Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart
534 U.S. 1159, 122 S. Ct. 1170, 152 L. Ed. 2d 114, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 2085, 70 U.S.L.W. 3533, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1706, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1175
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 25, 2002·No. No. 00-725·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted, [1160]*1160judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co., ante, p. 438.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart, 534 U.S. 1159, 122 S. Ct. 1170, 152 L. Ed. 2d 114, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 2085, 70 U.S.L.W. 3533, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1706, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1175 (2002).
534 U.S. 1159 (Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Durant
89 F. App'x 56 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Aloe Energy Corp v. Comm Social Security
Third Circuit, 2002
Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart
39 F. App'x 783 (Third Circuit, 2002)