Allpress v. McGill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Allpress v. McGill

246 S.W.2d 714, 1952 Tex. App. LEXIS 1972

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 13, 1952

DocketNo. 12380

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 246 S.W.2d 714 (Allpress v. McGill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allpress v. McGill, 246 S.W.2d 714, 1952 Tex. App. LEXIS 1972 (Tex. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

POPE, Justice.

This suit -concerns the right of a -party to recover liquidated damages and also actual damages upon the breach of a contract.

Appellant, Mrs. Eva Jo Allpress, prior to August 9, 1950, claimed that she had made certain improvements on a piece of real estate owned by appellee, Woodrow W. McGill. On that date the two parties entered into a written agreement by which appellee contracted to sell the property and pay appellant the sum of $4,000.00 out of the proceeds. Sin-ce certain liens existed against the property the sale was not made. Appellee sought a declaration of his rights as against appellant and she icross-acted for damages in the amount of $5,000.00. She claimed the sum she would have received had the sale -been made, as well as the $1,000.00 which was agreed upon as liquidated damages in the event of a breach. The trial court awarded appellant $1,000.00 by way of liquidated damages.

Appellant may not recover actual damages and also liquidated damages. How much, if anything, would remain out of a sale of the real estate after payment of the liens against the realty was not proved. But when damages are estimated in advance and liquidated by agreement, actual damages can not also -be recovered. Huffhines v. Bourland, Tex.Com.App., 280 S.W. 561; Smith v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 236 S.W.2d 214; Elliot v. Henck, Tex.Civ.App., 223 S.W.2d 292; Blair v. Bird, Tex.Civ.App., 20 S.W.2d 843; McCelvy v. Bell, Tex.Civ.App., 6 S.W.2d 390.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POPE, Justice.

This suit -concerns the right of a -party to recover liquidated damages and also actual damages upon the breach of a contract.

Appellant, Mrs. Eva Jo Allpress, prior to August 9, 1950, claimed that she had made certain improvements on a piece of real estate owned by appellee, Woodrow W. McGill. On that date the two parties entered into a written agreement by which appellee contracted to sell the property and pay appellant the sum of $4,000.00 out of the proceeds. Sin-ce certain liens existed against the property the sale was not made. Appellee sought a declaration of his rights as against appellant and she icross-acted for damages in the amount of $5,000.00. She claimed the sum she would have received had the sale -been made, as well as the $1,000.00 which was agreed upon as liquidated damages in the event of a breach. The trial court awarded appellant $1,000.00 by way of liquidated damages.

Appellant may not recover actual damages and also liquidated damages. How much, if anything, would remain out of a sale of the real estate after payment of the liens against the realty was not proved. But when damages are estimated in advance and liquidated by agreement, actual damages can not also -be recovered. Huffhines v. Bourland, Tex.Com.App., 280 S.W. 561; Smith v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 236 S.W.2d 214; Elliot v. Henck, Tex.Civ.App., 223 S.W.2d 292; Blair v. Bird, Tex.Civ.App., 20 S.W.2d 843; McCelvy v. Bell, Tex.Civ.App., 6 S.W.2d 390.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 S.W.2d 714, 1952 Tex. App. LEXIS 1972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allpress-v-mcgill-texapp-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack