Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart

Third Circuit

Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart

39 F. App'x 783

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJuly 12, 2002

DocketNo. 99-3915

StatusPublished

This text of 39 F. App'x 783 (Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart, 39 F. App'x 783 (3d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[784]*784OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

Our judgment order affirming the order of the District Court was vacated by the United States Supreme Court and remanded for further consideration in light of Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co., 534 U.S. 438, 122 S.Ct. 941, 151 L.Ed.2d 908 (2002). See Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1170, 152 L.Ed.2d 114 (2002). The Supreme Court’s opinion in Barnhart rejects the basis for the District Court’s ruling, and ours as well. We conclude that there is no alternative basis argued by the Commissioner, including the “alter ego” theory, on which we would affirm. Accordingly, we will reverse the District Court’s order and remand to the District Court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Aloe.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[784]*784OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

Our judgment order affirming the order of the District Court was vacated by the United States Supreme Court and remanded for further consideration in light of Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co., 534 U.S. 438, 122 S.Ct. 941, 151 L.Ed.2d 908 (2002). See Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1170, 152 L.Ed.2d 114 (2002). The Supreme Court’s opinion in Barnhart rejects the basis for the District Court’s ruling, and ours as well. We conclude that there is no alternative basis argued by the Commissioner, including the “alter ego” theory, on which we would affirm. Accordingly, we will reverse the District Court’s order and remand to the District Court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Aloe.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 F. App'x 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aloe-energy-corp-v-barnhart-ca3-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack