Alton J. Bailey v. George Dixon

450 F.2d 1154, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6985
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alton J. Bailey v. George Dixon. Read the opinion of the Court — 451 F.2d 160
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 22, 1971·No. 71-2379·Published

Opinion

450 F.2d 1154

Alton J. BAILEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
George DIXON et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-2379 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1971.

Joseph A. Gladney, Baton Rouge, La., Johnnie A. Jones, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Joseph W. Cole, Jr., Port Allen, La., Julius Miller, New York City, for defendants-appellees.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG, and DYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See F.R.Civ.Pro. 12(h) (3); Harmon v. Superior Court, 9 Cir. 1962, 307 F.2d 796. See Local Rule 21.1

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alton J. Bailey v. George Dixon, 450 F.2d 1154, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6985 (5th Cir. 1971).

450 F.2d 1154 (Alton J. Bailey v. George Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related