0009<9 90009900905 90 vais9 99 9900) 390969105,[»0;0? C /9)09 Mooo 999/1059)9'90€9/9 9v909/999AS LvL 603903§| 1009 rw 9059`0990@9/990¢0509/990€) 0949" 009\»9199 1 10901~ md 90 aWM coa/asc 9 0009 990 c\noses 9/90990 90\0 00909001/9 90 400$9/199/99 9"\/9390900:%+ 009090 9\/90 990<>0<0990/1 39099 093000, Apye990v99 905 009099090<9 9\/9¢99990 00099@900$9@) 4500039 999099 969sz 990 030390‘09, am\ 60 09 900$ 900in 9\/90\`$50 0 000 came 9099¢0` n 990 9909 S90(90s@05000509 7 l 000 009 09900009059)0099):91500`<99900999 3090va couv;s¢\ 99409 l was 00’912$9¢3 m 9`e,9a 990990¥\ 0399\9009 N9059 0000| 101/99:9"90<9/90$69 990990 355€90§€ 990 919€95 09\190\09961/9099\0 909991999 000039100/99 009 000909990009609999099@§9 ayu§ §_L_O_\ 59th 093009 lnRespo\/)sc 500/1099 00 9 999@1 \s vw 0099/90 9999 901<90{)099€0/9'95 0109>0$`\9\`0/9 9\909 999{‘0\0 310 9 0)009/) 0099 990 990/94 90 909005009909 909/905 009'0 99995

9’3

' _ . R%M\\s FoL mm\we THE wm -

§@ev\ `\'v\b \`L'*a¢\b\oulr a\s@ cov\ walreb:/Squjre§_ Re§pomse V.C(‘ lv\ S%Q\Z§°“L'lmés a%m s M+ \;LB en°c§¥\e<§ Jvo vio\cch S‘m*va, av\c) Pe<)am\ '< €3\1&$; Qof 3m ransom §er?g\icamm%§paak `\vLc,ooH~;/S+uh,vio\aie§%ew man w leg Y)MQIAW\ stavv` ca1/13 50 ‘M>jv 5\>@<\»( plauan wm Ev\g\§s \/\, leam)zz¥ elecch mg§e_`\(i; Iéow`{ \¢\qu,) M@"u co\es o('r~ la&€:)“*f*\;cy:§mg wm e ¥\¢¢ SXedL, Appom{e<) Cow<>el 0.\/@ 5cbth 'H i‘CL\ COO\H' ‘f€ 90$@5 lco Qxewcise lam U»$‘ Covls v ` X‘{A(QX€@\/\;`s,,\;?o\o`&ms jc\ncd QM\'X\Q¢§ m.d'o \>e,se\m§e(\ \><>.Qov elm<&$'&< iad ,“\\/\£ S`WQ W\a\ic`\'ous `v_v€rev\i\`owa\@ mwivlg, Cov\jrf vwec) wi)c\n 5<\/\@\\1/1 @dw prosec\)jr\`o v(‘\) H\”po \&LQ Ivmes‘s&~gqlrov q/W M§/ q Q\sajce.<+i‘monyr+\/Lc C<)u\n1 ad mTHeJ Q?q\sc;`\vwewjrec) covi€`~essc"om g

Dvl No \) embd lot ,QO l%."fm.(om’ro§ G€w\im\ Avpea\$ ‘ie(~oseéh) raw e,co ama CQV\JFCS¥ mg Q.LQIWS,QM ’igmwb +`\ac »F\' €XMC&\LQ€)(§»§OZ\)EK¢O§ mc\\,avu) éd€\m»iisseb '/¥\M \FU)Y\`°‘/l wi>\*/\O\\¥ww"’dw 0\¢9¢!,*\/\¢€\'¥¢$\)\¥€3 `\V\<{€uv\<}omem‘rq| Wscam‘ageo€ josh‘ce%age&)`vm 9_¢\ , 20\'5 al @i\eb a Goo(+M App\'icq{iou ll.07 geo sgst QL §ud@mewfo€jvha 406%\/\ bush idrCoo l)r Coe\o\o @vw+gTe.xcLS¢ E&(mle-WQQD &\\o .w \1' 73, Lzz~o4 Mbav;<@,: SMA M¥M\vaw€ir;"§)mc('€m €\»\\aw_b un kingdom in &\/\L I\W\ica\oév\,.l Q\e'o sjrc&e§ imisz Np\imi?m¥s abmo@~ A&scx@¥\‘o‘v\. SXQ\@Q§@M lv\"\‘\¢; wyomst `\g\rov%v»g ave' blm('&\@r q H% argovne\/ds \Anvc\oee.m cejcc‘3 me vw)es gm 113 @C~pujovg iij+M b

iLl

RE!‘€DNS YO\{(§\U\\\N 136th \\)K\T Qq)p\iuff`\‘°v\,'jf»\€€¥ 3€\/\@ 5'\<>€¥1 \<\waC)/\g lwlvz\/\Ho na\@ des/wes §ng lle evr¥`\£\e.mc,»{@ be, ca\e&sec\ immediawy Rom t)nc~c€w¥v €c)\\,,cum§ ewov\covs decis€ow 0(§~+\4@}\06%\1§)&3\‘¥\‘¢.¥ Coo sir L\e\o\o Covw@yexas ~ `TMCQQ)~J\~G@C\BM\/lq\ £\\)`peczls 'cQ\)x‘£w c\vw)*€%vt\?s'jr md chiij ic]mrwcg avl OKl>E R”a.s well,: T\MCQuH‘é%;Msse§ Jr\/L¢ !\pp\i@w wm‘rg €o: €o\\ mib €eu`\l li)c\`gqu€ov{/X\/m¥ req\)we.s an ifvv\mer)m+u?dcw wuq+vow/_ k am) a @wm wgmvu]fwt'jr\/\"OYLDER"+Q vevusdv\/L¢ case fmb d mm iss `ljr/ m ves(v i ec) '&o emma Weaccoracg GC'WLVW)MM WQ, Sgs+ew\ 06 ;)vs)rica¢.'?m ¥\ntz reaso vz, l

\~es pec¥§\> \l\v\oml»\e&)pmv\c Coov\r`\v\`\j\s au&\/Lo'ii*\§ fin amew((~cd v

“\'vi)a\ w`£X\/\ july Jm §No\m my `\Vlvlo£€\a

v 40 gm \oc\qw, nom \L\»\aX l cum Mech m%$e\¢‘é’§tl `\4 \¢\c\g 0 § a$pams\,\»€v\g\,is\/\d€dwmvg qy\,c) @oe)'s \/\e\p jco pion m`\"¥b\ mg ®\Mg dQQ

549 €Qm§‘~ lg _Cu @§Ckakw way `03 §b(ce erovn SCMQO\ bg ammch a)\ao n€vw` Mm+§€de.¢) \nev.-

‘ se'\%,.`\.a¥evl\og phosz ca\\( wuj wc(¥e m€owv\ec) ijr\/m§po\o\'\csewm/\‘(s how any (11`¢~1}|3 by (~ovc€/ hanna was mem iv\ves\iga\wv\ bg a \}3@&§)§1; s)cci`veyv\w‘¥;f& s\/\e exp\c£\vleMe Mose p'\)~ \)UC$QV\AM‘¥S:)CM Wan te%w(aqq\m§ \»\U w`\\lls‘m\r\ac) \Lo €\`\e wesjwain£vzg orc\arch/qim+ mc,<€\)w.d\/\N 5\/1@_ exp\qi`v;ec) +MQHML§&) pyosec) l/ic+ivq, 1-\-¢4' c)@o\c/\/dm m my\m{"( ¢-}\4 (_d[ p\'\'\`\c)> l€ She()ié mml 61126+\4¢&0»'5€§\0)¢ `\Weed/Gldvemwoo\b he jral(ew away ,MH w\C~e

QWY<)¢€S v 33de mo\W) ‘ €Xy\ai‘n€c) Wq\` S\/¢e 1/10$ \`oee m mmii‘e<) wHL\ me€os 5 `u< QQOUS CL)VHM*'

Mch , quvv\c emo<)gb\ ch> know m vuj w¢\\ aw)ju¢)ge ny~{wuc c\/\wac+w eca WJQX)I£'~)'M§ WL€‘v\,'\W< MCL\)

bag p`\&!z o@J;\/u;‘_ she was coerced 1¢0 €\‘-le majorde ov()eraqa€ws'¥m€.l(§ she c)id no’r. ski

wov\<) WQ'\¢M)\Q¢S\\Q zinth powchch ~&\mlc gkq mer!e) nap/199th p¢\y 00 f

how VM]\T“AQ QU L>\Q`C 5€‘\10\/!)€5 oc€eve(} 1¢0{>6\9 Ou\l WM)( E`\`\r\ €XC\¢\u)/\fj€ god last Jm §§ {Q~HM\' ‘

l 5 ,

mer

<‘>rdww |\Q¥Qe s\/\Q @`\\eb Jv\/»c£(o‘vde<, pob\\csewdv\~\s pcu‘<} com house cmt am J(\,,m m3 Cmvi\l .T\n\‘§ is \ww \\\ega\( , Qub\£g scwm&s 0§91@`\/1€€) ucsj\miv\ 1149 orde\§ CLgrcil/\SIt \m€[ L\)`\R €)< WJYQO¢/\ W§ ; aqu yp\o\€c Sewavc\s Jv\/\J¢e<)t\emec) \?Le,{ Lv\ case S\/\L 5063“`@ '¥\M“g HG‘(\A[QM) m RC»sM/L \-Q_s¥\‘@e> n mj\pe\/n\(j com ,c\/u`\c)¢w w(\\ \edam\ awag.[ §'\3 mca/hing vvw\\ only {-w e. wi+ness ,a\so \oeev\ im"+h%"`*uc)?‘~lv¢a§$¢es \1339 gm ws reqsovl,.’c\/bo; W`»‘c €o< Cesmqfa ge Ll/m%eg f\"LL),S.QA ¢§\C\%’S ` . REASDN#?>., U._ ’ \€ ‘iws$efz fd" ' l ’ 0 ' E».\'¢J.em_ce._a _

Ov\ jum l‘LZOO‘L l\ po\\‘ce dcjr€d\lve,¥~£n ('9~! lo§\li'\\airea\, co \"¥\/tsd/wme L`V\ vv\\`vu), 0\1(&-' w 90\\9, w`v¥\mov\ asecucb\ a)cum;`»lg se\'zec) m3 pusom\ dowvnev\is@rim’s mem aw) So¢ia\ n Sc-,u) rig caré) m`r\Moo¥ e('§`edd ve comele Csow\ my wi@e.,»w%\'\'\ ma\\`dous lv\¥emHooHum CL QG~\SR $sr¢\¥eme»j:jr»(vwm €oc evidence ogdyls¥ m e,‘,¥\z said WLI(§ l b `\3 v\o\ imva m made r’€\ S‘¥r&\umevd‘,"'l woo\b \/\.cmc a\olf o@jwoosble". lv\ vfo\cx\c)v\ OW\L. ng\p\\ CoDE, § 3‘\¢0’1 am) +\m FOORU Ammdmcv¢}/w\¢.bc\/\ provides¥\/\q’c\:T\/L¢ wka 6\1¢1\\ k e, §ecom `\'vl lr`ne if person st Y\oos<>,s pages omb po sessions §mvvm\ @yweas'omble se\`~mm,m scmws‘U.S‘ co¢\)sr,amemc).‘l`+@ Qw) l"*“¢ \ /\ Wfopm\\‘~ow o 9 q)ropu)cg is umlawé<)\ ‘\€i¥ "\s wt».\\/wu¥ *c\/m owned dthch COV\S€VL§(:/Xv\\)\`o\€€¥lovm ('rTX» Q€vw\\ CGDF__§_?\_.Ol \56\1 L\, 53 illng V. 51ng 890$01 23 3?7 . lnvesjc\`gc\¥ul \l\\\o.rreq\&b\b md w§§e"`§(r l vl@eb mg U).CGJ<); 1 wu\<)`\i\w L\’c) gojco \M)S ` o€€§ca, amd me adm\ €‘M exchamgQ}/":w€vcjr jco \`/1¥; 0 CC»€»L@, omb ham/nl ma+o cong Cess leo acxbv»_'\e 1662 v\o{ comw\`\lr., 1 sai¢§:" No:' Gn R¢QM¥N; QQCO.Q) §§ lfmhdlc\,:;\\

`Q¢ \T\GU(M() 009€*\\'§“? § w ' »' A_~. ladder `\Jc €row hhs w£('e P\cs.t\\mméo.~ \S`\§{q,¥§m o€~‘r\mFOORU P\vwmdmw\§; o

ié`,-

acasowsmrAD?_ A‘ ms wti die make M km)u) {`olM£ \'\/wc} hullch LHD CQSM@CWUL(;@@‘;¢G, \,.\5) 6 AYYOM cow»e\~m»\ ama m m~+mca\s@S-Mmmm OLMM).,, Q» G)\AQX else 693 {wve,e\~iga{v l V\\\aveql 'lrc\\ you aboo{'yood ID,?, /\ . £<`mwm‘co @\“:\`l oo‘c scm pe.movk €0, WMO\,)U;)\€ hew WWK WID‘»L§ nolo hm$ no k §°‘*"'"‘3 J'Y° '">&°Wl ur ama 1\'1€ €3`+\¢1¢£\ `1\) 30 be ab\e Jfo cash \m}) cl/)e'cu (sz 415 »\7_) ,

¢'_ 1§ lms\/\aé m3 cm~&<,_am§ er €a\sc sjr

32¥»'\3 deeroa`}\ni Lwesjc`\qd@! \I'\-\\M€q\ \\u§ \>e@o\e“&\/»Q.Cool)r, `\<;wuowual§ `\Mevl\\omllg, heées’wogec) maj immem,cmd owe (§cxvn'i l9 as @e\\[w EW lois €qlscjce,$mdvrg a)\nev\ 3m cow{' asked \/\"\v»;\"LC- he mod a q bea\ -Jcmé a @\1 wm \tcev\se iv\ex¢\/\av\ae. €oc %\/,@cov\€es;¢`m) h \\“ed a TY»\:\\CO\)'~:\$Q\ w Y»€é \'\`\M Q' bid 96\) mm ang promises imc/ng c\ien+,? j\€gou Cov_\(m..l'\\ \ecw.L 900 alpvm,l(`~ geo CoansS,'f`\\ give 300 500110‘ and ? \)§¢) you gas/L\abw\.[m‘< ID g Com} as SoovL as _ \q.-Lwa\\mc\ (v\"d/\e `<900{?. " _ _ A 41 @OM‘QW\QQ( i£#l W¢S mm bacu¥\csx\) .(c,uc:.cv,.‘\~n). LLae-~ 9€€30~'3\» \ l€ irm im\)cs’¥\gecause as \Qn_ imws¥€‘gq&)¢ \mz, is inclined vl<\¥ jre 90 W+ ~erng§/. 'l€ iv\\)c’§\\`gd¥os \/m) §aid jr\ac 1ric)‘\'\/\, ¥\/\`\s CCLSQ was é¥$\mis§@()» l\v\<¥ ~¥\qc '~¥\.'\)Hx\§gog‘\>b)p\@c°$€c) ¥O$Cuj"\$ ‘jf\xis\: Y¢>,s gm Rc,no'€, 1 sew¥ people.jw come hamlin com€essi\/lo¢¢rss md s\Lo\e, hisl¥$ money alias kec) |n¢w\ §§ ha fuka f 1433 icc mwa&dea\»§mr}a(\\is dw`»\m§ \iccb1s€ 1dx€x£hab'c,je€om§+a'\emev\xf) §wslv \1,@ UGM aaeyj§ ijc,. \oujr al}lre\' being cw~mc)_`m€€v\mj\ml&dm{lwg l reinwa his 1\), aM 1 j(o\c) him lr\ux\ Uv\ 9011/§ \Lo dep 4'\/& \/lwasnmmjf$,» \JU"¥.I Uu)¢l 10wa he . Comp\u`~web 1re me,Y/ceso&c) J}MJY\/lewm going +o raped m €o¢ my illega\apju`v\`ke§ l QQ\QSJv)l \jr§, Cmd l"l

"` - sm\som; mcar<¢\w'uu@ umw - 543"6 CC\SQ S\/\fl>\a’ 4)€ C\isvv\'\%€d: `T\/c`\s (.s 4\)1@41\)45 CLS 45\)@34\°9¢1404 is aw@£.4\;w€v 445\{`€(4 ll 54 c0w44 cowv\&\4\§53 555)431&)55£ 503qu ag4w\3 nasov\a\@\le, moo\&\nw c Qoovw m qv"»443 €0<044\‘c4c¢\`5w\4s@v1&)c5av13 p@r§\)v~eb 42§5@59(@¢)\/»€¢\,\ is q pa€'$om\ pm\a\ew\ ' 4\/\¢4@050\/\ 504 55541£1¢“ co'v\\)\`cW (:<>rau(vnc 4\/1@4131?3 504 dome/445 Avu) 14 lqu 4\414\§ lam 504'30\‘459[ umw pamng 06 5@40?0@‘43 because/mw Ovle 0590¢4\)v\`\4j. l ~ 5 mm pron 44 "\vL ¢L' new, O\W] M\§ 44\"0\\( because `1‘40\1)44».£.54 450\444€ \1"€<4 iv\wv“jf' 1451 6@4€\¢\3<\\¢»44@ 544\4\®40 <;\ veva\rso.\ 444\5 gasech 41505€'»/1949 0st €`q\€ €.455' ~_ wong 40 0` 554 acouwicko,x @f 9<4\\5 40 moved W§ovg 14 discova 5€4@\.f 45 4455\/»¢1@ is QW, :M MHQ@LM 244 u.s. /03..55,€4.'3‘|0,7-‘< L. adv '1<¢\(\55);5./155<;19 m 0 9 @a\se ev%c)e§am\;g4\/\Q 5405¢\)40!( 04 a\\ow\‘-mg stcevs`den.c€ 40 90 wacova 044€\' 455 plose¢o4ol lewv\$ 444 9 515 >L,\:io\¢xj(€§c)ue Qloces'»s 05\401,11 014/44\/14>5 uqu 513 cw.c,.)mwl Cc)uv\sc \( prow’co:s cmc}juc')q g mem am) mm amd/1648 545/mw Kmow”4\w4 450 Lux_ves‘c\\gdz>/ \5` \\dm\ gave a(`rql€@ 4<),94\‘1/»/¢04/¢"9 ,- avu) 44 was igmo/e)&>{j 544 0 445 mm Achl~c ` LL;§_. o PRquva P'roc..$h‘r@$\`OQ/Qev\x)am4 mos\L 5a 940'/?41() amato 414<4\,(@) when evl’M/\ OL irwing 4b 54¢1404'£;545¢6@4043an4§ immer 5a54)eev\4551450\4¢¢|19654€@9@.30{€1’444" 64 ‘)I 450§ prevev\4i‘v\3 443 piodudiom 54 41\‘5\ lv\ comcunm4 \1404¢15’0¢/\ 04 515¢\5 UQ) 0 HQX. wa\. Vm¢"(§€€ccrq\ Ms¢ondvd§' The 454544304¢€ 343 9mmme cch 10 ‘co~f<),» 400er WP4' md SS N cm$ Q&w445343mm54)@- 5445 411 \45),1 xeques’veb mg couv\$e\ 40 054cu`v\ C\/€deml 40~\»¢0\124(4{$ 92440430'44 404 COuwse\ 4040303 40 054<4€\/4 slid/4 €V\`c)evlce MIBC Bqn K»{whe m 45 504€\)5/\ 550 0/5;¢404¢) m4\m41 was gaf 455 04 450 h\sco€{msc §0550445) 493 a \€e.¢, w 455 mom(H/»is M+cw\ §u¢-\m`\'& o 5 Cu\\\om¢§s\/wd\$ 5@"<;\<54)4£\)4,44 ca4 coqu ©r&z~< qu€ses§ cw\} Msvvb`@sscb.~l 0154\~{9 Howmb\egupfevm Coor 4‘02441\:$ whaj&€n\g\/\‘r , Rmso¢@#§: @MMMMMMMWMMML;+U\ 5 {)0\`\015@4@£4{\1 q M¢.Cm\osz\\afleM( w E4\I\ scheva ibt m{v\a,. 444 wth pu;ov\fl\ly 455 52 i\/c4ev\4\‘omll(5 sem4pec) p\.e `\v; \m"s comspimcu> 40 404\00) me.\/zamss mh,[€w 4\/\€5 ' \%

1111§1113 1=011@11111)'n116111111111r 1easoa,ll111avesllg<1lo1 mem manlle was wlllleb 601 relms¢l>eloraln‘al)`hl¢,gqoplq a111l come mla oblalm omlaual)alaly Cov\less\`om ayalmg-l 1111,111 ill/1 laispro 1111"1~,1 le "`glopl\»mlmassmmls ll 1615 wo',l 1 11)1`llcalallv1u€ lO l/wl/C llo“bl& l_vl\m$llyalal well

111,10111 l\11c1l lumps commlllmy clu\'w\e aga\asl ma l1v10w1llyl y 1`v1le alomlly §llw flaw/1613 6 el amlW 1§C011s1clml acclvv\col' 1110 lac/1 ce \I lC ll. `Vmalcom; § _;1_6_(}_§@ L.ALKeyL_ 1193 30511,..31 3611'11113-111111,111111111 1111) 1111111111111113 311111311111111)111113<1111§1111~ Cew§&& Slalale, wl lallll 113 le acls Calcalalel la 9106011 ivqu 01 damage‘lo pmpa ly 1 Fl~' 150 111 01 1111 o l aywll111{ 1110§1;1`1\113 1111011)1113\y11111) allllal commlsscav\€)llaclm 11191119 ol'cmolw pmm/1 lo comm`ll acl 1)111)1! clvcuvalalae$ reasonably calculalel l-o prooqu c dec/11 011/15 ysmmlayal lwrw\cc)l‘ale lhleal @l<)

111 Vevml am §__ 15 6 wl prova)es llaql l\yusov\ coma/ala cll'vv\lv\al camep§wcy ll 111 agrees 1111ll101/1Q©l lY\OlQ 911 501\8 ll/\lll 911ch Q ivlCOVl@U cl l\acxl MOOl<) CO VlsllldlLlW 0 llevls'c llnal \>ularms 0110111 aclm polsaamw ll\ne ayveemewl lmmllaya\ly 5111111115 0l~1v1y l'1l>11l_y 321)1111;1%5 lmmvvy lovely 911/ally l>y use cl cowspl¢qay. M%Wa A» _£_Qal$£lklcm;>l&aL Allel@ lay moij wall 1111011) lulafl ll111'1 lallvlllovls wm 01 @11)@1 l;mhl:ll'll lVl\iQ-Sligfll€‘( 'loll ‘l'lac.m lo 60 10011), l)ol;l ccllle<) l/llw\ 611/13 lel l\lm khvw`l’l'm`l ll§

l‘l

1111$<)111 an 611111111€ 1111 \111<11 j ' was mla man oll\ls 1110 allalso lolcl l1`11v1'll/1al 111 lle:l alonal\/\ls 1>11)1111$1 0 lslop ballaan me; lOlnn lie 111le ncl la llllv\,llalb lulvnlo Slol) hallmle mt lece una) lof all; ll@ 11>¢15 l>l`\nOel lawn ray 1,.:\ pusonaly l11>,0111l all/nn lll 1\l1lla1realya\)cav1 oldello lu`s people lalll; coord§,\ loll€>al l\`\lv\ anywleve 110, goes anrl lane aw€y las many now llz going lo be 501/16 my way lll“ `lese men l)m 111 lnlo my llolel 1oovn,an1) slole lny 118 money ll 1500 1151 dallws, l\nQ only wnney 511/all l/wul lo Sl)ppoll~ 1113 lavally glnvlolalmn ollX1 Pe:ngl § 0_10£§. 1510’1 l\lc_)la 51 Slall'ny`,`"TlnConsplracy losleal `1§ complel€ alllnl\`m@ llls enlm() lula _

n wll\noulany mlaence lo soloswenl lM@ll, /`>11503)1,1>111111\£0111§_3}1,02&\) pwn‘Jag‘“ ll 90\0\1£ salmnl commil$ wl OlleMC Gl,) aSchlo, 5111 l leluny llll\LV¢llUC O`l' ll\e 0 511 Ol llnLll/nny mfsusel is 1 1,500 01 1'no11l>11'l les§ ‘l\/Lanll 2010()0»v RE%SOllJll`G.lnlenllnna\ly Unl<'yylallmsl Ol)lalnel 1111 lala\ia'l\"on.

layeslwa\ol \J\llolm\'g peoplelnws coming €Onlcnvu) narass 1 ny vn e.lconlwnlwl

l\1.m and Covnplalnacllu ll%vn'lnalll llls Pcople Slole my vnan@yl 111l11al a lsa l/11, need lvvl/n

‘me,l 1 l\so lolb l11m`: Vlease,. slop lnc.l'\a!a$smnl_s( 01 X'll 150 lol\/11. pollee.c)epal 'lvaU/ll'

ana loper l luis iller acl\'v§l\‘e$:' l also\ asaecl lyn/llllnl/mr) anyll/uny ayalnsl 1112 jo 1r avoMl;§\fyS Concél 1/1?1 lle answcml llnc\~l: lle(lon°l l/mvc nolla'ing O.ngASl' m;:l 5<118 Slcl`y) `1 ll

111 mla\t Qonll\/w ln\lesllgaloc unlawl\\ll} allealer) wm w`1ll/1)0la11eslwa11anla1111l mellwul

my llllanda`s 1191/wang 1013 ll'léalc$llllel in coml~l\aoll\llmmwas vwa11eslwa11anl1

Q. 1516 112 lnlmwv\ 1300 1lll/1111111asc1ma11anlpend1`ng on cagc?

ll1 1618_<11¥1\1\1111 ll l\e lan sowell/1119 againsl ln€,_lln

innslgorlaf Sl

lnal llwa was c1_111@v1lly»110 ax~:eslwananl @117.°¢, 7- 1’1)1 d 1111 wl1111l ymow)§ +11¢ meal was made,-Yu) Cl/\osyes, no wwplain ls eva mcf

1 1110 §lalcsnall mc111Q@1 enlocce any law which shall al)w)ya llle 1511`11`111¢3 es 06~

_ lmmunll¢es alcll\`uvls o l ll/m U.S .~,1101sl/1alla1/1y Slale lepnj\)e. any pe1so'v\llila¢[1l>e,1lyj 01 ylope“’l°

msol\,e m@l

m Cow§l\lwlllnal mal Slalolo ry \* l,glrlg melaclec\lcxllov\ el %lue l>w¢ess Clwsc,

J`vsl l~`m apeelom 'll»`a\ o .1“\ MLLQM$E£¢.- ?3 510 ?~,“llmmeglellllaclelevx&\w! wlllxool wa“ wqu gm lm\)i‘z)pe:<.,,- ,l\‘§llceglrl ll#m 0 lllcel§ lm¢l Qrol)ol)le Cau$elo M@_.Sl“lllcdelcvldavll, l\ncg d cl v\ol pmm/ll w\`lemce ~lc; mel amy exce-pl\`o\n 'lo“llml woll`as'll vullequ m lt ivan ll lwe meal was pmpef, llm l)o e,il;g leml cvl'llw l‘l‘llie l l\la;j 1001 va£olxll;lclov\‘l 90 lmschool lam so Xdovll ‘<»vzewlllal `I éupp<)zselc) le ll ll;cm sovn@ll\m@ lms already many ls ~llwl( ol>ll@qll@m le gwle ql-lqlr lvlall msllo vlala`lwu§f\*%l/vls` loecouls'a 1" cowll de.@vl

l § ael:;@ls:§ Far<<;r<.l\\>l"mu'<: mg wm _ lS€~ll&l“@»-=ll\lrl”l ballon llwl "l@`wll mel lula anjllllveg when I was ax~res'le@l r`l\ lela-'l/ldllw, ljwsl’ was walling lof llleg le mcwle 'llm`l mis'lcll<>u'l lng-llan ls ml‘llvz.3 :pml)lew\. llv'llc le __lw(_¢ 0 l lelst Ql'lwilml l’rowlu ve alalms`,llw WW\ mgng CUS.WS 0 Q.WLQ£`HMOM$W sllqll lam l\lw wlll/.@ll~l>ul/mceslmy de,l<;g‘ l\l@ law ~l\/M fig laws OHU -lf\,lw@_f$@yl W,.____ m`R$‘lv_

SCCl"~"O w ll S'lml@-S:\CO W/Vl@l\l’ll' WSl'l>L vaeagqul/asl lmv\ v mla-l oall sell\'v\g l;o\(‘ll/l lllc/,

l grow ml lch "ll/Lev Cllw$ las lln 'll/u¢§)lo£@€cl lily/j §@Cl?lo`\fl:ll/l¢ B'la'lv. Mle'v~avl l/wl mag ll/u§w§ aga- \”v\$l m@,wllicl\ `\l‘\l tola`lv,s (er process Ol lo.\czl(:(zlllgl?lq§lllzl\ Cflll ll¥ NBUSW '\Ts D\SUWY lOFN m well wlls§lv@lm. mg pmsl)al/ll~l@ v:blc;llew e)l`r'll/r,a FUlJlZTll llll[l lemmqu AMWMH REASON#Z Del:endavl:l‘ln Cugl'oclq l\\ml lllU Dul Ll;lme,v\.l ngewlml z ll\?lleow*lf\\ A“fl Coul'lé ll>u':se (ll= l) lsc<~e~llc»'n‘ _ »

Sl flew W‘l`lll$l`\'l wgl°ll§)z m COW\ Yl

A(l{<,le 3?/,_»,0;3 ellesz C¢ lwl{l im mm el (#Ov Mllmlz.lwll%$ Wl fm l\Mllcl'v»/zevllj~” llB® log § 900 ll/lrl§@lw\amlq laleme ~l\/M; de lew,cl

`ll/w S'l, l€£c;lm llch w\§' comem\l?§lllid sep llz““" Vl$ll'@l VMlng C\Wl l`WlfGW-Ml W»£`lllvl?l“‘$lm"l’@ll `l\/lew\ Mmllzlq£l”o_l§e,lmwgag/ wax l nol 'lwa, \'<>\)'l slae §alecouls€. ll naval l/aqppevldl;®vb$ey)lcvv\lw'{ ll( ZUOB,

l’L

3§&503§§‘ 303 Gl§[lll'§l§!é`§§ll; W§ill' 4 A§§31 s`111§ee111111011§1/110§611§0311,§11111§11.112.121333 alo;§31113113311131§101l111 01 l#o,lese 6103 3 0§ §113€ 331131 wl§l1 60311§3 l\13 60313113§ § 1 13§§\133311333 cws&sl/l@ww 1313 1103 511313 1333 91 3111-33 311§13§1§31§333§\1111>¢1113 1331/1§1311313 13103\131115§01§¢3 111 -§\/11¢ 3013111311§ 1§1\111333.3,1333 3 313333§J 3133\13131>€13'1333 :w% 33l l3 33 3131311§ 1133 1313 \1>11§ X 13333§§33 §33 311 6111)§<13131§1"3331 ‘3331>1113 lwasv1§ wood 33§~113§131§was 1 § §§11 1313311§3 §h\l 01§;1§31)/1316§31/131/1§1'13331 1333 1311133¢.§33:1 30 1313 lee§d 11,0.131<1 ~ lq§101)1 11§113§1 cla 2§_ 3333/13 32 Ol was clad 3113 13131`1§11131/1§6\/133§3 33 \/313 1113 1031/311/1§¢113 §v1§331111l1`31/1 §§01§33 50131§11111 §01 111/1331113§3 13131331113113 `1$ 3`1$311113§1303§§§1 1111\11)33(:3 3331/1336 3\11111§1€133§ C.C l) all§ 'l‘B 03_§11113 310 l 566 1233131 1/,5£1_1'£1’ 5056111 23 6§9.,}\1§1\_0§3_3_§__3,0§§§11 321133 C011s31§1131l;1 311)1311`13@1 §\1,13;\ 3301933$331 6333§\03\113§3 `§3 1111 31111!1 §1;33 O11"11111/131-l 3§§331$3. 1133/ess 33131/111/1311§1/1131§ 3-§01 111>:111311313.’ 96§31131111§ §313‘1§3 1331-3333 1s 111 clem \)1`3§31‘§13310§3§€)<<1$ slzx§u§e. 'A3§13l3 w 03 1311 311111. 310 11 111011133;"` '015333333 become 0§ 031/1311” l§qu'§§ov\ §0 se‘§os¢.` §§11>_33§0/13111/1:§ 311111111§¢3 63311113 §¢,\1111$~,1;§ 1103 33 §1§33§“11§131/1 16111)33§1111131%11111113, 113va 1311 c 0111\11§1113§ 1113 11316 l>< 3131§1<111;131)11331 al§€@l'l l3 _BM 1`11 alm §0 1111 §111§'11@1 1110503)§1‘111/1 €01§1111 03(11111' 61§1;\13111€3 33333\13 §3133111 <3§§3111§3 1311 1311/111 §§_1; _Q)r/zdmm 1115 la §§ 1151 sw 231 1795 @m 1133153331 300/1113 333§133 Clp111131/1-,l'\/13 63333 611)1)3<1333§30 111 §§11 31$§11€§ 0331§'§ 313€1 333113111111_9 §\,1.11110$31;3§1011 111111'111;,§01111,13 lC§lMl1¢g §1111 111.l111c1 ®1133131 1101$111111§ §0011§111¢ .§3_7~.0,_\_1>§`3¢1311111111131§ 3101131111¢1)/13 3331/119 §113§\1.31 1113.1311)§1311 1131'1111111§§0 011'§11'\,@ 3333 l\O §§141:31§ G§lfm§'aal 313€@331`11- '111¢%~§01§"-3 ass@l§$ §§/1.133 1113136 0§311111%1§11»;§§ 311§11\3§ 110111 '§313 110§31133 1`1111111 l 31111111§319 11111111§|3$ 1)103313'§33\/1 15 1331/13 1333 5§11§3 3311§31/131 01'§10§31}123§ 313 33 , 1733 am 1)1/1001111,'§§'§3'§1’01111\3§111313313‘§§¢1§@_,5@11-§11133 333 3 11§1'110'§ 6031'§ 333 110§3§111133 33531‘51'1@§1`0-11 §31311113 §11@ §§4\3_ 313 1111§ 3111/1 1133 . 13 .

W£[i$(i'ii$ Y'(ii’\ Céiii\iiil ii€ T¥W \aiilli _ _ chsc €oi dei cbiwi i\ic i\iziig=iwigi\i' YJ’€CAUSB UU€ Cow‘;\iigi iiiiqi'cd iiqii M vioiqi@i Jc\/ig §cpciio;ii\ow Oi~ POwei docii` wig oivui iii/iii Oim/‘»ig iig;ig ifWJ iq obioii'iicimiiwq Wiq wm i

§ bibb aci 173 fm revevs@Z/) limiting mix geieg§g'i griii i/ii§amg i'i’wig iiigi?\"gs iiiisiiiii

Coiwiloi Appe,iis`i (iggimi aiiw\iii)§§(mis iiiiui ®vigi. Sc<» Ngqggbv$ big% ’L

1 S'\)i id ‘i`liCTg>¢ iiW-' iiousi*d#~i:lsii>isi]¢ Wi‘i,\%i me Ji/N _'_iX_V__$iL.`iL@Z’/l$ w ZLMW

Uc)l AW iiwsigw iisi iiiii .i¢'igcci\)'s£ ~i\/ig LOGiiOi» Ci\ mi\/iq,i i\Weci\ 5 \Si/ioiii gi Jegimggi dwiigig i"i___,g §§ UWOViSiiiUiioi/il\ iiwcis void amici amici iioi~appi{iiw wwiiwigi iq ivigii civyigwiuiiriwasiioig 31 0\ g iii/ib ibm/giLi?g, iiix;cii ‘i?§ ;ii/igcq)i)eii e§ cuqi)gii ii/giii)gcqi)sg i’im izqisi Qim g mweii

go viiixi 0 il 1a big i\iii"e'iw)e)ii'wiigvi iri/ig Siiiii dici vwi misgii ace w§ii-iliiioiiei iii quigim ii , CCiWH€ V\OiWUI/FZ- Co~gs'iiidi€f adm-iad mild(/gpmgesS.-) T\ii i?wii'?ieg\i*€w Coqiisiaiwq

, 3<\Mi'i l$,'l§ is wsi S’\>gedii iv iii mining m fgje cigci i\i`\s cu§wqgwi im i\ig. iqiiqiigvig gm~ l `

SOVL$.@> `i'iig iiei)s‘ivw gmi/bfi \‘i\i“`@~§ ime-551 Wl@>v’iiii$i¢mt{ii/w`ds wng ie.ss Vi`ezsu riiw W`i@i i%$i¥` '\'ini‘\i€ iiuwi im§j>@ iv'iiiizii ivii\/icii‘ i£viiihi' o@‘iiiwi@l@~i M<

elgin iio\n saw gs gi psogcgic)mi saig@iiqiw; iv'{. iiiisvw S'i~fig

limb/wm A ’ “ “‘»' " \i Tiii|\icoi)ili Aizi)sgi> lis mscmio ii“)r'iiws‘°iiqi

. amsch POY< QKE\NTEMG'THE WR\T

TW. M\`u\ Com'¥ °\v»¥~c.vd\‘@ m.u.\lj\ A\@wsu`% ;'?'%s bcscr@\i@v\. being @me,@@ (»`11\,5 a evid-emg umw (’~u\ amax md se fn)'¢»e QEW malz<;\"ows iv\¥m+\"m/z' ~&1) <)L>¥rdw a 60le s§ém/i, UMMC@\ cmweg¥, (M) vCOla&i'Ow 6{€6041\0¢0@0$£0§ W,v%o\m)¢;m/\§ 0 €“¥M@,. FGU \Z`U,. Fl'\?Tl<&,v SLXTH,ANO FOURIEEMU Aww,mé lmv‘s¥£lg&i`v@§¥ \'Yw., 41 U. S¢C‘ A,§ \‘IB 3. '

` ` MM£§EMM_&LM&MMJMCOLUM£ECOMIUAM\¢ bmme ` ‘\)G\)'\r Uovm. M3 C\Sew} has knew §\Aé£l£%od'j €ow.§)ou`\' \7 Wwvv§bz$ (CW)_‘;“}‘ l%); ?\’»UMUWR”. L)@'\?e \M‘Pv\is me swsz SQV%.,_Z‘ZLZD(JB, C£¥LSIL], lc~c?){mom.s%wm\, wl.zoo‘z) W\Lc@wmse v. we mcg\/¢.+ pos§zwg wm Ws w WW§ wmst wsi wm i\/LCUSW~`V ‘ w

10%€0<‘1:4,\»1)\ l

-.»~~ §§ IMAL §QUKIS H;()!\JL` D_DL$: swiss [- §§ CL§§_E#X,(\§<@Q¢§ o Q-. THE COUW AYK§ 1 g=oes's_¥m G~C>@M~Gm ‘¥W;: am ms imm1 gang 473 sand TR\M UEUNSEL`. Ye£,?ou"s' Howw\.. ¥\<,c§@- e; \/mm \Q wmw$(%s md WCC`(GI l'l,"t 'Q)f\'\'wn was amssz

veasov\,léodv{*r mcmHo %z'£`mq_§¥uV/CC%Z@,\\'l;LA)LH JMM¥U mom H gm»m v vL ams

5(,3\4 mem no%d,t;¢\o<.e vw\ mm 9(' wet a&oc,'\ ma 32.01§\_ §M.m@ n cow\s@\ '\'&e:\'s re irm je\w~e was m m,/)\`=<;Wwevw; amd de was

`\ll@$,q\[l.) A‘a¥m`mu§, \`>Oar\méw§use$ M`¥rfo;g`t¥u plans Yz'a,$'\€c¥€r§| YM\’LM”@CU'£‘

TMQ;\-qiq\ cow '-‘r a§o@§d<§ G'k é)isci'efkfwvl wlf)w Mc wm 4 P*C€@S@W Jw pro v\,`zh,. ma 04 pse€e§§ L`OM\HMS(@W 5')\/)€€ five ¥'egfm/iinizg as IMQJ@>’M) . R¢»e;.~vgq.\ ,\".s mem fled M'Lw(..m Jr`m ~¥w@,§ cove h vpo w mele reque.§jr, €a§i.s~ko Y)mm\d-e am MU §H€=W Fo md demapéw'e WW

- does v\£)'?rs»y)emt add vvac'k\rs{w@ £v\@\is\n_. 0ij C¢L(w{€ ewovmo 0€ COVLCWS"`°V“/`"°j' NSC"M"°*’

mem-wm Obvc¢usg 900 had au 0 (1~3@@€ 'f€ggw+s Q££lmw} +@ gee fcruew~c, le '25)“ mm cowwss\:. (dmo€ m quegc&~.ms is+\w’c\u was no’v\`v»€ovwed" w\/wa" cwch w\vaa¥¥n‘q,\@ms:$,za)

fm yanez u~~. sw ,55'9'51;»1' w M», w p@¥£{-eow@`£@& M~s&m¥@%@~v~g mw ' dow §@W{mced ¥o lr;(`lz. EMW,,: TMSU@ ew}e¢e& Wro OLS'\€()U\@H¥" 616 W¥ Ul/He¢’s"fzm¥ Mc, €mg‘ 1355 L/r WLQUGQ~‘Q,A\LW'W ver ca

./ :_._.

6£61551115 F0155'5111611165‘ §§§E \6§67§ AQY 1` 3661/777/'§777777 \‘7‘75§665§,1 <3161611§57> ~, T§w, 3575667<161§ was 561'§'1‘1'§§6_57 `§~'c> §1<1§16_.<)16 amy/115 1 7777777 because +7”7 777777"77`77777777 71765 7777 §'\"7’”’7_79 P/`@S~€vi- 1757 060751' TQ»§~ .500& 561‘166 176_115c 667 36 01 116 6 §§6661§6 o§§§§ 76 757 3106 §6§§156§§116159 15616555111§1713 §§155155655676§§15 51§§11613 §51655566§1§19 §§656§5§51 661<:7171 171§§ §665,5155 0§§6¢566 §517<6551 506167115§§§15116655§653 65 §57 16<617 5 11§156\6 §1175§ §751 755§§1 §\113561§6 5161117 §§1.1 575§~56/16751117,1 610§66/666151 6 §§15 pm5-6111p§1z)161 e§ 1111/1107551/15'5 01151§ 1751§§\6 3<16615§161/16-¢6§ §5167 §§16.1§?17§§§§1575 §5616.-- §367§5' 73 751 €656 661651', 76§15§ 5 `Z 030§:§6)6 51~1“661§7~615 167§§21.1§7 S C.§.§_§;§&L 6666666667§6 M666111167:ss16101z111/615)6 515111;16 16161;506§1 `§§11516163 16 1§117156§§€77€51&7 \§777167€1§>§3 §§15'{)0§1`55575`6)07 §§6511§5611§§6011§§§11 517(,)6'06567 717 676/67 507/7551/1§’§§6565 15 615 506666§ §51§61§; 51610661<1161<3 517<63110676§5551619 5§166951 666/1666 161@,1.1 §§11: §\6715§6\65§/1§ Lr)§§§m§a§ 7665751§6€1§\§\§€,6§6167 1§>§§177’§'7§95\7(§'\766§7 I63741M_th)6M1§,. 437 973 257 77&§ (Tez< (§765 ,[§W§%17§§17675§5715767‘6§`561555561§€§§§617 §z> 717:17/11‘65516§0§ §66"'5’ 777777`§§7~7 706"»‘79<@ §717 576571'7 §1§\156. 775 5517116§9 w7§71§§61 §61/1§16661§§ 6666)61757657 716 §571 77'§7§7777717§ 77?777777'7776§“ 061§`6"§51111171'5 75 § 1161 § §71§6: v1. §Mq 705 167 §<7. 670 §(66,6 77}7\> 70§§77707§7717‘7‘§7) §§1¢ §\6170.§ @06§§6151675\7 <7€;1/1/1\§66_67 §§6666167667666£616~[6€6®<6/ ‘§7’7@ 5§<§§0§€ 0 § §1§171\`§7§1§166115 §111157 QXQ§ 16151'7`6§11/155 §§166757~€616751.§/17'§/151671/167§§>5§61 §5666166 C17/165776}`6§57 6067‘1\7§7§§17'§7“6 §7/1§<€776716§606607 \\6167~15§61163,16§" 111 LQ,§§_L{.L 166 1 §17476 366 366 666 16 51 j 667177777 C777771717 665 776177717 77777767717 777 1666 ~61'16 111617116 661-16 1665 51/:7 67‘611611`5§6.§ §§;3 §§15 1506 713 6§§§61166516 §166 301/153§56115§§/`§10<6; §,16§§§66 6655§57€5§§55§; §77‘"/ 3777 7%§5)&€ 7/677“5\`361£7 §§15d 17573165)16§’ was 656 565<217 511167 §§65661555517§6676 0766617 §75'5 561 §~156\16/161§17666 was <7.76<7@1567 676§66111` SSLU. 755 1165 §§11`$ §75§6 765/156 §§666,666)<66@66, 664 w \7*"5"717;§' 377 g 777 25 207 (M§’ 7(7777 77777“' 77??7 7757777§16 ®67§1‘)§511'\/1 7_w555 667 Swom 70 770/70 77 LU’§§ 0 777§77'777 767 §?@\77777/' 0§6777 77077 777 »:§'\‘/5 §75§17§1701'656 77 76661~666756 CQ$@, §§@7`€§751617§6;56711\6 YMOM 557/13 C@Wp) 7607/61 OM 771576171'7‘ ill/116 ` 777 T‘X‘ 5777*7777757 577 777 3376" §§ 517§77577§6 777 §§1<1\65§ 776/131 §§176 515 6§656 5 656§\166.6

'17§>

§PASGNS FO\Z CRM.\§§\N(Q THE\§J\?\[T

§§§§sac§§§§§ §§§§§ am §v§§<)§§l§c§§§§§§/ §Lo§ C§)§v§§>l §§ §§§Su§)§§§lwl §§a.§§c a§§§§l la§/§?§ §s es§e§§ha\: W§§§ql mw§lv@a §`§,§§§§§§ ca§@ amc §v§ §c§:§l§§§_c/ §osushiv§§§§@,q§§§;¢.(.[ cu§§$ Mc§§ h c§§lc§§l§ l*v§cc/o§§§h§§§§\§ecc§§)§§ soc.§§ co§§§§)§c§§ §§l~c§las §§§;§ l~»<~,§§§§e§ ‘b§:§ §\§Q aj§§ §m/§/§c§f\l§§/§§ \1§$ Vw§v§wf m§§§§§/§/§§ §`Y§§§ §§ §§§/Lc§§v“§€ 111 `_\‘0/` '§/,,.`_ S w ill 1536 (:*§=€§ Oul l`v“» §§§§ §§ZO): Tl§§ wmli §c§\l; h) aecl§A/, §§/§,l l§\§§m§a? mae I§c¢§ c§,§a/§§l§mfg§@ 452 s¢§§ §§ z§€§/\JCLM§’S' §Mf.>ll`§ldc§ §D§ V\§zl§§ ‘S§i"§l §§;§§\ C(_LS M §\A§§ U`~SL) R§,R\S§lm `#~’@» l§mvc>ss§\)h> Cld‘l“&.§`§§l£ COV¥\§’V§§SS§§V§ 0§ nw §:&§5€ ®§§)-P§\M€.

FUMWW§CL§ D@§CC\‘ Tl»@$§a'h'/ W\L§§l Qa§‘»§l/l£l§£§§v§§ W§"w§§h§)§§ \1'§§,§§§§§'5 Cc)§/§Se§§§“ of C\§§'§dd§/§§. Tv§ jc\§c~l Le§a §V§§§v§§cm exac§ cl¢§§a, h§§f§a o,§§cl pm h §ro§/a/o.ll§§§¢lc§dc»§ c§.§ §\/§a;’§ §§'§ §M/§ §§v§c§y§o§§e§§§§ §\,§@§§§§§§@§§@§ €\l@§'l l'§<‘)cl lm§§e§§€€l l\/L§l/ILWOM§\A£§ML§@ §\/\§a,e cl§§§em§§o§§w§e§§§l 2007 l was CoO§§§. §§§La§ OU§,§de_ §§§<;,,C§~§U as CL§M.§/§L§_§§§ g §,;§§’ mm Ww'§/§§\/§,§§ovv\ §/Wc§/L l(ll, K('l(?"l.~§@ A§§'ll ‘§jiOGi. E§lljc.all§§c.-§§o§“§\/§§ §\/\~N@ clth am icm 43 l§§wwe§"`blf) maj F§§g§ §n§lsa;@ §§a§§$a,clah §§ am S`W§§§§§lle§§§§vmv§§ ~w§

REA$OWS FM’< QR£\NT|MG THE \A)Y'\’IT melv\~ww}rjv§wm dv\h`) place sjtc¢W. A-é M %w.§< casa-y fn w 17 s wl§!>“c C.Tex.» I\Wr CM gm Ci/m§ kg '1000[};@-¥£@,€'@§§.? Uve,.€»%m§ Qyp@q\ gm m icm ‘…a 1 C()U‘{lcé §%Vvv'$€§&L §§va `L\M;Ov‘w\cz;£fl"ol/L was c§'\?SWL»i§é@./) 413 UVI.`§F\?¢'n/)€,ly .T\Mf '\¢MQ\CDUM @wec\` \"w (-`QW.'\/y“j ~H> sus.¥~\jw 419 palm H m~¥@omj`m 451 m\/\. S\"\ac Cov\/\\')'\.¢/eiw.:\*\)e`\M¢a/@@ `sf\/a.~a»co mw\is’§ Mcw(‘ "1(\/»@ ' " , @(f€mg@_, gm g{@;m, wm\¢<\,"léo §. w , 15 m;W,<]/<@@ <1\¢ ch(»€wmcé @w‘>*W/@"' \Q&j '

` S`WY @', %o.§\/\mg 0§~ §m€a\<‘m/"@m m\w~e %\~ wm 60\3\>6~@"-\1€5 bid €Mplcum~ was Yw ~ V@< hj clum‘w\<»:<\ Qm auw§)c§\`v\g am MWO€£ 1"-/13'1@

ila amf T\M§ cage ¢0\\€,¢¥3 QM S-X,;L\O\-,§»SV\,@,; ‘¥\/1@ “(\)\e$ GM` umw/19 L`Wa FOSSN¢\L@ denim SH“ UQ'HG yes ;`W@ Sp££f€'ic \”LO\M\§ w<>'~$ ‘\C\/mj’ M.&.Hegc\‘§%/J\vv\"pc)$;é Ue <§QUH wod(‘\c_): \ea §umdamw,vlm\ m wouiw \:Ov\ G{ a\;»m§;¥ “\'\/»@ »-dc@ @¥_ M)_,WL@», C`»"¥§mg\ E§L/:_SMJM-$M£L 14 513 15 L?'LQQBS)i `bvx" 04 aim m &\ooo ~\:/ +W;.,MS €)§~ lmwcv_\@g K‘L`§ 4 o.)'cM/) L)€» 5\) Wi‘~c§m'i”do§ech% Wcm {'0 QUQ&\»\. §D_QLALS_M,SM, 503 510 23 FUCT€%,AW L‘Vt@‘, The CO~W)»}) i.fM~)L §wmm +z) am A\\`\g 9;,\‘1“!1.`,@,[[,@5@¢§ a.v\, O§Qe,vx§e,oaum<] am §@\9: QT¢\CLTL,£T\M com¢

p`\q§m¥ nw €Q§Scc/¢ng M#e C¥\W a;A\sG, `lv\ w\\j ms Q, imJ&`m 've¢;o\~c),w@swww comyiam,»% Jc@ §\)'SH@ +\»»c. `vww po§'sé¥;[.@, z)@&@,.|`l¥ §§ crim ¢W’.so §§iw@ve$evv§@vbca%@ cwng +\/1,.)5 ng@ duva M§me f +W“»s C€r¥\/VM_( ~i SWU\O 30@6’(&&1\¥[£\> 601 jd/\§; `\”CQS@W RE_AS@N #-‘Q,- Umcoso M.\>\j Q-,§\\S>LQ»Y..Q@\?¥,, mud R\~A\@@ O'v» (§\\Q/

A@ve)f am WV\WGH\M U\¢z,\/Cew€i)‘(.. mm>‘\“ 3v\/w“ X‘C»Y:¢@WM 5¥'@'\/\@\/1)]€ ©GG~, iam §)\Me¢"§ a\nc)'\é am mg ‘0'3 6€~6'1¢@¢“§' Lcucbws§ OM S\oijce» The `l.C~vV, o'(vée¢@vs \ clM/L 'we,cc>»f§, w wilmiqu ~k\/m ‘l*‘f,m} 14*‘1,

A mar/19 mw)cs, HQA. 5:\/»<; o ?€€ce)rs 36 Jc\/\mw§\/\ 3<\/1€{<'€<@1§, l Q.JR\. \§~Q.&\j~(d@ adm ~W&\@©¢OG?) bo v»é,»`l woo 13 `b@a&>\z¥@ mci\‘<, mw ane@€~ec¥we, cou"m_;@\ %A@W ’ ‘J~% '

_ 150000 600 eee\.§m€ §e\w\r'\z\r /me,l mou\é \0; cu\>\e;\:zz Co\\€d1 c\)\‘<‘)`e>¢x¢@\’e 1960 W.W, ivwwcew:'q 10 010\»*0/11»0 M\sc evidem@§~s'aecw\#e§ 001 0_80§&`1101 <1£1¥01§ 1 wou\<\ 100611~1010 \pw-M_QVU\§LWQ) 10811\/001‘/@ 14"0¥1\. 1\/\\`!€3 1§€56&1@1", 1111wa 11” \`»S 1140 0\013' ‘-`@-QSGV\ §¢W“l 1"\£*€11`€9~1@€1€!1/' becw§€lu,a§ 010\1§§0£10% ev(~@ecj§€u'e. a$§ §§101_600@~ avon/061 X.C-L 11¢\?@51“/&"§1 519 `L‘>'m§` 1020/legs 001 ey"t§§\:&\§\o;§\\me§ wm 90qu 11011 md €XVW\ ‘ 101 1115 umw 00 §0100\1@€»\>00@€@01 %w@'\ raw §§’11°<111006§§§@“ 1613 000 00 5001§0 16605.1.0§600 00 Mowlé‘“) D@\W' C@'\M@’@ ‘55"' mde # 105 E€€m-\'m 1\’>'.§§10)%0 91(:000§0\ `\010,3 101/009 11'1`1§§0\1.\#`1¢10011111\)€:. 1110 0061310000 e-€'~Covv)-ee\ 000 10011€<:-1@\11 \MCM S 1 0 1111@01*1\‘/@1"*1"1' v@'\°"*"e 'Se"‘°“ 1000 00 §0\)\<<0,§\§'\§1,500§ ma §meemw 000\¢00.0/\1;'§?1"33?10 1111413~ v 11 1111 we W§Q\,.-M<¢ NW@ QQ\WOB¢ va€€.$ 00110 §QW€SQM\? wm 1605011§1, 1)010§0' \GMA\‘ '\M.\,“\eg J(C, €OW/ 009/10 Q_¢qu'1@; 1000 Ldeaj`§ 0110(` 10 \o 001 1190 ’\\;\ 1\/1611 ~mowwnL/Q)w gem 030> X 00 \n0100cep¥eé1 1113 01161 \>ecw&d,§\W}/Q:X&WI. 1161 90§1113 0160\3 10190®`\0§;/01(01€0/0¢. E%ckv`z.es$%:wua.01600\/\§21is \Ac\<\'mj 001 H-,~,~Q\ when 1100 6000061016000§0\ 1611 1)2.\\00) 000 01>.`301§\v`“' 1<19¢1'@~§6¢1 116 ere~r

Y\EASONS §@R GY!\\\NNG THE WK'\T Secov)&, §\/w;. ée.émd@,m,§ mus§e%wuh §m§ §Ma,c§e€mim§ \>¢r§m~www:.§>ex¢judmé}

§\w c§@ mm ,. ~\'\,wc\ coom§e`\§ -'e\c cc)§s we\'<, go §cv/ic)u$ ab §§ &a(yv\*v\e,§ha,c§a§@/Ld’w§

0'§'~ m§ai§` §§\`r¥\ wi§\¢l YQ\'\‘QXO la vesd\§.'(\q», de/§eiv\é/M§ mus§\`§w\:§~\‘?§~j SYQ.¢;£ §~i;c ach 0 § ow§ss'iw\.$ 0 §+va@\ §\/»;n§cw e,a.\.`\.¢§»e.{§ vib§ §c) WM ' ¢v\ §MQ_,,§Q$\)\.§ 0 §

\NU@MMQ W§@gg€o 01;@\ 3069 mam§'. Wm/\J`@§d>{/eu)iv»

w `§Le1§\/\U', §\/1\€<§14;_.-§ o § a;\\ §\LL cwcu\/Ls§wn:esi g\:\/w Wem,§§ §§e¢§ ac§§ m @)W\ i§§ §'U"vz$ UW/

@U§s¥cw. =P\/»e/faytg; 0 0 § gm §e§\om\§\j wm pe§mi"@,s$&~;§\,\»-‘L¢e. z U l~\»§,um§zz\\q L~HM.

_ dc §<,v\.@?w¢/§ ww$§ §Ww f`od`ed£@wbl@ é?rr) §q,\m §£§g; ~§Mq§l \w' § §04' COU\>'»'>'@\§ umw go Ge / 5 s wvm.\ e,m) 1‘.5, ~§\/»e. re.sx)\§ 0§ §\/LQ proce@§\h/Lg] 0300`\@ \mw,%e,em c)\')§§evm§, &§ece.sovw.§\,e~ (M)‘m§m\i§g is ap\'~o\ml>i\.i }g <»G&§AWW§¥Q wd@r'mm.@ Cow@»z')cm m §m whom . 5+1.\)€6<1&@ 466 05 b mt 5 340 C§\¢ I>\m'.éwevv§ mmws§\m§§wm mos+\»fc Q§Qec§i'\bwssl§§mm. 0 g mw§é\egj\ §\ \` m`\ UWMG\. V<,§v§@ §§ \eqoll§j \~Q.W€s`e:a/L§ m»@»@wu) `\OMS@M/§a¢§ mms gm [§g mm 1 w mm m w»c` »\@ M. M»;\m ama xavl.@,@@%m:

MM&LLEG@S 2 way §§ \1¢ uvxd¢§s§avds §§w§mow mg §o\w"im,§w§ §vrwc@v\.§, Amb §\wd’s mwo'-H'm_,

§)w\@`\€_wcs . \Ms "¢)e@m\;e,wj d€($ao§§ §o mM' I,c m\§'\mqou\i' §§ma { CL`(R€’».S; \Q};@Qsmb&\% §0 \a <’~Qp~<>/@c\(C\K€r‘j\(u)»_vz)s h 1 \>eggec§ §\m¢ CO\)\»'\§@\ §0 mwkc)~f §§MM‘.I\I~@. \wwa;§oall;" w@w'm§ own WQ \m'\<§ (CV"S'. \`\,\`$'v why 'T\/\e, C@\W\S@\ Ccvme, u~{) wi§\/\, OVVLO§§@T e§'§we g,em`s’ §@§;Q,-§l`w.§w'§c@ QO§!§§¢;,

NMML%@§€\£M §Xo-M twwgv»§@v &\m@ €'-o_@\~ M§ §\M@€ev mg war gem §o~-Mw~» mm ‘\;`\4@ mm@m.s ma\c'~§{ms \'s,. v\-zf\)¢ / . l upwth Hw§ 1 mm S§vg §v\(joil{m)§ gu@\§;;"" §MQ§ \9@ §§ae..cm @w“D"‘~`.§H " MK.CALL€GGS’. MQg\eQ/X am\bx§v;§\ 'Wwwy m\;»§vww Wl mm¢‘m.c§@?}' §u.§j ,X-,`B ~cc@§\nd\>e.l.`u\.)`mi 1 @ugts,zfs),_. _ l lhwde Ct)\i\v>`c\ dow §\mg 0\4§3 w§§m>$$ walk '§0 §TS§T§ o»s.@m' §)e,§`u¢L§-éc) \§L`€C§U§€Cl' 40 Ai§c\ose..‘\"\/w..§ac\;qy\i§ \x€,§w$@c§ '§0 Ccn\-\ mg w§§v:es$' ' ' §1/1@ s§¢dm§ §@ §£:§J€g

ve¥emmv. mouwmwm§cé C'¢+W wgbmowhdwi§mss §\/wv§'¥ \m§ fm w §z» ' de»§ev\z}» we CC,§U}`\O€ ,;4 "‘l).` '

RV-AQ@`§|S §"0§§ G.§ZN§§ §§§§§6 W§EW§€§§`

1111 Sjy§_g_' 11 MQ§¢ 201 Su§ 319 1476?5,}5§)}').-'%511!§<5»101 Q®@O);We §Wu.§ COW§ gm p@§§g 155 055'§@3§ §§/wje§w\d§cu/v§§ W~§§@‘§@ §§11,~( mw)§§'§a,§ 05\ '§\/51:§0¢15;§5 o§~ §\/1£§1§51'1`» §~05} 511_555‘ §`.5§0.5/1£<-: 0 §§v\`q§ 601)'§555§1§\11@ §1§§§`\/_»§} 0 §~ md§§;e e§mppw§ 3\?1)"\1§¢)§3€§51§\/5 §\/L.c§¢'m§ LO\S§"§ o§:ju~§ §§d§c~§‘év§ §5 50'§5 1555 §§15_111.€1§§<)2/1 §15\1 md §»'§5\5 O“~W §\“ §\§§§ §Mq 19 L§§m qpp@§§ §§15§5 "§Mm>$§ cm§s' \:)§§§§§1§1*1;§1§1:151/0)§11@1§\115 35§'5111@§55'1§ §`\caé mwm'c§ §§1:1110115 5 Mc)§gj§11`;15§\~/10’§§`<5\/\\1>1§§§\15§5§1;0%@§ §71:1§§15§ §@sms‘wccw\w\% Ov»§§ §\/11. §§»`Q§ §coo§§ Wopa§§g ezerc\su§w §53\§51§$1§1@§\5§/14§5@<51¢1\/1§@5¢1510§§®§ §151 `w\e §§ec§\“\)’a 0155§5§11565 0 § CM`\‘\%§ §m&§)§,§ [§\‘WC_O_LLMSEL_§M_E_§§M MBBSM_WML §01)\51/'\105$.

T§w\ Cc>wme§ §0§§ §@§ §5 §"~1§,1; am§§w §€<1;)55§§§13 §§m com §d 0511/1»1551§¢19 §§1,5<,1\5@_ €15~1/ ov §5§5 05 uw§§m.§.;\_; §§/11§§¢1;§\/1/)@/§ §”§x)'§sm§ §o 1511§1'<5§5 SL_O,§ 553 Z_A;O,Cio §1§151_€11‘111§’104.

W\ CO\s\q,sc§ wmwec,§§§§ M§€Qdu§`cec§ ma§o mm §Mg(j§w§ §m§.`§\/w§g§v§§>'§§j @§' §v§co mck uaw m Cewcgm§v\§ 50§,51/1,15/1-§ 1551/15 umw 001/15§1’§11\ §5)» imc-§§ec§c."§//`@ 05555§5151¢' 4 . Ex )<5§~§<€ f /_1§1 211 f a Bl@ 555 21§3£$ §C.T¢ 1&\~1`\1'1 .§5§ 19 a§‘§[§§§ ;{,1_§§'§/.-1§1~§\110,<§@§*€145€ q§<@§`v§cy §9@§\1“55/15§ §§1¢1§§§/1@ 335§~@11;§`<11/5§0143 e,§@d§§,§,@ 501 §§111115{115§/5<5§§15"§1 §50§11§§1,1 mw §LCW§ §»1¢1»5_ §1115 151)\)1711>1§ §§115.3@§~5111)”11111/§ §cs~®m"\§§ \15§$ §“153§!§§ §01;1{§§§\1`§§ ow§>uv§§s§/§§vwm §, §~§1';15 wm §‘m§§ec§§’§/@ cwsi`g'§qm@e o§cm)w:»c§ 01/5511/1'§5§/1@1"§/5§' 0\/11§€5§§§4¢§1)§€ O§ 51 pa§§ve 1913 {@, 111 '~ `i § . ' 756 3<`§7,1§(§1;;/,[§11[,‘_- 355 §\1;§1->‘11§€§ \C§‘§‘B "§) 51§1<‘@§71)>;"¥¢1§ §1315; §<) ©1)\1135§ ~§15 M§cswv\ ée§evd®w§ ‘§\x¢<,§§w$ 5551\11,.1' 15 §"5§\\1&;1 661 .;111'11§§5§11151\015§~ s§o§/,§L @€-§v\*o.§ mor§§&§ W`@L§ua§f §\\§3 §Qc@§v\§\<§'j §>mm§s§w\. w¢§S iw;§§ec§m@ 1155§5§51/11;9 zi)§;'-mo~m€§ mm§ x~@@1,»1.§§`151§m/1>;v5"@§§, $_eg 4§50 7b1/513 §)15§1§ 755 5 mt 1§" §,O'I (Tcx.‘[§p.p: §§ws§vv\. §;§L§§§/\§15§.`§ 'L‘t‘§€§, §'§<555>2\5~2§ L,.~§b§,g §15§15 \1\§1j 0 §§§/15_,§`€\)~

l 555@,511:§1-);§1‘51/1 cb€l€ec§O/§ M§w§rs§\mm§p§we w\ce,w\-M§ §@mneco 1511/115§555/1@1/1§')‘5 CU,§J§§HJ»&MMM!§¢L§L§§L§:B¢?Z§$ §c.§ 21§ (§30(555.§§§§§>; §§ pam §‘§‘§7, pa'§;{§§`cu'!§'§a&§ >{-'§"§`Uv§. fwva § m)@cs'§ec§ §v\§o/\§\ 131/131§'@ §§15“§§1115 Couv-§ Cmse,w§mc€ co§'§\/mu§e,§€cc§§ 115 aov/1551er 515 55115505 W¢\1e115w§5m §51‘€111 §11>1151 §+11 51,115§1111\5151§&‘1 101 15 \‘l) 3 §

-~ ,Mw/M/€¢) 631/31 M`W;/@zilf//z§/veem§§lwm§%j» 5 /

Rw\so§§s Po§zc,¢z§§m\)e w e w§z\§ ' ' umw §§1£ @~1111;11,\ §§§§ §§;§1)5§ § 1555/95 m§§§<':§~§§§ S®C\/L§\/§\`Wj 1, T§w, wm 511 l 1§@1¥53"§ Com§§§§§§§.§§g§ §§1;06 hcst §W §\§'§ZWQL§U A§§§ m§` M@W_Md ma 0 § MQ;§`U£WM § ‘§§15 §mv§ §§§>1 wmn§m§ §§/1§11 umw §1155§0111.§ §1\§11)/151 :`§<`»<1\€@\3\'§$@\ §‘§ §W §€‘)§"“"“' a m af)feemew§,/l €XV§G§/§§§e§§ @5§’ ec§§o111~ §§151~15-1f §11§1:§§§11§§5 5§§§'\11\5§@§§”§§; §°§§"§‘°“§@’>S`l§”‘/'1°§@“§@§§§§‘“§“"§“"q

§WL§ §§5 M§§§\!@§Uv§ '§11§§1 cov§§§.g§§m§l\o§s§§ 0'1§.‘§§11§§§1,§'§§511§§\'~0)%§555§1§ 011\0§§?5<)11111`,<§, §'c)u§ '§§®v®§¢ avu§ g§\l`€§/§.§>§) §v§.\§€$§§g¢§§§§§ \l\§\<;§§ §‘11_1:5"§ gm 1501 §§ §%’§,

T§’Lc Co.§msc§ §<§§`§eé§, 0§1151)<<@55§§§§§§¢ 0“§\5 §w§e.cuv§@§;§§¢§@ QQWU §\M__ UMCU. 11 M;W h 2 QC°<'§&U \\§§§§*”§°‘ w §B(\“ `§\"V§ §§§§` `§§\,ét»§§§ §§§5§5§ §0 0\1)§1:1§§'§ €\§ §-`€§@\/§ié J“> §er ‘§\\511§ '§\1§<; ('M/§Cee§ §§§v§ 1555 §&§§Q §V§.\Jev§§€c§§§§§§€@§§§(j%\v§c§§§m§,» §v§ fagg § §:§)1@5 G£§M,\f:§§@ a§ Mm\:'l R;;MM°B, Co§)§§@§§’s 5 215 5§_§<\1\§)€1 §§§§§§)§§§! §§ CG\W‘S€§S'\“'\§§§§g €L§~§§da§ §§ §5 so oq§§§ §1> 1551~@1'1'§ 3mva §§SSMM § O§¢§§g_@, §§01§€5 56§ §15§'§§1-{\1 §\§1`§§§§!1‘11 §1.1§£(»“§1, §Bec§uw §15;§§)§§§§ §05)§§5¢§§§?~0§1§§11§5§@§§§1§ §§111111 P~‘L§\§§§o 1111§>1§‘§5§)§§~€ §/\O§)§§§§_.g §)ee)/\, W@w§<§§§ §§/§§§5-1§'1/1.§§;§3§§)§ §W W§§§i)d,,/§U §§ ma JD..W';L€ §\§L 51;1/1§15§§1 §S/L§§ §§\1:.§)65§§§§155 , §§125 pc§§~o 1\1\~1515/11;§ §1_§§ \1\§§§,§§§ ~§W; W, (;@§51¢10 M aj re mqu 0 § mw§§>'\§w%s.\§ccm§%~e wom§§ef\ §n§§e§§ ‘§0 eou§;§:§¢.§~ 1§¢9 \9\§§,g V\VM §\,\3 §\M§ §UMW w§§§:c§£ mm a\§§§ §§§>§a §5 §@§§§1§3 _,,IVL 5§1@1§1§§14,$ 1a j Q,_§, w 515 int 6 md H`CGMUMJHWP 5`@11);7.§§’§.&§§§`§\&§ c§€,v\¢w'v§$§§f\§@e§ d>¢~QO‘M-§@§ §§§/L §§§,“.5’ C'C§§@L€)J‘Q§/§;§§w@q§/E/O§@ WM .§. SQH €W

CQ§ §u.§\§ _“§M§Q,§')p@§§m§'§{C\W§§@§~§§ ap§§v§c 55€$ COO§§§§J §§M § §§0§§§'§§§'§§\) §M§~§§W/§.U’_§ §§1..§)

1§\>§3§) §55@5&1\/11:\§§ 9§ §'1§\/1-§5§/1§1/11_5§ §:'$§1§ m§§_ §1159;111»§ 113/531 §§MMM§§ Z`l"l',"§é.)`e hom/51 t 50 605§§11`§1§§5)'@1)§§'€§1§§1§§ 1551§~111§51; @05551>§5'/ §§,1:1§,1)§§.§1>§\1§;§1>.§"’\1'§§1§ O`§' CC¢§§. §‘@1'5‘;§ 15§11§§§% ©.§ §m§§§g§§w 00§<>,§;§1,11,1’1'. 5§§/»15§@, m§`§§qu§\"§v§z, §M;§U(: ` d §§§m\. Co§§w»sa§ M@m,ku§mw /§\.§1§ §§»a lw§§v\=§§-r§vw.§§g} §§L§USQJ §c§ 915ng §§0§11':'. m 6§\\§€£@5§`§\1115§ w§gc§§o §§1§§ §@5011,°§3§1§\1§§ ww§§ §§ §or§`mg §§dp@§”<$‘.@, §§1\'1§1 §§c.§ . §G\'W§§@ Q.Y)p§§§ §\§.v§ §\€§§ sq§‘&w

EEA/>

In }MMM/mnfm, am wis,se§,qL Lz&\ 23' zmzi\a@>§ m.w‘za§, m cm GJM'.- §M¢qcm\sed \noj wm aimed fm ogw%m/§§g +a §\)'UH maj (3@\*\ ¥»"\15"\\\'§1§5 w§c JCML.C§R‘L`M 0 § . WWRY\¥ Amvrj MM'¢,- A'»S B{zu.vlce e§cofJ?/)-$-€\ mm fw£»§§ech‘ \N W¢.cm)§~e @-{5~ %\/\ WAVQHM mfg

K.QSQWMHM am gm M §R{MMLM_ as gmc WQN\L§ COQMFs'\/\w\j mm éd€‘»l g {W§Vrc; §1§%,§6§ 'M~ +u\)m§u»j jeei§&§; `g vacuum §UZL '§\¢LC'W §\L- bmw/55 §edm\\/m\,,.@agcm pm umw e§q §ou\!§b` iwmmw)~dq§aw.u)h¢¢"€ ¥MCSWN W\v@\\l'€d W\~s pa 9 \MZA Meg§v>-('{W`L@S §@J.§M\\QM §QN \§jr£gojidw G§W’»§.\ dam ajer V\o§ ¢LW ng im 3€`£§'\\ LW~ emi mem/§ claim o§m§HCH-v~e a.<.s;€§wyac& 0§ COUV‘S@\ U\'WO"`\ wm §O“Wj€fj WW`€ j‘§ O`“‘§“C ‘W“’ q)@lcm'§ fepfj¢§@/\jm§écvz cuN/¢ res pac§ §0 c\j§w¢§\,¢ hww)mm§\‘s§\i a .» T\/)c v\";$\!h"'§ jas e§§ec§€m @_<,gggwy,@ og-Cows¢ §§ vw§ Cz>\\£{w\&j Jcr)jw"¢`o& ,\0\8 § €MQW)S a\§¢lr‘o "\'\¢w§§€`§ § CLW<’/°j 05 GAC""WW ’ 4

nch w\\m Numjw\m? mmjcv%a_g ~l¢\/m-¥ 4\/.@§§0&<1.§¢@ M m'§ k 6 §Cavw 'H in Haa'i‘¥ll§$ M"\Ww§ as§ §§ch e§

C.( \~N\MX ()Q…UWIH N\UW§ 'Wm<'§ 64a-m vw\d€co;§§m¢j %\»z{wr‘qL/¢Hu e.§&>..z:§€u\c.a.ss'%§mi.e _ o § coovm\ §Wm@§\ §ed am W<) mg wapa g mw\m;d' mm cwwl,§' gmi vw.ax'§j mm '\`§ §m\u ~m \\ ¥Y\¢)L\L 2 C\ Hm§gj r~a.Qu€S§ §0% 3<\/»4 CXC\USL\`)OV\ @'G~§L\ngcj_fg sc\`.`z@(j mow/lpg c§\/,\;CM §§ las pim\'\y \L\Wv.> Ka. maj @§\~1':»1 jim mg § W\s»:u§%.‘w 'i\m§mwm} gm "@Qmm§; em,§\»m..gw iqu ev M»w#;ew;a 0 §'§\/\,z/.\ j@§w\d’c.wq"§»

:\v\ je:§es\ w w 6 415 a>\/w»¥\/m\c WMM ¢)u`§ H,m§\a mg€dj §oac.lce,\:?vy\ M§w MML`\ jamxdm`§ \\£)5 \'Mv\ rjdv\'\la.j Ws S`i).c\\/\ Mw'\€jw\

_ _ Wa£m\duc§o§

' €\J\‘é)wa.@e Mle M\l\*@§ajc¢t\.m_.o§ j§\/zc Mth ‘kw)mjm))u\~€ § Cow$`§%‘§o‘§€wud@ je'&`e@m»j§ \))MW jrva ‘»"BXj`M/'M\mj fhwa H pz§wj~aw§ §v\§@sw»ngul{§§g@§ \l\/L§OM(“§>\ SMLM amj$ei`z\)\fa.,_ml? am Uvdcm€a)l ams-§ `~§¢g@\ couv»se\ c\:\e ses v\c>'§§@ §\\c,,a €\lc)%x‘.

hqu "_ 44 ivwevtcw . R:l\so\s§'Paa@am`nwmwwm- j “ j `“`°L QWU'\`W j COUWSU v-a.€aj;o)l;jwaaj §a,$j`amaw@ jo 509 gm 'Wa €uj,s'a ew‘a`:jer/a£a,\xexav\a C»a>a‘ a wl :\a/\ "\ \_j;~\zj:' OT' §§ § jamva av\a)v\a.aj,'l co'\`\\ \a)a §aeaj cwa aim 6a aaM'/laLX\/av\_ W-ajwiaj WLL<.-€~ Q,dw,,\ 'a:'_>§-jja I>_.j.'S. "Lj`rn~ka’a\ 1 ve §qu ‘a¥ healme 'lo.wa'a\a/\`ca tjoij \'Y\av\ajoa,a:'. jB"<\/mjcaj%j? Iv§ PM 150 da'jz`fj`?>j 267, T\wcoaa §§oav\j <§\/aca§ aj)j;a?ljauajs" had manual was jij C_Q%=Hjj a \oLj §'a.‘\ 111\;¢\.3 w a\a:aa§h§aja m €`vajcwa€`aw \;e'%amj'aal wvjvaas.;'a€ des\)a¥a_{ja a @avaj\ajoaj\ikj maj rail § majv\a,ss as §§a;aaaaj 0"§* la'jjj>a./\a\wj'§ arc \¢\'j§`\)a;j €vi‘avaj; maj co~wa)a"\§av~§ §o §ag'§;- §§ ma L'\'\"s \z>@\wj(i-» Wa, §avakaaaaaaaj eha;j.a @ C--mj amaagjaajja;g o § Wa j>@a §@ax§:-a)¢\ Qoa\‘»§imva§ iz*v\aa,j“\wm,a ada aj\/»jc\a §oa' wamgj MavjaI/v‘rs' jb\v»a,ana€j iw\/Paa!jm/aj - seamans a>§ ‘§\a<: avajaaa jroa.eejjaaj cm-ba jaa{*`j;)-amaj la Mamjaimsa,'Tvm\ cwj.>a\ j §'q:\ Laj 05 yazzvva"‘@@j ~§o ms _a`\;:aaj? 3m §a\aaa\ao&aaw€v ajqp~eaj, i&waasj`caaua§aj %e,(~`aj@ajjj,j aa§'¥a,a‘ 'I(\/»awv\m`a;'& 661/w "Waca\ CO\N\$Q\ d§oWOWj V'\‘L`\,'ha\i€j;;“l\’€\ web j'\’*§&¥’?mj ‘ jimmy maj mm mar 1a No\zme ava"oam: R" wm ama§o£€a;wm\ jjjaa\§

THE CUU§LY‘. T\M.s is, Maa \aasa.jovam cav' `L‘\~apjdam §m M\W o§'~ \aaaia>aal§ wfj>~as M‘cma\?cjc€é aba aj\jade<.\aj\avaa €w\ma, leo mpavaja\‘@® a~gs.,X¥ saga, h\\ mas»a\l§

Nij lSE‘. an £_\\\mmjo is q>ae\jcs§ mcmaa;la;\'am?ajj Muj\aa wa.srj€'law Lv)e§('ea+jw\o, class Us'¥w/aaaj

\zww_’>a,'jv`\`& aj@!%yaw»@aa\\e§j@§/\Mj ¥r)\j \/\`\vM “\j/»aj'\\aw

ama §a\a l<\naa'j¢;zaa\(£‘v~‘\ 13,£%»2'5) jij on\aj issv a I\/mjja&s was jam-§ lmra was zapaasej iv

\>a aj\w‘@"n\q w`c"chiva 610 jcaaj-§ @§~j§/aa '6 rdad' 1310 adm Cau‘a."§o§' C\~a`r¢aa§`awa§ U\p(acaj§ , umw W€"j iam aj “\’\4&5 meal co\j\,c\,a was ju.wuaaa§j Wa '\`5"“4 ,'WMO jmaj§ awaan aajo <

THECOU*K F'. franam\>a' `Geaaec\;`\aj j {?\Aa je§ev»jcav\?§ma>av‘a ja)waj ama 'jaaa//aigd?ealj ¢

MR.`w \s¥z‘. X \aaj s@mj a§aa&a.` Mja:ja>a ,§3@+ mama ajdazs_aes gm ifssaa jafka appaaj j liab ajj¢'as@a; §\/aa. is€c{a, 1041 ama §aa_a.§\lva mama/aa eaja jeaa`:a;\b\a\a mac-jay ma\aw¥aa:j£aaam aw§ \'La ado/§ agaiij §6 §\\0. j Vat.fLWa,/M I’§\/\a\ra §§ Vla) 'VLa`j§`?C-ae O-C'Yappaca\ow@a la @KQW,B'E§)J

- 2 4

umwa eeaaaaa\'t\aa wmata '

C<>W@\ Cm\ej h <‘MAUC+ maj mwauj €u\_ paa£aaa\ ja?§aoaaanjjq)e;&a¥jwaaaj was jajn~ju~aj 0£'~ e¥@aa.*v‘\`\ja€~a\m§aw¥x`w"j/)j5 7‘¥ F SMj‘V/‘,éaj'BO'L..BOL P@¥`\&waaa §waj |a\)`aavj \>¢`ajvdaaaj bajj,jjg fa+ja>aa;aj)’s €\/\aa>\jvaj>@rmaa iva c"j\\ skaggs , \)a)¥~¥m mos¥`wvjjor\msv\jj 90 hls\/amaw¥;

Pe)c“\¥§ov»e)f Wsjew\os\w'quaj jzrajujjce le\)a\c&\/\ovq\n "c¥£`s ?ejr§¥ioow.'ssj)acd \a' 'Hovl jf\/m\~ CWJU,CXQ fs oilfv\ass€$ ha W¢?va`q ¢c\;`cow UOOU \NML {M:ac{~

wea§ow#w. a _¥RE.§Q_MC;E ` `

AE»%;F_A.%‘:a va\weaj; Ha c\/\Qsaj iva¥a\a‘\vmjl\j(:,aw& alco comming am majaoagqmsjwa/,"\\)o SQ)¢§~'%@v‘€i€¢lw)a evr@v’$,€a\'jc\/m~§ N`\)jm `L€ ja novo {Q&\Ac,jevajal £g a based ¥wqqu)\te'( o GCov\slc`jo¥\`o./Lcd haw C>avacmll‘j L®oa¥s‘rav£em lc\a¢jam\al 0 § '\€\'®\S sepoawje €fom {'\¢avmv\"l'g oeth QLJchvj:

35 ' “

REASGN$ Foi< @K¢‘\NT\NC THE w fur

UVW&\)\‘

de Lev\()ayv¥§ Ct@(§{`ki'k¥§ bad ¥\Mz mag o Q\\O Pl\\HO £\)//m ‘\LE'\?@ESWTM\ON /

S"rc'o\/\ 3§3 WOVCGV\C€NV\ f)@("@\/Ldaw€\é\/wade(/’ €0\ \mr\\/c€vlvm§sb\oo¥ MLMg m.»

ques¥e<§ €covv\ de GCdem/V\‘ wilv\w\y\ ¥\ZHMY 09 qp fo 6&6$§01/1@\ 591 a)M Wd*(a d § lect'{

s@\§_ »s ewiv\g asce(&cd

Jru"c\`-Ww@v L,JN_{LS_LS_‘EQ_¢J@;¢% 7 §u 23 BSZCApp .[HVN] L‘<‘CB)» `\’@< &\A%s wasch

jc\/\£s CQ§ ¥§vm£ 3\490\5 M`CVMW-o \09 j€\\,%5 &\o»wm§)[f 31me CpurH'\/le\»c€wjrew§f

0€-'_§5 S'¥\\`gv § ' ' Rm\sowwf.; »_ ,u , , md . .\

A»f)e€cv\dem/‘r\ms a cove§jr§\ co MSe/\ovLaM MI'Hi@'»t.j<€@ md cum mo n). cmé cuva Q>¥M@[’FC~ 513 11 3@\(*,~' mil/\MMUM 0€ khe €%LL§§ im ll§(j'\,¢& C~'Y&CQR). '\N;LL,‘MS vgl§g'~ lg,/ 52.?£4§,562(2<11))3 w )»M R"W@\\:¢\a coov»%\ u msuccess Fd Ux¢ 'wnde,W; ova c\q%ms¢w/O mi§ed hug our mW¢oi, CW) VLO¥Q$X [vl€ofbv\m) !\¥wc¢ mj @i<,w,cswc\eil(wm/¢§ Wm\\de€iciey\,fam) pmdvd¢`d`rc(

T\'w 53me Coml\¥\/\m, AW mgum)ole \oo,¥weew{rv@ ]W yes 0 €Clm?ms`wo\hvéwg dewm\ 0€<1;§1§{211/»¢@ 0 @qppeLWre Co<)vc§f/£¢ §MS¥,;W/ `NQWS HWFCOUN\

_ €q\\e<) Jro a§sd¢\“ 04 (`1!\'\3 %f\\@,¢ qpa{¥\‘~cu\cu C'\cu”w\, A&>aqus' §¢{@o{wlance was WoJFl/`\“;_ MCC€€M} ana WQOJ€C{& L&MmL/_O_lzLD/IQB U,.§. 7§;_. CJ\/M¢ {’\/Lc Covn)()hl§v¢€€) 0 (; ZQ /

KEASG&\‘$ FcK eillm'¥\wé'w§ wm p@(€mmm cows%§¥u‘re acowpl¢&mc&uc¢\ 01 cov¢§&vu@%cve dam amc Qs§'ss¥auce oCr coo»sa\= Ysedud€w "\s view MQ¢) » W"’L “"h"""w ["°\G R““'TED:/€“ W€€@'GH W" W°“~ REAsoM#H:.-, A, LEH¢\H\M PERFoRMaN;L, A-\>p@,\m@ cooms@\ '€aél@`() _\Lc),(€x\;¥o(m\\>i mimhc,c§§uw§'vo\`() sm&mce on apprkW Se(`w/€@) Mo CO\MPWW{'J/no~/ SLJOVV\ Q/€Ct'~~ dowvh\pcess bv}jcha!g€e§“&vg“?u£%ca’éf mc@_§ we ane§¥a)maw/{' iMl/ce.ve.&/r)"§) Dw\<»w€u\ Amsz kac¢\¥i£dg)'§?/g, flrwa m/MS fw cus‘rcc)y cw& vw mc)£<;"mn+o¢ 0anth gme,v\/Am),@> le)ch)/v\' \/m‘¢) €o\r éc\ag,@) `m c)€$c Lose%m ' §q@¥o§&w\%s$ c~,)\‘fu£\n<]/{o jresh@ owwuj\oe\/M@;‘(:c() /l\`M) imc-cd Ceuwse\§ fideng C vecov§‘: TMQCMQ fmc append ms §>QSQJ ev» cm umwmaja[a dewmvw%omo@¥h.ehue' @a¢ks,@w) dam ae\c) cumude eu\‘\¢)w/u»e €`Me reva ; "`L&QMQ wo,aoo@,»c;zs-;sm'o¢z compp¢wllms demsz e €Ce.c+dve ass ss{zwcc o § Coumse \¢am) Q)\wuu iw+h/‘s

REAsoN$ 'Fo'& 6 2d NT\N€THE wm ~"vo oc)\»¢.§cw\i\>`\\zi§,c@s@ wo,aoo%--Q ras~zeq-o‘) micm<) amd dismiss@J/Oq 're}maé/ )r@ Qns<)~\% Jchmcc\mcy 0§ 'lc\/u», Vw§k 1ch/Lc` HH S`gs¥@mpc~ _jus‘jo"ce, im Jchc €M.jm!es+oc;jv\!\)¢,`_jos¥f~ce im O\cvifv-c+\/\M l did ha § 60 Wwv\'§'$lc l,€&§ l 56 l can glove pa please»§fcwbj& we av§€)()po<{uv\}{`§ /{'o plva ‘Jf R;A§@Mu.rz,» mr wm Li'€£§&@&mm+i' Wmm\o(\e<:a$ovmm Cou(% XQM ewqu \I%€U\oacwsq iv\\:es\(€‘»ga{v/ \!»\\a\¢tea\ `\ij% vm,az\gcwwou \r) dam irc \/\o(¥ ma `lv: rejm\m"rio m:@w~e way he umw M(y wes}€dm) because law A»sclos£vg qlljc\¢¢WLz abdu{'|/m illega\ q<;h"w`\`\’eg aga'\`us+ma,.,, Am§ I cwqu .§L(», \>@c`\ea§ hume amy'M%\ag \oa£) \/`\;¢Wms'jc@ wm m vng €avnilg,+\/Lq‘rwi\\ h amy §§ M¢, \!Lllm\zml§ fei¢x\£a+{um, \oeca\)'z@ 093:\4@ aamwa\j Jq\@ d‘\/)a smi"\ld§ pmp[@iwh,‘s Cowzpifa€y § Co\\oco m,\/wa>s me w rob w\@,Y/w,wo<)\b Aqf_c¥o §Qw<§ _i(n§ _£@opl€ jre \»M mm Kw'g ('va»f\§,~a$ \'?el§€owwvi\'H€<\ pagva haw uv)c/_u OW?:LEL%W\§ 1510 Cé,» YL_¢ W\G{C" _"rc) W I+ we m even \&il\ me €m Jc\»\c ¥vo§r\},w€:`&a; ' y ::\RFL£Y@§<){;;¢; f {£~y§%%:;e?)mwéwm some 56,+°&1);0+@¢&\614 Fo{ maj of mm) WKJ W` ly/ Iax)¢)l<) quv'ecidjfe §JY Iuvde¢s{mv\l} i‘*l\*`e$\t\"{"»\ "\3 cov»\twj oo¥+o"m liq\/é( as l gomiseh Y\»` M a)\¢\cvc Uv'tlaa)€u\lg Mes\Lcc} m@ OM`*QH [’l,ZOO`l‘(. I 323 explained v{'o ‘Hw mo Wm) counzc\,\oo+ Vu; re@\)se@ 40 iv\£o rm jud¢d <>, oc Amc\o;c,‘c\m (}cc+ mid/1a vem~d,, 1 ccwu;\o)fspm,¢w) 156 MKVQ&K €wcd\CS\/\ a)( jc\/\€ jr§me,lw&s mim\(oweé Jco

9mm Fe\ww\wnwewwr<\‘v in (`U wonle le cw$we{ llw$lcvle§ queslwms q`!l[‘llm‘v' Co'nuwuleozcc bg lms/from \\#M,CLHQ SVM,COUH, lam been @mneo£ Wease closomeflll§o{bmcem. §gudyml€o%‘ca/)o'€~lm,);:/, l cwa ld @'W/e/cz‘eccu£@ I JM'f hoyt many 40 pay 01 gooi@ffo/ng lode/dew m;lu$ 1991 WMHO»/lomlle$u _ ~ me Cou‘n§» Thwi)z gov my /vu)cl/z !b¢gw/ €e£lew?,m/, {»¢ vl' la )`5 Wlalll@$’:’§w e{}¢lll/HJ i`\n FUYWMIFUM if ‘l¥ ued , .` P`RM 12 z wl\\=,\l£¥or<\=_,?m:msc;s comswmzb,‘l josé A`\>)M)o,. Plll\‘{"€o( se\lQ.-lyjudgimg no c)wz,4 b@CC\aJse is loc “lM€ llm\ofi\>l»$oprevv\€ COOl l~ le c\eclc) 1 a)\/\ollcbo\u carol/gi v’v\ colling 333 ' Qm\)a v\qy lhwca/we any llvn£..Tl/w,.$lal¢ fowth lwaliesyowseloappllcqllvu ll.OY?ose&g¢,APH& l*vu\lv vwc.> 15 ‘lv laij §M valve l7 fl\e§n\fS\/Lmlr l\wj am keep mammade §o! wme €1;: s}x‘lwvv wm&\:$@lm\;l\s 9001"`\0 pivvlovv/"§ 15 l\/»is llovmm\ol@§oprevm G)uvlqomg 40 lel ~l\¢Rg`\lqoslmq)mss ivqucl’aml clc no‘l’l/vl'vxg? farm llle§&ll§¢l@pnl\/a<) oF-llle,sewq~ mlecl (»ww\ mi lovely €<`umlly 153 lorcq,m’§?lvw\@¢wg( QW) m WW €¢u~u\,j gm mloc€ou$l<'j and l-vxleml\“o vullg 365%@9 QJ.- 1 pl&;hlllls laggll~lo gwéllllyvl\%§@ \oack wll\¢ mg cable cmc) llnw/e 600 h;lgcs_. lin/all ceases/5 sal §ox¥\Al\¢¢@re\/llll\ecl m¢€ol v'elo=o,lwclla llu 3m ul\,,fLladllll\l\)\{j@n€gl/lb%€:l:lj§)ophr)o./;'v\cee%<) ll;' "'lmomg ld\ Covwlc‘lla v{';."`l nalleclm assislam 0 6 Cwnse l"c< ml §lea plicqllom o(é§lale(l wle_SO Fle log+llc§~lqle/avw) diem/liss chordef l;wvx‘w‘é +v, Dvs"cw<,+ Cou'\l~ Uel>l) G)ovllg T¢w, wl `m mdesewecl acquillul/

REA€GN§ FOPGW\NUNGTHEWR\T DQ.poAWv€fo(`- Cx€w\im\ jug¥l c@ Gm `wwvl<€rm\e,as gade ice \)Ues{o‘rec) k o¢i'giml shin/s o HQ \e,ascz \o@@oc<»;¥\»»c owc~a`w q>so€ew\\*ow wm Jw‘¢\ 6 9 Ga\ée am) i 1139le c\/Lcwge Cas¢ 100c 2009~(,1@€~63‘1"04¢, l (~mal£j play '1Lz) H\i`§ Hommbfe§wpreme O»WH (`rqypr/l`¢l+€/ "C)mil" 4\/L4jr`l,'§osé Muv@ \AMIFO(~CQ\A\`MME/ 1 w csuiovw\`“e§ a Cow\\>te{ve S‘hdovmw\', mm Ql\ Jc\/xc, \v\€rw MA(§OVL Sc+ wolf a\oo\)~e. §§ 3m L‘¥o'¥\/w \@e$jro(‘ way mel€o'g ‘e',- 909~ I&\so reques¥]<\/\ls Hovv>m&\z$\>pcem (Qo 1¥)(0 umwa ami imgokuv‘cw passt la in \i@`\/\‘ro¢‘¥ho (udc{bo,cm)€c "¥W "CERUO@ML\,'¢»)

é Tl)cm# 1565/w Rawsej 0¢1@, Llw)';" [/00 FN¢G$§ W

R@swzow,?je.v“/§S;

V\chc) `wx desk NQ`\\ \00)(&¥\£) €X€CO+Q<) Om+\ais 4\/\¢3“‘3613 0¢`\0[`¢/ QOIS'

‘/'O

CONCLUS|ON

The petition for a Writ Of certiorari Should be granted

Respectfully submitted,

1 w Mrr\ Dat@. M@fh gm _

Lll

SUPRE|\/|E COURT OF THE UN|TED STATES

;Yosé ALvAr

_(Your Name)

_ PET|T|ONER

vs. THESIAXEO`PTEXAS¢,.’¢'>,¥ a\l'f ` '_ REsPoNDENT

PROOF OF SERV|CE

IJOSC /`\\V'@\`T'LJO Z , do swear or declare that on this date,

:B#h ,20 115 , as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the enclosed MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI on each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and With first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery Within 3 calendar days.

The names and addresses of those served are as follows: /..Th UNR°W A;d Amij

One Copu of ilu`s liln‘i oF Ce/il»'omij ms ser ueo:"/o/ The Opvasfvgfdmfillhlau_e{'

`297Il 111 %h1 1/15 Mq1/l;1sv+h1samdak“c)/ewv‘m/andsmmr.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXecuted on M!,U ]8#',/ l 1 120-15 . '.

V ( (Signature)

ll\l THE SUVRE\“L\Z CClU‘W\T ClF THE Ul\l\TED STAT'ES TR\M Ch$¥ NO~ ROOS 'CKS “SS‘l' D‘l

IGS¥; N.\li\\il\%,l’e]tii'[oue( FMSC1

\13.v m sure 01 T\axis,"¢l 01\\".

"Mcm§ `0\\\)\'-,\< 101 wu 1\\1\)11\\1 umm\oi)"

"Ap‘)evi'd`\x I\"./ .

9 '(:Aim\ im N)lmn}e§ 511‘991'99 591<1@11&0@11101

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ _ ` SOUTHERN DISTRICT ()F TEXAS N WL\E) 9 LAREDO DIVISION

JOsE ALVARADO ZAMARRIPA W§i/ Lodl/li\\fc Cle\l k

…" _ … “ ““"§” 0“\1‘"“i@/1 §¥§lt&@l

Petltioner, VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5: 12- CV- 155

§ WlLLlAM sTEPHENs, ' § W@ BOX O`Ci La/eoqe xix §l 7ao#o

Respondent. FINAL JUDGME_NT

For the reasons set forth in a`l\/Iemorandum & Order of even date, Respondent William Stephens motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 28) is GRANTED and Petitioner JOSE ALVARADO ZAMARRIPA’ s “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody” (Dkt. l) is DENIED Accord_ingly, this case is hereby DISMI§§ED vvith PREJUDICE

Because the Court concludes that Petitioner makes no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability Will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(0)(2). For this reason, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal from this decision would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, should not be taken informal pauperis See F.ed. R. App. P. 24(a). l

ThelCl_erk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Final Judgment to Petitioner via certified mail, return receipt-requested The clerk is further DIRECTED to terminate this case,l

This ls a FINAL JUDGMENT. l

SIGNL`D this 18th day of August, 2014

<§i§j&&{:;

TRUE COPY l CERTI _ Diana Saldana AT'.l EST: FY United States District Judge

DAVIDJ. B DLEY, lcrk ofC'ourt `\ ' B ()//\/1§'(; 'r . /, /4_§/ 'r" o l / ly umw merk GOOd CMJ§Q §€mft\l/\§ made Qty;,ei)* x M’l;vnv> .§*ta_tc/’ 'W? 5"&)"-> 2d 295 29

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

JOSE ALVARADO ZAMARRIPA, Petitioner,' VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-155

WIL~LIAM STEPHENS,

COOWJCMCMCOOWJC‘ODWJ

Respondent. MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Petitioner J_OSE ALVARADO ZAMARRIPA, a state inmate confined by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, has filed a pro se “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in lSt-ate Custody.” kat. l.) Therein, Alvarado challenges his state conviction for indecency with a child by sexual contact on four grounds (Id. at 2, 6~7.) Pending is Respondent William Stephens’ motion for summary judgment (Dl

The Report is based in part on the following Alvarado failed to challenge his arrest at trial or his detention on appeal. (]cz’. at S~ll.) Alvarado did not raise his sufficiency of the evidence claim in his final direct appeal, and such a claim is not cognizable under TeXas habeas review. (]d. at 13.) Alvarado’s counsel was not constitutionally deficient, counsel’s failure lto appeal was moot, and the claim that counselfailed to call Alvarado’s wife as awitness was not raised on appeal. (Id. at l6-l7.) Moreover, Alvarado did not provide any new evidence to

support his claim of actual innocence in order to overcome his-procedural default (Ia’. at 18.)

l/8

Alvarado filed objections to the Report (Dkt. '36), which the Court has considered Alvarado’s objections include that he was arrested without a warrant and detained for l6 months without being indict-ed, that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, that his trial

attorney’"s"r`epr`e"s‘e'i`it§iiib£i v`v`as"ineffe€t`i"ve,"abdjiiiai'iiéi"s“a'ciiiaiiy` iiih‘<`>cé`rii."'(`i§i`<"t'."j651 "1`- 1"§.')' ' The ' ` District Judge, having made “a de novo determination of those portions of the [R]eport or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made,” hereby ACCEPTS the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 34). -See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). Accordingly, Respondent’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 28) shall be GRANTED and Alvarado’s petition (Dkt. l) and motion for an attorney (Dkt. 33) shall be DENIED. Discussion

Each' ground for relief is discussed below.

l. vD‘ep'r'ilvatio'n of liberty

Alvarado objects to the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that his claims challenging the legality of his arrest and detention are procedurally barred (Dkt. 34 at 8-1 l; Dl

without being indicted2 (Dkt. 36 at 1-9.) The Supreme Court has held that where a state has

l Alvarado contends that the Repoi“t and Recommendation is inaccurate because he was not ari ested by lmmigration and Naturalization Services. (Dkt. 36 at 5. ) However, the Report only states that Alvarado was placed on an immigration hold by INS (Dkt. 34 at 8), which

1 Alvaiado agrees with in his objections (Dkt. 36 at 5).

2Alvarado now for the first time alleges that his indictment was void (Dkt 36 at l .) Federal courts will not consider claims that a state indictment is insufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the trial court when the issue was squarely presented to the highest court of the state and that court passed on the merits of the sufficiency issue. Alexana’er v. McCotter, 775 F.2d 595, 598-99 (5th Cir. 1985). When the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refuses to grant a petitioner’s request for relief, it essentially holds that fexas courts have jurisdiction and the indictment is sufficient for that purpose [d. Hei'e, the l\/Iagistrate Judge found that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refused to grant Alvarado’s petition (Dkt. 34 at 4), and thus the trial 2 / 8

provided an opportunity for full and fair litigation of a Fourth Ainendment claim, a state prisoner may not be granted federal habeas relief on the ground that evidence obtained in an

unconstitutional search or seizure was introduced at trial. Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 494

(1976). The Fifth Circuit has interpreted “an opportunity for full and fair ligation”`to mean an opportunity to contest the unlawful searc and seizure, regardless of whether the defendant actually took advantage ofthat_ opportunity Jariecka v. Cockrell, 301 F.3d 316, 320-21 (5th Cir.

2002), cert denied, 537 U.S. 1196 (2003). Here, the Magistrate Judge»found that Alvarado did

_not take advantage of the opporturgy to challenge the legality of his arrest during tr§i}l. (Dkt. 34 at 9.j Thus, as Alvarado already litigated his Fourth Amendment claim in state court, it is procedurally barred.

Moreover, 28 U.S.C. §'22'54(b) requires that a habeas _petitioner exhaust available sta'te_, procedures before he pursues habeas relief in federal court. See Wz'orz v. Quarlerma)i, 567 F.3d 146, 148 (5th Cir. 2009). Here, the Magistrate Judge found that despite having appealed his conviction to the Texas Eighth Court of Appeals and filing a state habeas application with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, §_lyarado did not present his detention claim to either state cclur/t (Dkt. 34 at 9410.) Alvarado now argues that he statedin‘his habeas application “Alvarado in Custody and no Indictinent” but it was ignored. (Dkt. 36 at 8.) However, the Magistrate Judge found no such statement (Dkt. 34 at ll), and the Court finds no such statement upon its review of Alvarado’s habeas applications (see Dkt. 25, Attach. 4 at 53-63; Attach. 31 at 15-25). Therefore, as Alvarado failed to exhaust Walso procedurally barred.

Alvarado alleges that exceptions apply to his procedural default. (Dkt. 36-at 8-9.)

Specifically, Alvarado argues that there is cause for his procedural default and prejudice

court had jurisdiction ind the indictment was suf ` nt for that u o 3 / 8 LQ ' ' ~ Q

attributable thereto and that the Court’s failure to review his claims will result in a fundamental

miscarriage ofjustice (ia’.). , See Colemari v. Thornpson, 501 U.S. 722, 750 (1991). To satisfy the

“cause” standard, Alvarado must show that some objective factor external to the defense z,__

CMl/\impeded counsel s compliance with Texas procedural rules SW§ W). Alvarado has made no such showing. (See Dkt. 36 at 8-9.) Although ' vineffective,assistance of counsel can qualif as cause, McCleske S. at 494, Alvarado’s claims in that area are meritless, as discussed below. Aiid the “justice” exception is;confined to cases of actual innocence, where the,petitioner shows, asa factual matter, that he did not commit ' the crime of conviction. Fairman v. Anderson, 188 F.3d 635, 644 (5th Cir, 1999). “To establish ~ the requisite probability that he was actually innocent, the petitioner must support his allegations

with new, reliable evidence that.twas,rlot`presented at trial and mu w that it was more 111 ,_"______,____________.,r- ,____.____..___~__§I

an not that no reasonable juror would have convicted him in the light of the new evidence Id

Alvarado has not presented new and reliable evidence _(See Dl

neither exception permitting federal habeas review of Alvarado’s procedurally barred claims

applies, Respondent is entitled to summary judgment on them. :/

Alvarado also objects to the Magistrate Judge"s conclusion that habeas i‘elief is not warranted for his sufficiency of the evidence claim. (Dkt. 34 at 11~13; Dl

sufficiency claim on direct appeal, he failed to assert this claim in a petition for discretionary

4/8

review. (Dkt. 34 at 12-13.) This constitutes a procedural default under Texas law that bars federal review. Clark v. Texas, 788 F.2d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 1986) (per curiam); Noriega v.

Thaler, 2011 WL 677352, at *4 (SD. Tex Feb.16,2011).

Furthermore, a sufficiency of the evidence claim is not cognizable under Texas habeas

v

review. Ex parte Grigsby, 137 S.W.3d 673, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). This constitutes an

independent and adequate state procedural ground that bars federal review. Reea’ v. Thaler, 428 F. App’x 453, 454 (5th Cir. 2011) (per curiam). Also, Alvarado has not met either the “cause” or “justice” exception above permitting federal habeas review. (See Dkt. 36 at 10-11.) As such, summary judgment on this claim shall be granted.

IIl. Ineffective assistance of counsel in joe 1`\`(,1 QVA' C\llA€M/¢L/

l j d Also unpersuasi-ve{is Alvarado’s objection ito the Magistrate 1udge’s conclusion that habeas relief is not warranted for his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. '(l.)kt.' 34 at 134.-17; Dl

sthz'nglon, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 694 (1984 .

Here, the Magistrate Judge found that while Alvarado ostensibly disagrees with his

\c:)unsel’s trial strategy, counsel presented a defense that included testimony from Alvarado and a

,/--_--~_`_______\_‘______,__..J Wit to exchLde Alvarado’s written confession éDl

Strl'ckland, 466 U.S. at 689 (“[T]he defendant must overcome the presumption that, under the

circumstances,'the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy.”). Moreover,

5/8_

Alvarado does not present any evidence to demonstrate that counsel’s representation was

deficient or that the state court’s a lication .rickland was unreasonable See Day v. _¢ 1

Quarterman 566 F. 3d 527, 540- 41 (5th Cir. 2009) (“The federal habeas court must defer to the

state court’ s factual findings unless the petitioner rebuts those findings with clear and convincing .__,,../""`-___~'"_"`

evidence ») Furthermore, Alvarado’ s claim that his counsel was ineffective beca@ ,\)G Q$M

1 file . appea is moot given that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted his application to ._____f' `

file an out-of-time appeal and he subsequently filed one (Dkt. 34 at 15-17). See Roe v. Flores-

O'”f€ga» 528 U-S- 474 483-86 <2000>- AlSO, M.__.L

failed to call his wife as a witness on direct a e l or in his state habeas applicationj which barsy

federal review. (Dkt. 34 at 17 ) And, Alvarado has failed to present evidence to overcome this _______/’\_` ._.--__-_----N

pM (See D1

Also meritless is Alvarado’s objection to the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that habeas relief is warranted for his claim of actual innocence. (Dkt. 34 at 17-18; Dkt. 36 at 10, 14-15.) The Supreme Court has held that a claim o_f_act_da_ll_irm_o_§§rlc_e,_ on its own, is not a basis for

federal habeas relief because it is not a constitutional claim. Herrem v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390,

400 (1993); see also Graves v Cockrell, 351 F. 3d 143, 151 (5th Cir. 2003). lnstead, as noted above a claim of actual innocence is a means or a “gateway through which a habeas petitioner

1 must pass to have his otherwise barred constitutional claim considered on the merits.” Herrerq,

506 U.S. at 404. The standard for showing actual innocence is demanding and seldom-met See

McQL/z'ggz`n v. Perkins, 133 S. Ct. 1924, 1928 (2013). In order to establish actual innocence, a '

petitioner must demonstrate that it was more likely than not that in light of new and rglgl_ble/

673'

£\icie11ce, “no juror, acting reasonably, would have voted to find him guilty beyond a reasonable

doubt.” _Id.

»_~/_`

Here, as a free-standing actual innocence claim is` not a basis for federal habeas relief, the

Magistrate Judge considered the claim as a means to overcome the procedural default of,_` . _ w________,_,,,_______.

Alvarado’s other habeas claims. (Dkt. 34 at 18.) However, as noted above, this argument does

not succeed either. The Magistrate Judge found that while W,

\

such as an affidavit, nor does he present any other new evidence to support his claim of

,-`~.~y-/"""--`

innocence (Id.) Moreover, Alvarado’s objections that he did not commit the offense are also conclusory (See Dl

The 1\/[agistratel Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 34) is hereby ACCEPTED. Respondent’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. -28) is hereby GRANTED and Alvarado’s petition (Dkt. 1) and motion for an attorney (Dkt. 33) are hereby DENIED.3

The Clerl<' of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to Petitioner Alvarado via certified mail, return receipt requested Also, the Clerl< is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Attorney General of the State of Texas on behalf of Respondent William Stephens,

Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Criminal lnstitutions Division.

3 Ther_e is no constitutional right to counsel in federal habeas proceedings Elz`zalde v. D)”et/ce, 362 F.3d 323, 329 (5th Cir. 2004). Rule 6(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases provides that a court may appoint counsel if discovery is ordered and there are issues necessitating the assignment of counsel. Here, there are no discovery issues necessitating the assignment of counsel. Moreover, Rule 8(c) requires that counsel be appointed if a habeas petition raises issues that mandate an evidentiary hearing 111 the instant case, there are no issues requiring an evidentiary hearing. l '

7 / 8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 18th day ofAugust, 2014.

Diana Saldafia _ _ United States District Judge

race coast 1 cER'riFY ATTEST=

DAV 1119 LB:'*’],l)\I)LEY§ Clcrlgof Court

E] gu b *~ 1». 1, -' _Uepu’ty C=erl-_

8/8

lmth St)PRtME cannot 1115 1)1\1111\> sims

`1`1{\1\1(,113€ 110.9008-€1'€5»58‘1"1>‘1

3`0$@ 111\111111\00¢?€11#011@»'-})/0 se \1 S 1

THE sims 05 rods ";;;1 all‘

.//\‘

" spirit 1111 count itcisiou rouvt<;nou"

"/\PPENW 80

5 .p

,wf».-; ~ 1»;',1

J U D.I C I A L

ENTRY/FILING DATE ' ARREST NUMBER

ARRAIGNMENT JUDGE COMPLAINANT FILING AGENCY ADMIN. TERM. CODE

COURT DATE

4/06/2010 8

:30

~Na)ar;§occf l 911 115

TIME HEARING TYPE

48 Status'

f 3 ` (92'1"6"`5200 a)m$t dr 141 \1\1\`§¢1>1€ wh er 10 " 2058

O.J.Hale

LAREDO POLICE

LAREDO POLICE DEPARTMENT IND. TERM. CODE

ASSIGNMENT DATE

STATUS DATE

3/09/2010

STATUS

ACTIVITY DATE ACTIVITY TYPE DESCRIPTION.

9/10/2008

File Paprs *IMG* INDICTMENT FILED. DEFT IS IN CUSTODY.

w E B B c o U N T Y s Y s T-E M DoCKET Webb County Courts PAGE DATE 4/06/10 MC0250 TIME 11. 31 16 PDLM cAsE NUMBER , 2008CR5000589 D4 PLAINTIFF STATE oF TEXAS,,, ADDRESS n ~ PROSECUTING ATTORNEY: THoMSoN,PAUL,E, 4 PHoNE NUMBER: 956-726-40¢ ADDRESS . . ; 7128 RossoN LANE SUITE 5 LAREDo TX 78041 vs. DEFENDANT NAME zAMARRIPA-ALVARADO,JOSE,, S.s.# . XXX-XX-XXXX D.o.B. 12/12/1970 ADDRESS 502 GoNZALEz cT LAREDO Tx 78040 DRIVERS LICENSE # 10290520 Tx cAsE sTATUS Disposed STATUS DATE 9/10/2008 cASE DIsPosITIoN convicted DISPosITIoN DATE 1/28/2009 ALIAS ALVARADo,JosE,, 1 ALIAS ALVARADo-zAMARRIPA,JosE,, ALIAS ZAMARRIPA,JOSE,, DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GALLEGOS,ARTURO,, PHONE NUMBER= 956-727-281 _ADDRESS 1814 vIcToRIA sTREET LAREDo ' Tx 78040 coURT APPoINTED No ATToRNEY PRESENT" oFFENSE INDECENCY wITH A CHILD sEXUAL coNTACT 0011D COUNT; oFFENsE DATE oFFENSE # seoloooljwwxgbk.da+a JUDGE . o.J.Hale COURT RooM 406TH NEXT coURT DATE 4/06/2010 COURT TIME 8=30 HEARING TYPE . . Staeus PLEA . .Ndf. ouilty ATTEMPT oR coMMIT= DIsPosITIoN convicted DISPosITIoN DATE 1/28/2009

1111 1 ,, 11 407 1111 11111;1:;1:1£\1;1::1"14

mims sight 1 1

W E B B C O U N T Y J U D I C I A L S Y S T E M

DOCKET v Webb County Courts ` PAGE DATE 4/06/10 ` MC0250 TIME 11:31:16 ` PDLM CASE NUMBER . . . . : 2008CRSOOOSS9 D4

OFFCR J. GONZALEZ, SGT RENE VENEGAS, OFFCR ADAN HERNANDEZ, OFFCR CESAR BENAVIDEZ, DET CARLOS VILLARREAL, YURIDIANA ARANDA, SGT.

" “"“‘""“'""ME;;ANIE'“'vEI;ARDET”NOT“L'I'STED”‘BUT““I'S'SUED"ON"SABRINA““SANCH'E Z‘“‘('“S'U'B"P©EN“AS"“”" '“ " "

PREPARED BY DA'S OFFICE) CSV

1/22/2009 Notes CASE CALLED. JUDGE OSCAR J. HALE, JR. PRESIDING DEBBIE CAMERON, CR. PAUL THOMSON, PRESENT/ST. ARTURO GALLEGOS, PRESENT/ATTY DEF. PRESENT/JAIL. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED. CASE WAS RESET FOR MTNS ON 1/27/09 @ 9: 00 A. M. JJI

File Paprs '

APPLICATION FOR SUBPOENA OF WITNESSES FILED. SUBPOENA ISSUED AS TO “CJ" AND VERONICA ALVARADO. JJI ORDER/MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (SIGNED) JJI

1/23/2009 File Paprs 1413w31@$¢’ 4 SUBPOENA ExEcUTED 0N vERoNIcA ALVARADO & "cJ"-DOS= 1/22/09 csv STATE sUBpoENAS ISSUED 0N 0FFCR. J. GONZALEZ, DET cARLoS vILLARREAL; & YURIDIANA ARANDA. cSv 0EFEN0ANT'S ELECTION As 10 PUNISHMENT, M0110N FOR NOTICE AND wRITTEN sUMMARY 0Fr§§ARSAx`SIAIEMENI AND MOTION FOR HEARING PURSUANT 10 ARTICLE 38.072, MOTION 10 sUPPRESS, MOTION FOR DEFENDANT 10 APPEAR IN PERSONAL cLoTHING AND wITHoUT RESTRAINTS FILED. csv

1/27/2009 File Paprs SUBPOENAS EXECUTED ON DET CARLOS VILLARREAL; YURIDIANA ARANDA AND OFFCR J. GONZALEZ (DOS: 1/26/09) CSV Notes CASE CALLED. JUDGE OSCAR HALE PRESIDING. DEBBIE CAMERON CRT REPORTER. PAUL THOMSON PRESENT FOR STATE. ARTURO GALLEGOS PRESENT WITH DEFT & IN CUSTODY. WITNESSES SWORN IN & TESTIFIED. COURT HEARING TESTIMONY & ARGUMENTS DENIED MOTION TO SUPPRESS. DEFT WAIVED HIS RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL. ORDER SIGNED IN OPEN COURT. MR. VICENTE MENDOZA CRT INTERPRETERBENCH TRIAL TO BEGIN ON 1/28/09 AT 9:00 A.M. CSV File Paprs , WAIVER OF RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL FILED. CSV *IMG* ORDER-WAIVER OF RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL (SIGNED-l/27/O9) CSV AVIT FILED. CSV

1/28/2009 F'le Paprs v *IMG* T COURT MOTION TO SUPPRESS FINDING (SIGNED-l/28/09) CSV

TRIAL COURT OUTCRY WITNESS FINDING (SIGNED-1/28/09) CSV

Notes CASE CALLED. JUDGE OSCAR HALE PRESIDING. DEBBIE CAMERON CRT REPORTER. PAUL THOMSON PRESENT FOR STATE. ARTURO GALLEGOS PRESENT WITH DEFT

§`£§/§§§IQQX;_ RJ E TE MENDOZA CRT INTERPRETER. INDICTMENT READ & DEFT PLEAD NOT GUILTY. WITNESSES SWORN IN & TESTIFIED. MOTION TO INVOKE RULE G . TATE RESTED AT ll:21 A.M. AND TO RETURN ON

l: 15 P. M. COURT RESUMED AT 1:45 P. M. DEFT SWORN IN & TESTIFIED. DEFENSE RESTS AT 2: 37 P. M. STATE & DEFENSE CLOSED AT 2: 37 P. M. CLOSINGARGUMENTS BY STATE AT 3: 06 P. M. & DEFENSE AT 3: 08 P. M. COURT HEARING TESTIMONY & ARGUMENTS FOUND DEFT GUIEIX; BRIEF ARGUMENT BY

______ ;z

d

' DOCKET v 3 Webb County Courts ' PAGE DATE 4/06/10 MCOZSO TIME ll:3l:l6 PDLM CASE NUMBER . . . . : 2008CRSOOOSSS~D4

9/12/2008 File Paprs ~ »"w~--wRTTS»TSSUEDvWeSv _ 'wab

y

9/22/2008 File Paprs

6M§r414059?§3p§

. x “ 1 wRIT 0F INDICTMENT EXECUTED (DOS= 9/17/08) Csv LQ}£|W&CWVT

10/22/2008 File PaprS

CASE CALLED. JUDGE OSCAR J. HALE, JR. PRESIDING. DEBBIE CAMERON,

CR. PAUL THOMSON, PRESENT/ST. ARTURO GALLEGOS, PRESENT/ATTY. DEFT PRESENT/JAIL. CASE WAS RESET FOR POSSIBLE PLEA 11/06/08 @ lO:OO A.M. . 11111111»

ORDER SETTING DEADLINES/APRE~TRIAL DATES AND JURY SELECTION; DISCOVERY ORDER FILED. JJI

pretrial dates and discovery order faxed to atty Oscar O. Pena.

rmm.

11/06/2008; Notes

CASE CALLEDl JUDGE OSCAR J. HALE, JR. PRESIDING. DEBBIE CAMERON,

f CR. PAUL THOMSON, PRESENT/ST. ARTURO GALLEGOS, PRESENT/ATTY. DEFT.,,'

PRESENT/JAILT CASE WAS RESET FOR 11/13/08 @ lO:OO A.M. COURT INFORMED BOTH DEFENSE AND STATE THAT HE WILL ONLY TAKE THE PLEA IF DEFENDANT £§KES A POLYGRAPH TEST. JJI r*i

File Paprs _ ORDER SETTING DEADLINES, PRE-TRIAL DATES AND JURY SELECTION; DISCOVERY ORDER FILED. JJI

12/11/2008 NOteS

CASE CALLED. JUDGE OSCAR'HALE PRESIDING. VICENTE MENDOZA CRT. REPORTER. RICK LOPEZ PRESENT FOR STATE. ARTURO GALLEGOS PRESENT WITH DEFT & IN CUSTODY. MR. ALBERT LONG CRT INTERPRETER. COURT ADVISED DEFT WITHDREW PLEA. NEW DATES GIVEN: MOTION DEADLINE-l/lO/O9, PRETRIALON 1/22/09 & JURY SELECTION ON 1/26/09 AT 8:30 A.M. CSV

File Paprs ' ' LETTER FROM JOE RUBIO DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO HON. JUDGE OSCAR HALE,

CSV

12/23/2008 File Paprs STATE'S MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF DEFENDANT'S EXPERT wITNESSES _FILED. , 1/07/2009 File Paprs

STATE'S WITNESS LIST, STATE‘S NOTICE DESIGNATING EXPERT WITNESSES, STATE NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE CHILD ABUSE VICTIM'S HEARSAY STATEMENT, STATE'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE CHILD ABUSE VICTIM'S HEARSAY STATEMENT FILED. CSV

1/14/2009 File Paprs

STATE'S AMENDED WITNESS LIST. CSV

'1/21/2009 File Paprs

STATE SUBPOENAS ISSUED ON "CJ", VERONICA ALVARADO, DORA QUIJANO,

_ DOCKET Webb County Courts PAGE DATE 4/06/10 MCOZSO TIME 11:31:16 ' ~ PDLM CASE NUMBER . . . . : 2008CR3000589 D4

STATE AT 3:17 & DEFENSE AT 3:20 P.M. COURT SENTENCED DEFT TO ll YEARS TO SERVE. CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED. $611.00 COURT COST. CSV{

Ca's‘e“~A‘s‘sgn

Court date/time: 1/28/2009 - 8:30

Reassignment of court date/time.

OffenSe: INDECENCY WITH A CHILD SEXUAL CONTACT Court Sent '

Sentence entered as ll YRS TDCJ/ID

Offense: INDECENCY WITH A CHILD SEXUAL CONTACT

For JOSE ZAMARRIPA-ALVARADO Dispositn .

Disposition entered as 310.

Disposition code 310: Convicted

FOr JOSE ZAMARRIPA-ALVARADO

Hearing Hearing Type entered as 5. Hearing Type code 5: Sentencing

OffenSe: INDECENCY WITH A CHILD SEXUAL_CONTACT

2/09/2009 . File Paprs sTATEMENT 0F FAcT FILED. csv

2/10/2009 File Paprs *IMG* JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION BY COURT; SENTENCE TO INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, TDCJ (SIGNED-Z/lO/O9) CSV RAP SHEET FILED CSV

2/11/2009 File Paprs *IMG* ORDER (INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT), SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER AND BILL OF COST. SIGNED-Z/ll/O9

350.00 ATTYS FEES. TOTAL: $971.00 (ERG)

»/’”3 /26/2009 File Paprs

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL DER FOR SETTING/ORDER FILED. JJI

3/02/2009 File Paprs *IMG* lSt AMENDED JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION BY CRT; SENTENCE TO

TUTIONAL DIVISION, TDCJ (SIGNED-2/28/09) (ERG) `M****CE IEFIED COPY MAILED TO TDCJ*** -

" 9/02/2009 \ File Paprs 11MG1 AP LIcATIoN FoR A wRIT oF HABAES coRPUs sEEKING REL;EF FRoM F;NAL F LONY coNvIcTIoN UNDER coDE 0F cRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ART. 11.07

9/04/2009 File Paprs WRIT MAILED BY CERTIFIED RETURN REQUESTED TO D.A.'S OFFICE. (ERG) Case Assgn ‘ Court date/time: 1/28/2009 8:30 Hearing Type: 5 Sentencing Status changed from Open to Held '

‘ v DOCKET »

Webb County Courts PAGE DATE 4/06/10 MC0250 TIME 11:31: 16 1 _ ` PDLM CASE NUMBER . . , . : 2008CR5000589 D4

File Paprs CKET SHEET

wj§€%§¥~*11eLERKWDELEWED~sASE»BY»MLSYAKE*x.m+ERG)

9/30 2009 0 File Paprs - COPY OF ORDE V(INMATE) MAILED TO LYNN CLARK, GENERAL COUNCIL AND DEFT.

10/06/2009 File Paprs AFFIDAVIT FILED.CSV

11/30/2009 File Paprs »e. REcoRD MAILED To cRIMINAL coURT 0F APPEALs-AUSTIN (ERG)

j ilem£ap;av. 1 1 DER FROM coURT oF APPEALS FILED.csy__J

4a File Paprs

~(SIGNED 1/26/10) CSV Case Assgn ~ Court date/time: 4/06/2010 8:30 Hearing Type: 48 Status Assignment of court date/time. Status entered as Open _ NotofHear Notice setting case for April 06, 2010 sent to_DA's and to Atty Arturo Gallegos via fax.rmm File Paprs NOTICE OF SETTING FILED. JJI

\/‘OLUME 7

this offense. And as far as what the appropriate sentence should be, I do realize that the State had offered two years

and then three years. You know, at that initial stage, the

11l

v13

15 16 l7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Court doesn't -- is not aware of all the facts. It's not until the witnesses testify and -4 you know, including yourself, in this case, and, obviously, it's a serious offense. v

` i§gwl;;;§@ni;;Kn¢w:what;ih§;bfé@éri§§1§§h@e §Y¥Ql.l.l'l<'ii:i`giril:. Andsoyou w111

v mberh@w ,o_l=d th1sz.'jpefsohlf~wéswhenyoucorrmtted»!ithe

Hej§;jm§going1tglassessgpuni§hment§ét§li§§ear§Ttb;Serve,

'11…;111¢9@11§~1@¢&51'that»bef¢zé1Izpzaiaun¢é;séntéhceyan@ i§§m§§§jy§uj§@gtbeacustodypgf§theiSheriff£s$®§partmeht,lif there's anything you wish to say, you have an opportunity to say that at this time. Anything you want to say, sir?

THE DEFENDANT: (Via Interpreter) Yes. That I do not feel myself guilty. And as my wife promised to me, that she was going to do this to me because she was enraged against me. And she also counseled the girl. I|do not feel guilty. And only they know. This is not the first time that they get me into trouble. Problems. But it had not been this much. I‘ve been around a lot of young girls, and I have a lot

of family, nephews and nieces, and I have done nothing to

DEBRA ALVARADO`CAMERON, CSR, RPR

°\IOLUME 7

anyone. THE coURT= Is that all?

THE DEFENDANT: (Via Interpreter) I wQuld have

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

wanted for my lady, the only witness that I` had, for her to

M' (jhe CM.¢ M(;§M(/m{cw,/§) mP»e.l/erdwmo+cowd@' "1‘"

THE COURT: Is that the one you say that was going to exonerate you, or that, rather, the one that you said was going to pay you back? Let me ask you, just to follow your thinking-there or -- at what point did your wife say that to you? Before or after you spanl

THE DEFENDANT: ('\/'ia Interpreter) When she came to visit me, she said that she knew how. the girl. was; that she was in problems. And, well, I told her, Well, I don't feel guilty. Just simply bring the girl to come and tell the truth. Because if they say one_ thing, both of them, but it's not true, I do not feel guilty. I would have run, but I surrendered myself. I do not feel guilty for a spanking that I gave her only. Mg}:/LL#@{ lam ha S`}CyfaHLG/:CON£C hdw:

THE coURT= well --

THE DEFENDANT: (Via Interpreter).'_ That's your decision. I accept whatever you give me. But be considerate, also. l

THE COURT: Just for the record, again,

obviously, you had all of your rights afforded to yL/. You

DEBRA ALVARADO CAMERON, CSR, RPR

\/OLUNE 7

had a right to an attorney. You had an attorney appointed to you to represent you. You had a right to have a jury trial.

You waived that right. You had a right to confront witnesses

. {, `\.._/

j21

against you, as you requested, and that happened. You had the witness and the victim here present, so both of you can see the witness or victim here and so that you could question her

through your attorney. And, again, if you were to look

vclosely at your testimony, even at the statements that you

made right now, there are a lot of contradictions in what you

_ say.v And, again, if there's nothing else, then, at this time,

the Court, having found you guilty of the offense of indecency with a child by contact, Felony 2, as alleged in the, indictment, the Court has assessed a sentence of ll years to serve, and at this time, I'm pronouncing sentence and -- or, remanding you to the custody of the Sheriff's Department so that you can continue -- or continue serving. You will be

l _ _ GZ§¢%§§O&HFF given credit for any time that you've served, so you'll continue serving your sentence of ll years in the Institutional Division of the State of Texas. Good luck-to you, sir. We'll stand in recess.

THE BAILIFF: All rise, please.

~(Bench trial concluded)

***'k'k

111"11\1$0'?21\4£ ccom OFTHE » 1011\15‘0 arms 'Tro, mm

` TL\F, sum 01 TEYAS,`\@%@\\':

`§m£ Coom O`Fcrzmmc\L/\?PEALS DEN‘€!NG HEVlFW/f ` ;Q NOR\MG M\) ORDE K" `

\\

Avvmon< c'

_______________:____________________________________________________

m®mww X._. .ZOM

mm© _>E oo:‘

wmvm©mv &. OO._, - .:ZD _ >mm_>_._< _

x_o_O _m_woo< _®n< ..Ao_ Amvv dow wo_ ; ___ M_.__,s@__

___>> m _o.w co__mo__aam Em:cmwg:w w_£ __00_ …__N_M<_>_._<

mrom mv Z_\=.mm®wcv»ooo.

____N. sss s ________ ____ _ 1111 §._@ §_1__.,._.. mw>__om >wz:a AA UO__~_o no E:oo zoE mo;oz a<_o_&o

me m._.<>_mn_ _ COL >_.n

m..\..mm...,n...n».\.i....¢ .... ...

____ ________________________________________.________________._..:_____:__:___._ m__m..m.._..__

smm_§ § __,__o~_

m\ ss_sss_ ____ 09 - :z__ _ >…_w_>__< <1_m1<§<~ mwos

__S_SN \£_w\~ __s__o s_sss_<_ss _s_ a s ssm _B ; s< _oo__.,__n__ _>__~_o moo_o xm: sss_ss sssssfs

.___ §___sos\_. 1a

. .lr»\~

E>> m _o__ co___mo_ am Em:cown:w w_…_t _mp_c :o___:>> _:o£_>> coww_c_w_c mmc taco mck

mo- mmv_mw- m>> . Q..L_.._. _._<

_ 2 f mooo §va .,m,.mwmw_®.m _ Q».

s_s~ a_>o_,_ ssss§ssss _ww._ mms w._.<>_mm EQNEE:‘ § ms _. s__

smm@@@_w ____ mw mo.._ >.r._§w¢

§§wi_x.__; ___ Q.W __ wm w§m.» 10 m_§»w

___,\_____ r_,s_son_mw%wo , mmmz_n:m ad_m~uw.._&. __

»_... 255 m.:¢0 .._O 5500 EONE mU:¢OZ n<_UI.._O

m_.oN`o fm __

:\.l.¢|.\.l» fl..¢\. .ll\l. .

m_

x. :.._ ..i](

/

_ ____ ___ ____ ___®000______% s _&s___s__z /_s__§§s§@s ___.: :§ _____3 §___0_,$_>___£ w__s_d Q,s_____s__ ass as_._s@ sles______,._ ___+_>_. :s____a§ _,_s¢ §§ § __E i________s_____sw___ssu …1___0____0 _______n @__xd+m ____________ ____,_______ _§__ a

5¢_§__)_

1.»¢\\\. __ __ d 34 ama o$_&w§ §s.___.s_:____sw §®\s_€ ../so__+£® o §§ sam _ \___i, q§_s §§ _s_»js ®s_sss»ss_£a_ §§ nw §__c_o_ __s ___________ s£___s__sawss ssi _____________ q___ss_ss §§ § s§s__. _s_§_ _________ ____ ss__+s__,_£__ _ 3 __sw 3____£__030, mg _+ds_ m

________ s ___ss____.§____ ___ ___ _§__ s

mm 301/rams worn owns umst §m£s TR|MC/\se mm 2106»;1§- 583 »- 0‘\

I%€ AL\)ARMG, 911111011111 wm \I 6 1

wesm¢; 0111111,`@1 1`\\’;

' Mm\\m crawch 001-01'1\111 Avr>cm’i

` A;vmm)f b"'

TExAs couRT oF cF=:1MlNAL vAPPEALS,

Austin, Taxas M A N ‘D A _T'E

EATE 'GF TEXA' S,

rig

alj

"Y"¢' 11

To THE 40_6TH DISTRICT COURT OF WEBB COUNTY - GREETINGS= . _

Before our COURT 'OF CRIMINAL vAPPEALS, on the JUNE 16, 2010,` the cause upon an Application for Writ of H-abeas Corpus styled: `

4 EX PARTE JOSE ZAMA_ li»'.RIPA ALVARADO

CCRA No._Af_-Z_Qz$_65_ rr. Crr. Ns._ggg§g_lgssw-D¢;(A) ~ was .determi_ned; and therein our said COURT OF CRl_l\/HNAL APPEALS made its order in these words: HThis cause came on to be heard on the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and the same being considered, because it is the Opinion of this Court that the relief prayed for should be Granted, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND'DECREED that an out-of time appeal is GRANTED, in accordance with the Opinion of- this Court, and that this Decision be certified below for Observance." _

WHEREFORE, We command you to observe theorder of our said COURT OF CRIMINAI_,

APPEALS in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE SH_A_RON KELLER, Presiding Judge _' . of our said COURT OF CR IMINAL APPEALS, with the Seal thereof annexed, at the City of Austin,

on this day J_1_1l312,2010.

\rl\oui I:PEAi 101\_r Ci_sri<

\ ;_\ 1/\~, Chiet Deputy Clerl< Abel/\co

.i_`_

111 1115 511 wants could omit ` UN\tE 0 STATES

ma cast tt<>.- 1009<“§'€9“'”4

305€2\1\111111)0,1>€111101)€11 11151. ~\) 5.

\‘ 1 _ 111';51111; mem eta\l.

. "‘1)111§01 wynn

` Eactmicoomo"rmeats 11111<111116. cts'c"

imame §

Fage lof-8

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE ZAMARRIPA ALVARADO, ' No. 08-10-0021-1--CR» . Appellant, ' Appeal from the v. ' 406th District Court THE sTATE oF TEXAS, l Of Webb Counry, rean Appellee. ` » (TC# 2008-CRS-000589)

0 P I N I 0 N ,

In a bench trial, Appellant, Jose Zamarripa Alvarado, was found guilty of indecency with a child by contact and was sentenced to confinement for eleven years. On appeal, Appellant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance and that the evidence presented in the guilt-innocence phase of trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction We affirm.

BACKGROUNI_)

By indictment, Appellant was charged with indecency with a child by contact. The complainant was C.J., the eleven-year old daughter of Appellant’s wife.

At trial, C.J. testified that Appellant, her mother, and her two sisters slept on two mattresses in one room. Appellant and C.J.’s mother slept on one mattress, and C.J. and her sisters slept on the other mattress, which was separated from the adults’ bed. C.J’s mother always slept closest to her daughters’ mattress, and C.J. always slept closest to her mother. On or about April l, 2007, C.J. went to bed with her clothes on, including underwear, blue jeans, and a blouse. C.J. awoke in the night because she saw and felt Appellant using his hand to touch her genitals underneath her underwear.

Appellant was in the bed where C.J.’s mother usually slept. After waking up to find Appellant

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionlD=3 7fe7a72-aOOf-484f-. .. 3/17/2015

rage 2 or 3'

touching her in this way, C.J. moved away from where she was and Appellant left the room for five to ten minutes. Appellant then returned to the adult bed and lay down where he usually slept.

According to Yuridiana de Carmen Aranda, the certified outcry witness from the Children’s Advocacy Center of Laredo who interviewed C.J. and testified at trial, C.J. reported that Appellant ~had unbuttoned C.J.’s pants and touched C.J.’s vagina underneath her underwear with his han'd, causing C.J. pain. n

Laredo Police Investigator Carlos Villarreal testified that he viewed the video recording of C.J.’s outcry statement and asked Appellant to come to the police station so that he could speak with Appellant about the allegations After Villarreal advised Appellant of his constitutional rights in English and Spanish, Appellant indicated that he understood his rights, placed his initials next to each of the recited constitutional rights and wrote the Word, “Si,” in answer to the questions, “Do you understand your rights?” and “Do you elect to waive [your rights] and speak with us at this time?” Within fifteen minutes, Appellant had completed his written statement and was provided an opportunity to review the statement and make any changes or alterations Appellant’s written and signed warnings and voluntary statement were admitted into evidence over the objection of Arturo Gallegos, Appellant’s trial counsel. Appellant’s confession, which Appellant wrote by hand in

Spanish, was read into the record by Villarreal and translated by the trial court’s interpreter:

I, Jose Alvarado, make the following statement That as [C.J.] accuses me of having touched her private part, I confess that it was so, but without bad intention. lt was because of accident. Because my lady, in other words, her mother, was supposed to be in the place that [C.J.] was at. And it was dark. l could not see. And since I’m always touching my lady, I got there and stuck my hand in her. But when I heard her talk, I removed my hand from there. She was not supposed to be in that place. But from there onwards, l tried that it will never happen again, and I never stick my hand into my lady until l am sure that it is her.

Although Appellant attempted to suppress the statement in a pretrial hearing, arguing that it was involuntarily.made because he was intoxicated, did not understand his rights, and was not informed of a right to counsel,~the trial court had found that Appellant’s Mz`rana'a rights were read to him and that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived them, and then ruled that Appellant’s

statement was admissible in evidence

http://www.search.tXcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=3 7fe7a72-a00f-484jf-. .. 3/17/2015

r'age 3 or 9

Appellant testified both at the suppression hearing and at trial. At trial, Appellant alleged that he did not understand the warnings provided to him before making his statement, that he wrote down what he was told to write at the police station, explained that his definition of “private parts” includes “the breasts, in front on the bottom, and on the back,” and declared that he only touched C.J.’s buttocks in the mistaken belief that he wastouching his wife. Appellant testified that he spanked C.J. as he routinely and lovingly spanks his wife, and remarked,' “lf that is touching, yes, I did touch her.” As he had at the suppression hearing, Appellant again testified that his statement was involuntarily made and denied any wrongdoing

At the conclusion of the guilt-innocence phase of the bench trial, the trial court found beyond a reasonable doubt that Appellant was read his Miranda rights and knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived them when he consented to provide the voluntary statement that was admitted into evidence, and after taking into consideration all of the evidence that was presented, found Appellant guilty of knowingly engaging in sexual contact with a child. During the punishment phase, the trial court noted that Appellant’s_statement that he stuck his hand in but removed it when he heard C.J. speak was inconsistent with spanking. The trial court also declared that it took into consideration the appearance and expression of C.J. when she testified and likewise considered the demeanor and manner in which Appellant expressed himself in responding to some of the questions and providing explanations during his testimony Although the State had offered Appellant plea agreements involving sentences of two years and three years, the trial court sentenced Appellant to eleven years’ confinement so that Appellant would “remember this act that [Appellant] committed [upon] an innocent ll-year-old girl” and would remember how old-C.J. was when Appellant committed the_ offense.

DISCUSSION I. 4 In Issue One,. Appellant contends trial counsel was ineffective and prejudiced his defense, thereby depriving him of a fair trial. Appellant specifically complains that Mr. Gallegos rendered ineffective assistance of counsel because: (1) Mr. Gallegos’ statements‘and acts before the trial court

in relation to Appellant’s refusal to accept the State’s plea offers undermined Appellant’s presumption

http ://www.search.txcourts.gov/Searchl\/Iedia.aspx?MediaVersionlD=3 7fe7a72-a0f)f-484f-... 3/17/2015

r'age/i 018

ofinnocence; (2) Mr. Gallegos failed to file a notice of appeal; (3) Mr. Gallegos placed his own interests above Appellant’s right to a fair trial without prejudice; (4) Mr. Gallegos failed to “invoke the rule” during the suppression hearing; (5) Mr. Gallegos failed to object to “numerous leading questions” from the complaining witness; (6) Mr. Gallegos permitted exhibits to be improperly admitted without certified translation-thereof; (7) Mr. Gallegos failed to ask for a directed verdict; and (8) Mr. Gallegos failed to argue that the evidence against Appellant was insufficient to support his conviction a j

ln judging any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the benchmark must be “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Stricklana’ v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.Zd 674 (1984). We analyze claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment by applying a two-prong test. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686; Ex parte Chana'ler, 182 S.W.3d 350, 353 (Tex.Cr`im.App. 2005). Under this framework, Appellant must'prove by preponderance of the evidence that his counsel’s performance 'was deficient and there is a reasonable probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the result that the outcome would have been different but for counsel’s deficient performance Ex parte Chandler, 182 S.W.3d at 353, citing Stricklana', 466 U.S. at 694.

To establish deficient performance under the first prong of Strickland, Appellant must show that counsel was not acting as a reasonably competent attorney and that his advice was not within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases. Ex parte Chana’ler, 182 S.W.3d at 354, citing Stricklana', 466 U.S. at 687. Appellant must overcome the strong presumption that counsel’s conduct fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689. Thus, Appellant must overcome the presumption that, under the circurnstances, counsel’s challenged conduct may be considered sound trial strategy, Miniel v. State, 831 S§W.Zd 310, l323 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992), citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689; While strategic choices made after thorough investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible choices are virtually unchallengeable, counsel’s cited strategy does not prevent a reviewing court from determining whether a specific act or

omission was outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance Ia'. _ We judge the

httr)://www.search.txcourts.gov/Searchl\/ledia.asnx?MediaVersionID=3 7fe7a72-a00f-484f-. .. 3/17/2015

rage 50r 8

reasonableness of counsel’s performance according to prevailing professional norms which includes an examination of all the facts and circumstances involved in a particular case See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688, 690. _

To meet his burden under the second prong of Strickland, Appellant must establish that counsel’S constitutionally deficient performance prejudiced his defense§ he must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Ex parte Chandler, 182 S.W.3d at 354, citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. A “reasonable probability” is “a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. Any constitutionally deficient acts or omissions will be considered in light of the totality ofthe evidence before the judge or jury when making this determination Strickland, 466 U.S. at 695; Ex parte Nailor, 149 S.W.3d 125, 130 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004).

- The record on appeal must affirmatively demonstrate trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness

Bone v.v State, 77 S.W.3d 828, 835 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002). As the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has repeatedly~said,- a reviewing court will rarely be able to fairly evaluate the merits of an ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim on direct appeal because the record on direct appeal is usually undeveloped and inadequately reflective of counsel’s reasons for his or her actions at trial. Mata v. State, 226 S.W.3d 425, 430 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007); compare Cannon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 342, 350 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008) (although rare, trial record was sufficient to permit appellate court to decide merits of ineffective-assistance claim). “The lack of a clear record usually will prevent the appellant from meeting the first part of the Stricklana' test, as the reasonableness of counsel’s choices and motivations duringtrial can be proven deficient only through facts that do not normally appear in the appellate record.” Mam, 226 s.W.3d 31430.

l , After conducting a thorough review, we find the record before us underdeveloped and silent

. l . s regarding the motivations underlying counsel’s tactical de`cisions.[_1 VY!§_flnd_nothinan_lherecoLd__ thatjl_ppnises us of counsel’s reasons for his acts or omissions at trial and about which AppellantMM

complains in this direct appeal. Consequently, Appellant has not overcome the strong presumption

that counsel’s conduct was reasonable See Mallett v. State, 65 S.W.3d 59, 63 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001).

“[C]ollateral attack may be . . . the vehicle by Which a thorough and detailed examination of alleged

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionlD=3 7fe7a72-a00f-484f-... 3/17/2015

cage 6 ui g

ineffectiveness may be developed and spread upon a record.” Ex. parte Dufj§), 607 S.W.2d 507, 513 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980). Issue One is overruled. l

4 l 11.

In Issue Two, Appellant contends the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove beyond aireasonable doubt the essential element of intent. We disagree

' Standard of Review

in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, we view all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893, 895 (Tex.Crim.App. 2010); Clayt_on v. State, 235 S.W.3d 772, 778 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). Such a standard not only gives full play to the responsibility of the trier of fact to resolve conflicts in the testimony and to weigh the evidence accordingly, but it also enables the fact finder to draw reasonable inferences from basic to ultimate facts. Jackson, 443 U.S.-at 319; Clayton', 235 S.W.3d at 778. Indeed, the trier of fact is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence, see Brown v. State, 270 S.W.3d 564, 568 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008), cert. denied, 129 S.Ct. 2075, 173 L.Ed.2d 1139 (2009), and therefore we, in performing our sufficiency review, may not re-evaluate the weight and credibility of the evidence and substitute our judgment for that of the fact finder. Dewberry v. State, 4 S.W.3d 735, 740 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999), cert denied, 529 U.S. 1131, 120 S.Ct. 2008, 146 L.Ed.2d 958 (2000). lnstead, we determine whether the-necessary inferences are reasonable based upon the combined and cumulative force of all the evidence when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.~Hooper v. _State, 214 S.W.3d 9, l6-17 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). Moreover, we presume that the fact finder resolved any conflicting inferences in favor of the verdict and defer to that resolution. Jackson, 443 U.S. at 326; Clayton, 235 S.W.3d at 778.

The indictment charged Appellant with indecency with a child and alleged:

[O]n or about the lst day of April, A.D., 2007 and anterior to the presentment of this indictment, in the County and State aforesaid, JOSE Z. ALVARADO, did then and there intentionally or knowingly, engage in sexual contact with “C.J.”, a child younger than 17 years of age, and not the spouse of JOSE Z. ALVARADO, by touching

http://www.search.tx`courts.gov/Sear'chMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=3 7fe7a72-a00f-484f-. .. 3/17/2015

rage 7 ur 3

“C.J.’s” genitals with his hand, with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person,~ including his own sexual desire, Against the Peace and Dignity of the State. ` ` '

Thus, to prove Appellant committed attempted aggravated sexual assault, the State was required to show that on or about April 1, 2007, Appellant intentionally or knowingly touched C.J.’s genitals with his hand with the intent to arouse or gratify his own sexual desire or that of another person and that C.J. was under the age of 17 and was not Appellant’s spouse at the time of the offense TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11(a)(1), (b)(l)(West 2011). 1

A person acts intentionally, or with intent with respect to the nature of his conduct or to a result of his conduct when it is his conscious objective or desire to engage in conduct or cause the result. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 6.03(a)(West 2011). Proof of a culpable mental state generally relies upon circumstantial evidence Rodriguez v. State, 793 S.W.2d 744, 748 (Tex.App. - San Antonio,_.l 990, no pet.)._ Circumstantial evidence of an_accused’s-mental state is not treated differently than circumstantial evidence of other elements and is reviewed under the same standard as direct evidence Laster _v. State, 275 S.W.3d 512, 521 (Tex.Crim.App. 2009). Moreover, intent can be inferred from an accused’s actions, words, and conduct. Guevara v. State, 152 S.W.3d 45, 50 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004); Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999); Gallegos v. State, 340 S.W.3d 797, 802 (Tex.App. - San Antonio 2011, no pet.). An.accused’s intent is a question of fact to be determined by the fact finder from all the facts and circumstances in evidence Hemphill v. State, 505 S.W.2d 560, 562 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974). The specific intent required in proving indecency with a child may be inferred from a defendant’s conduct, his remarks, and all of the surrounding circumstances See McKenzie v. State, 617 S.W.2d 211, 216 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981). An oral expression of intent is not required and the conduct itself is sufficient to infer intent. C.F. v. Statej 897 S.W.2d 464, 472 (Tex.App. - El Paso 1995, no writ). v

ln his voluntary statement, Appellant admitted that he touched C.J.’_s “private.part” but stuck his hand in her under the mistaken belief that he was touching his wife and removed his hand when he heard C.J. speak. At trial, Appellant admitted touching C.J.’s buttocks, described the touching as a

spanking, denied touching C.J.’s genitals, and claimed the touching was accidental because he

believed he was contacting his wife Rather, Appellant stated that it was not his intention to touch

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=3 7fe7a72-a00f-484f-... 3/17/2015

rage 9 or 9

C.J. as he intended to spank his wife as he did routinely. Appellant denied that he spanked C.J. to satisfy any sexual desire l l

C.J. testified that when she awoke, she felt and saw Appellant’s hand touching her genitals

underneath the blue jeans and underwear that she had worn to bed and that Appellant was located

l where her mother usually slept. Ms. Aranda, the outcry witness, testified that C.J., cried upon being interviewed, pointed to an anatomical drawing to show that Appellant had touched her vagina, causing her pain, and disclosed that Appellanthad unbuttoned the pants she was wearing and touched her under her underwear.

Having viewed this conflicting evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we find the trial court’s inference of intent from the evidence is reasonable based upon the combined and cumulative force of all the evidence and we conclude that any rational trier of fact could have found the essential»element of intent beyond a reasonable doubt. Hooper, 214 S.W.3d at 16-17; Jackson, 443 U.S. at 326; Clayton, 235 S.W.3d at 778. Issue Two is overruled

». . CONCLUSIOl\i

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed

January 18, 2012 v GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.

(Do Not Publish)

m Appellant’s brief includes an affidavit that is not contained in either the clerk’s record or the reportcr’s record, the two components which comprise the appellate record, TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. We may not consider factual assertions that are outside the record, nor may a party circumvent this prohibition by submitting'an affidavit for the first time on appeal. Whitehead v. State, 130 S.W.3d 866, 872 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004).

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionlD=3 7fe7a72-a00f-484f-. .. 3/17/2015

lN THE SUPRENE COURT OF THE Ul\l lTED STF~.iE$

TmAL cast 110. 1008»(,1<5-€3¢1» 01

Ic)sr’At\»Muoo, renewal tm 5a

\/5,

fur sting or mAg,"e,l a|l."

1 RP;SPO`NS'E Tt> l\P\>L\Ctt't\ot\l 11'07?10 Se. starts ResPoNsr rewrite tEv\Ew. 141101211116 w oKoER,,

`Mnmuf

NO. WR-73,l33-03 TRIAL COURT NO. 2008-CRS-000589 D4 (C)

EX PARTE _ § IN THE DISTRICT COURT ..... ' §__ 1_. ~_ _. _` JOSE ALVARADO ZAMARRIPA § 406th JUDICIAL DISTRICT . § a _ , § WEBB COUNTY, TEXAS

_ APPLICANT

STATE’S RESPONSE TO THE SUBSEOUENT APPLICATIO'N FOR A WRI'I` OF HABEAS CORPUS

To THE HoNoRABLE JUDGE oF rrn; 406TH DISTRICT COURT AND THE _HoNoRABLE JUDGES or THE COURT or cRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES THE STATE, by and through her undersigned Assistant

District Attorney, and files this response to the subsequent application for a writ of

habeas corpus filed by Jose Alvarado Zamarripa (“Applicant”), and would

respectfully show the Court as follows:

I. FACTS

..':' -`_`_’

The Applicant was convicted of indecency with a child by contact lie

,,._)-_`

admitted to penetrating an ll-year ol girl but clalmed t at he thou ht the egi_rl was __ __.,\ L 5 g ,__,¢. ' M:e n:jmmft n I\ net/a m any `/

his Wife. Alvara 0 v /?State No. 08-10-00211-CR, 2012 WL 150 57, 2012 Tex. App. L§XIS 381, ’_"3, *5 ('l`ex. App.-_El Paso 2012). After a bench trial, he was convicted and sentenced to eleven years of incarceration; in imposing that

sentence, the Court aimed to ensure that, as the Applicant/would ruminate over his

STATE’S RESPONSE TO THE APPLlCATlON FOR-A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PAGE l Ol-` l l

II. GENERAL DENIAL

The State generally denies any and ‘all allegations in the Application.

-Additionally, the State would further respond with specific denials as follows:

Qw»“// mut iii fn ct neal fw`cil w/‘il¢fh<;f/i/ih> .

,III. APPLICATION IS BARRED FOR FAILURE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY GROUNDS COULD NOT HAVE BEEN RAISED IN A FREVIOUS APPLICATION

Article 1.1.07, section 4(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure prohibits review of subsequent applications for writ of habeas corpus except in limited

circumstances._ The applicant must establish one of the following exceptions:

(l) the current claims and issues have not been and could not have been presented previously 1n an original application or in a previously considered application filed under this article because the factual or legal basis for the claim was unavailable on the date the application filed the previous application; or

' (2) by a»preponderance of evidence, but for a violation of the United States Constitution no rational juror could have found the applicant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. -

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §§ 4(a); Ex parte Brooks, 219 S.W.3d 396, 399 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). The Applicant must therefore show why “the factual or

legal basis `f`or the claim was unavailable on the date the application filed the

previous application” or that there are “sufficient specific facts establishing by a

STATE’s RESPONSE To THE APPLiCATioN FOR A Wer oF HAE§EAS CORPUS PAGE 3 oF l l

Ground Four: “I believe [1 made the]

Detective mad when l [hid] but this is just a personal problem [between him] and me when he arrested me I told him

light’ someday” (p. 9).

' "'The'*truth"“i's-'going~“to~~come~~to~~the~

Ground Four: “The main problem is that, the investigator Villarreal arrested him in retaliation. Investigator lied under oath in court because [he] denied

~[-i-t-]~to~be-~tr~ue,-“but`“l?et-itioner»can_~prov.e-. » f

it.” (p. 12).

Ground Five: “I told my counsel that I can prove that confession doesn’t have any value[,] it was a trade for my .Driver’s License with [Detective] Carlos V. on May 8, 2007. 1 signed the invented confession in exchange for my D.L. ...” (p. 10).

Ground Five: “Later, [the] investigator made. a deal with Petitioner ‘(driver’s license for a confession)[.] Petitioner invented a false statement to please the investigator and stop the harassments from investigator’s necple.”z (p. 14).

See above.

Ground Six: “Petitioner made a false confession because investigator promised to stop the harassment[.] After investigator obtained the confession, he sent the people in his [conspiracy] to ..§ [coerce] Petitioner’s 1 wife into his scheme plot.” (p. 16).

See above. _

Ground Seven: “A police detective Villarreal unlawfully obtained by force a false, and invented statement from Petitioner...” (p. 17)

Ground Eight: “Petitioner explained his innocence and gave [counsel] all the [Petitioner’s version of the] facts of the case and witnesses on his behalf and how the false confession was obtained...” (p. 18)

As `to Applicant’s ninth ground, asserting ineffective assistance of counsel

(IAC) on appeal, the State would further assert that Applicant’s second writ

2 Petitioner goes.on to accuse the investigator of stealing his identity, “surely to use or sell it.” (New Application, p. 14) _

STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE APPLlCATlON FOR A WRlT OF HABEAS CORPUS PAGE 5 OF l l

Ground Two is a speedy trial claim in which Applicant states that he was “confined and deprived of life in Webb County jail from May 14, 2007, to """""` ”"°"`"Septernber"l'7',“.200ST*Arrd‘n‘o“comp‘l'aints;~ in'di'ctment-or~information~-was~presente d»~»~~~ ~» -~ _ _[until September 2008].”_ (Third Application, p. 8)._ appellant has not alleged that

he' ever requested a speedy trial before he was tried, and as such, has waived the issue and cannot obtain relief. See Hartjiela’ v. Thaler, 403 S.W.3d 234, 239-40

(Tex. Crim. App.` 2013).

Ground 'l`hree claims that Applicant’s conviction was “obtained by use of extortion and threat” because the detectives allegedly extorted “Petitioner’s wife (offered to pay the house rent if she file[d] the restraining order).” This claim does not state a specific legal basis and so does not assert a ground for relief. Ex parte Hogan, 556 S.W.2d 352 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). Further, it is repetitive of the claim denied by the Court of Criminal Appeals in the second application See Ex Parte Robertson, No. WR~37,983-08, 2014 WL 969714 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 12, 2014) (not designated for publication) (sanctioning another child molester who

made similar repetitive claims).

Ground Four is inexplicably labeled “Trial Court Lacked; ` Authority to Dismiss with Prejudice.” The substance of the claim is a repetition of` the speedy trial ground and an assertion that the ‘_‘court should have dismissed the case at the

moment, because even on record is not on file the complaint, arrest warrant or any

STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE APPLlCATlON FOR A WRlT 013 HABEAS CORPUS PAGE 7 OF 1 l

Finally, Ground Nine contains an assertion that Applicant’s appellate

attorney was allegedly ineffective because he should have raised an additional

n~........w...~_.~~~g.ro\.md~..that;__th`ere..was~fno_corn.p.lai.nts,_»no.arreSt_.v.\/.al'l’.arlt,».élnd.r1.O.*i11di.C.tHl§;llt_.i_ll._...`... . '..~

sixteen months of Petitioner’s custody”-the same speedy-trial claim as in Grounds Two and Three. ln his memorandum; -Appellant points only to`Federal Rule`of Criminal Procedure 34(a) and a series of off-topic cases as justifying his alleged entitlement to reversal. (Mernorandum at pp. 19-20).' Essentially, Applicant’s core argument is based on Article 32.01 of the Code of Criminal Procedure’s 180-day limit on pre-indictment custody'. lt_`, however, a grand jury has returned an indictment by the time the Article 32.01 claim is made, thecourt is no longer required to release the defendant from custody. Grij’is v. State, --- S.W.3d ~- --, No. 04-12-00237-CR, 2014 WL 1688099 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Apr. 30, 201_4) (citing Ex parte Countrjyman, 226 S.W.3d 435, 436-39 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)); see Tatum v. State, 505 S.W.2d 548, 550 ('l`ex. Crim. App. 1974) (cited by Applicant and yet holding that “Art. 32.01 has no application once an indictment is returned even though it is returned by a grand jury at a subsequent term of court.”). ’ Simply put, there is no authority for Appellant’s proposition that Article 32._01 would entitle him to release after he has not only been indicted, but also convicted.

As such, the Applicant would not be able to demonstrate that, had his appellate

STATE’S RESPONSE TO THE APPLlCATlON FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS l PAGE 9 OF l l

CER'H`EFECATE @1*` SERVECE

On October 6, 2014, a copy of this document was served on the Applicant §tf Josis ArvARADo TDCJ#15651`98 RAl\/IS§Y UNIT 1

1 100 FM 655 ROSHARON, TX 77583-7670

l by certified mail, return receipt requested

Davi_c:l»~l[i."Reuthinger, Jr. ,

STATE’s RESPONSE To THE APPL!CATloN FOR A WRlT oF HABEAS CORPUS PAGE l l 01~' l \

`\.

' Ex PARTE

TRIAL COURT NO. 2008-CRS-000589-D4 (D)

§ rN THE DISTRICT COURT “ § . JosE ALvARADo ZAMARRIPA § 406TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT y § d . / APPLICANT § wEBB coUNTY, TExAs

STATE’S RESPONSE TO THE APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

NOW COMES THE STATE OF TEXAS, by and through the undersigned Ass1st`anf

11 ..( ;"\'1 ;;‘ E,i:-?/d

District Attorney, and files this response to the application for a writ of habeas §Qrpus:§led`by‘

--

Jose Alvarado Zamarripa (hereinafter “Applicant”), and would respectfully show unto the) Cou’

l

1 '*(~1:3 § , , as follows: 53 et - §~,-- <~> '1:.-. '::\~) m C,? "‘"i C.) C 1 __;.;. >< m r'~' § (;,l l'< y "rc I' ' »<. ch w 35 r»f*' FACTS

On January 28, 2009, a judgment of conviction was entered against Applicant on a charge

(l new adm rli’ezi‘i of indecency with a child by contact. He admitted to penetrating an 11-year old girl but claimed he thought the girl was his wife. _Alvarado v. State, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 381, *3, *5 (Tex. App. - Waco 2012). He was sentenced to eleven years’ incarceration He appealed, and the appeal was assigned to the Eighth Court of Appeals, which affirmed the conviction. Ld_. at ’1‘16.

He has yet another habeas petition before this Honorable Court. This petition, like those before

it_, largely raises the issues he urged on appeal. His arguments have been rejected previously;and

this application should likewise be refused.

State’s Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Page l Of 7

II. GENERAL DENIAL The State generally denies each and every allegation in the Application. Additionally,’ the "S`t'a`te would further respond with‘the'followin'g` specific d"e‘nials:' ' ' ` ` III. THE APPLICATION IS REPETITIVE 'OF APPLICANT’S EARLIER FILINGS AND SHOULD BE DISMISSED The Court is requested to take judicial notice of the previous applications for writ of habeas corpus filed by Applicant. The issues raised in Applicant’s current filing are the same arguments he has urged in his previous applications, arguments already rejected by this Court. Sec. 4 (a) If a subsequent application of writ of habeas corpus is filed after final disposition of an initial application challenging#the same conviction, a court may not consider the merits of or grant relief based on the subsequent application unless the application contains sufficient specific facts establishing that:

j (l) the current claims and issues have not been and could not have been presented previously in an original application or in a previously considered application filed under this article because the factual or legal basis for the claim was unavailable on the date the application filed the previous application; or

(2)_by a preponderance of the evidence, but for a violation of the United States Constitution no rational juror could have found the applicant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Tex. Code Crim. Pro. Art. 11.07 §`4(a) (2013). IV. As revealed by even a cursory review of the Application, each of the grounds stated by the Applicant are issues that he has raised previously or that he could have raised in one of his

previously applications While he has changed some of his wording, Applicant continues to

claim essentially the same grounds:

State’s Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus ` Page 2 of 7

l. Unlawful Search and Seizure with Intent to Obtain a False Confession and Use of Perjury to Obtain a Confession;

2. Conviction Obtained by Use of Unlawful Arrest in Retaliation without Arrest warrant and withb`ut Miranaaaights being Read;" ' “ -

3. Defendant in Custody Sixteen Months’No Indictment or Inforrnation Presented, and Impossible Offense Date;

v 4. ffective Assistance of Counsel was Denied at Trial; and

5. Effective Assistant of Counsel was Denied on Appeal.

Each and every 4one of these claims was or could have been presented in his previous applications There is nothing new here. Each of these matters was raised in at trial, in Applicant’s appeal, and/or one of his previous applications for writ of habeas corpus. j

l l V.

Even if one were to charitably assume that Applicant’s repackaging of his claims presented an argument not made in one of his previous applications, he may not now make that argument for the first time. lt should have been, and under the Code of Criminal Procedure, was required to have been urged in his first application

.We have previously determined that §_4_ was intended “to limit a convicted

person to "one_ bite at the apple.’ ” Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469, 474

1Tex.Crim.App.l9971. Interpreting “subsequent applications” under §_4 to include

all applications for writs of habeas corpus regarding the same conviction would

most effectively achieve the Legislature_’s objective.

Exparte Whiteside, 12 S.W.3d 819, 821 (Tex. Crim. App. '2000). Applicant:has not

demonstrated why the factual or legal basis for his claim was unavailable previously or

that there are “sufficient facts establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that, but

State’s Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Page 3 of 7

for a constitutional violation, no rational juror would have found Applicant guilty.” For

that reason, this application, like the previous ones, must fail. RESPONS§S TO APPLICANT’S INDIVIDUAL GROUNDS

Applicant’s allegation regarding an unlawful search and seizure is a Fourth Amendme-nt Claim that must be raised on direct appeal and cannot be considered for the first time on habeas. Ex parte Kirby, 492 S.W.2d 579, 581 (Tex. Crim. App. .1973)`.

VII.

Likewise, Applicant’s allegation that his confession should have been suppressed because, he claims, he was not properly Mirandized may not be considered on habeas. Such a claim-must be objected to at trial. If it was not, it is barred on habeas. liansonv. _s_rar_e, 767 s.w.z`d 96 "(Tex. Crim.` App. 19861.

VIII.

~ Nor is there legal merit to Applicant’s request for relief based upon his claim that he was confined from May l4, 2007 to September l7, 2008 during which time no complaints, indictment or information was presented There has been no allegation by Applicant that he requested a speedy trial before he went to trial. Accordingly,¢ he has waived that issue and MM@y. See Hartfield v. Thaler, 403 S.W.3d 234, 239-40 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

IX.

ln his fourth.ground, Applicant once again alleges ineffective assistance of trial

counsel. This allegation was made on appeal and was`rejected by the Eighth Court of

Appeals because he failed to establish that the allegedly deficient performance of his

/\ \

State’s Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Page 4 of 7

attorney prejudiced him or his case. On appeal, Applicant did not make the requisite showings required by Strickland v. Washington, 466 U_..S 668 (1984): “The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adv`er`s'ari'al` process that""'the"`tri`“al cannot be " relied on as having produced a just result.” I_<. Crim. App. 1993). X.

Applicant’s fifth and final ground is that he received ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal. In essence, Applicant complains that appellate counsel employed his town-appellate strategy and urged the issues he thought appropriate, rather than appealing the issues Applicant desired. lt is noteworthy that those issues bare the same ones he continues to put forth in his applications for habeas relief. Applicant’s primary complaint is that appellate counsel failed to advance a speedy-trial claim. Applicant’s argument is premised upon the 180-day limit on pre-indictment custody as set forth in Article 32.01 of the -Code of Criminal Procedure. However, if an indictment has been returned before _ an Article 32.01 claim is made, the court is'no longer required to release an accused from custody. Ex parte Countryman, 226 S.W.3d 435, 436-39 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). There is no support for the argument advanced by Applicant that he should be released from custody at this point in time when he has not only been indicted, but has been convicted. Even if his appellate attorney raised this issue, it would not have resulted inhis: release.

The result of the proceeding would have been the same. Accordingly, Applicant’s claim

State’s Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Page 5 of 7

that his appellate counsel was ineffective must fail. See Hernandez v. State, 988 S.W.2d 770, 770 n. 3 (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). XI. '""C`ONCI§USI’ON .` ' ` » ` ` " " “"""`"

This Court has denied the relief requested by Applicant in previous applications, and this application is nothing more than a repackaging of his prior grounds. As demonstrated above, none of the grounds alleged by Applicant has merit and each should be summarily denied.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES, ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES CONSIDERED, the State prays that the Application be refused and that the State have such other and further relief to which it may be justly entitled. b

b Respectfiilly submitted, 1s1DRo R. ALANIZ

DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR WEBB AND ZAPATA COUNTIES

//%m/ %//My;»/

MICHAEL BUKIEWICZ ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTQ /EY State Bar No. 03319900 /

1110 Victoria Street, Suite 401

Laredo, Texas 78040

956-523-4900

FAX: 956-523-5918

mbukiewicz@webbcountvtx.gov

State’s Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Page 6 of 7

_ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was forwarded to

the Applicant, Jose Alvarado Zamarri #1565198, at TDCJ Ramsey One Unit, 1100 FM 655, Rosharon, Texas 77583, on this / 12 % day of March, 2015, by certified mail, return receipt

requested

/////W/ W///Za wm

MiCHAEL BUKIEWICZ /? /

State’s Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus ` Page 7 of 7