Alton J. Bailey v. George Dixon
This text of 450 F.2d 1154 (Alton J. Bailey v. George Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alton J. BAILEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
George DIXON et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 71-2379 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 22, 1971.
Joseph A. Gladney, Baton Rouge, La., Johnnie A. Jones, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Joseph W. Cole, Jr., Port Allen, La., Julius Miller, New York City, for defendants-appellees.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG, and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See F.R.Civ.Pro. 12(h) (3); Harmon v. Superior Court, 9 Cir. 1962, 307 F.2d 796. See Local Rule 21.1
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 F.2d 1154, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alton-j-bailey-v-george-dixon-ca5-1971.