Allison v. The Employees of Stien Hospital

Opinion

* * *

RONALD J. ALLISON, Case No. 2:21-cv-01401-RFB-EJY

Plaintiff, ORDER v.

Defendants.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] of the Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered August 26, 2022. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by September 9, 2022. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. // 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] 1s ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this Court’s March 9, 2022 Order. DATED: October 3, 2022 .

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II g United States District Judge 1]

-2-