Allison v. The State of Nevada

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMarch 9, 2022
Docket2:22-cv-00329
StatusUnknown

This text of Allison v. The State of Nevada (Allison v. The State of Nevada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allison v. The State of Nevada, (D. Nev. 2022).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 RONALD J. ALLISON, Case No. 2:22-cv-00329-GMN-EJY

4 Plaintiff, ORDER 5 v.

6 THE STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,

7 Defendants.

8 9 I. DISCUSSION 10 On February 22, 2022, Plaintiff, an inmate currently located at Clark County Detention 11 Center, submitted what appears to be a proposed civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF 12 1-1. However, Plaintiff’s submission does not comply with Local Special Rule 2-1. Plaintiff also 13 did not submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402 filing fee in this matter. 14 A. Plaintiff’s Initiating Document. 15 The Court notes that Plaintiff’s document at ECF No. 1-1 does not comply with Local Special 16 Rule 2-1 (“LSR 2-1”). Under LSR 2-1, a civil rights complaint filed by a person who is not 17 represented by an attorney must be submitted on the form provided by the court or must be legible 18 and contain substantially all the information called for by the court’s form. Plaintiff’s complaint 19 does neither. 20 To the extent Plaintiff seeks to certify a potential class of persons who were subjected to the 21 same practices alleged in his Complaint, Plaintiff may not do so. Pro se plaintiffs may only represent 22 themselves; they are prohibited from pursuing claims on behalf of others in a representative capacity. 23 Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664 (9th Cir. 2008) (collecting cases and noting that 24 courts routinely prohibit pro se plaintiffs from representing others); Russell v. United States, 308 25 F.2d 78, 79 (9th Cir. 1962) (“A litigant appearing [pro se] has no authority to represent anyone other 26 27 1 than himself”). Thus, to the extent Plaintiff seeks relief on behalf of a class of similarly situated 2 persons, he cannot do so. Thus, any amendment to Plaintiff’s Complaint must remove requests 3 for relief on behalf of others. 4 B. There is No Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. 5 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and Local Rule LSR 1-2, an inmate seeking to commence a 6 civil action may apply to proceed in forma pauperis, which allows the inmate to file the civil action 7 without prepaying the $402 filing fee. To apply for in forma pauperis status, the inmate must submit 8 all three of the following documents to the Court: 9 (1) a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate, on this Court’s 10 approved form (i.e. pages 1 through 3 with the inmate’s two signatures on page 3), 11 (2) a Financial Certificate properly signed by both the inmate and a facility or jail official 12 (i.e. page 4 of this Court’s approved form), and 13 (3) a copy of the inmate’s facility or jail trust fund account statement for the previous 14 six-month period. If Plaintiff has not been at the facility a full six-month period, Plaintiff 15 must still submit an inmate account statement for the dates he has been present at the facility. 16 II. ORDER 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send to Plaintiff the approved 18 form for filing a § 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and a copy of his original document at 19 ECF No. 1-1. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff will have until on or before May 9, 2022 to submit 21 a complaint in compliance with LSR 2-1. Plaintiff is reminded that any amendment to Plaintiff’s 22 Complaint must remove requests for relief on behalf of others. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will also send Plaintiff the approved 24 form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, as well as the document entitled 25 information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

26 27 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before May 9, 2022, Plaintiff will either pay the 2 $402 filing fee for a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $52 administrative fee) 3 or file with the Court: 4 (1) a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate on this Court’s 5 approved form (i.e. pages 1 through 3 of the form with the inmate’s two signatures on page 6 3), 7 (2) a Financial Certificate properly signed by both the inmate and a facility or jail official 8 (i.e. page 4 of this Court’s approved form), and 9 (3) a copy of the inmate’s facility or jail trust fund account statement for the previous 10 six-month period. If Plaintiff has not been at the facility a full six-month period, Plaintiff 11 must still submit an inmate account statement for the dates he has been present at the facility. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff does not file a complaint in compliance with 13 LSR 2-1 and a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with all three documents or pay 14 the $402 filing fee for a civil action on or before May 9, 2022, the Court will recommend dismissal 15 of this action without prejudice for Plaintiff to refile the case with the Court, under a new case 16 number, when Plaintiff is able to file a complaint in compliance with LSR 2-1, has all three 17 documents needed to file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pays the $402 filing 18 fee. 19 20 DATED this 9th day of March, 2022. 21

23 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.
546 F.3d 661 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Greenville Banking & Trust Co. v. Selcow
25 F.2d 78 (Third Circuit, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allison v. The State of Nevada, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-the-state-of-nevada-nvd-2022.