Allison v. The Employees of Stien Hospital
This text of Allison v. The Employees of Stien Hospital (Allison v. The Employees of Stien Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 RONALD J. ALLISON, Case No. 2:21-cv-01401-RFB-EJY
4 Plaintiff, ORDER 5 v.
6 EMPLOYEES OF STEIN HOSPITAL,
7 Defendant.
8 9 On July 27, 2021, Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of Stein Forensics Unit, submitted a 10 civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1-1. However, Plaintiff’s submission does 11 not comply with Local Special Rule 2-1. 12 A. Plaintiff’s Initiating Document. 13 The Court notes that Plaintiff’s document at ECF No. 1-1 does not comply with Local Special 14 Rule 2-1 (“LSR 2-1”). Under LSR 2-1, a civil rights complaint filed by a person who is not 15 represented by an attorney must be submitted on the form provided by the court or must be legible 16 and contain substantially all the information called for by the court’s form. Plaintiff’s complaint 17 does neither. 18 To the extent Plaintiff seeks to certify a potential class of persons who were subjected to the 19 same practices alleged in his Complaint, Plaintiff may not do so. Pro se plaintiffs may only represent 20 themselves; they are prohibited from pursuing claims on behalf of others in a representative capacity. 21 Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664 (9th Cir. 2008) (collecting cases and noting that 22 courts routinely prohibit pro se plaintiffs from representing others); Russell v. United States, 308 23 F.2d 78, 79 (9th Cir. 1962) (“A litigant appearing [pro se] has no authority to represent anyone other 24 than himself”). Thus, to the extent Plaintiff seeks relief on behalf of a class of similarly situated 25 persons, he cannot do so. Thus, any amendment to Plaintiff’s Complaint must remove requests 26 for relief on behalf of others. 27 1 B. There is No Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. 2 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and Local Rule LSR 1-2, an inmate seeking to commence a 3 civil action may apply to proceed in forma pauperis, which allows the inmate to file the civil action 4 without prepaying the $402 filing fee. To apply for in forma pauperis status, the inmate must submit 5 all three of the following documents to the Court: 6 (1) a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate, on this Court’s 7 approved form (i.e. pages 1 through 3 with the inmate’s two signatures on page 3), 8 (2) a Financial Certificate properly signed by both the inmate and a facility or jail official 9 (i.e. page 4 of this Court’s approved form), and 10 (3) a copy of the inmate’s facility or jail trust fund account statement for the previous 11 six-month period. If Plaintiff has not been at the facility a full six-month period, Plaintiff 12 must still submit an inmate account statement for the dates he has been present at the facility. 13 II. ORDER 14 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send to Plaintiff 15 the approved form for filing a § 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and a copy of his original 16 document at ECF No. 1-1. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERD that Plaintiff shall have until on or before May 9, 2022 to submit 18 a complaint to the Court in compliance with LSR 2-1. Plaintiff is reminded that any amendment 19 to Plaintiff’s Complaint must remove requests for relief on behalf of others. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff the approved 21 form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, as well as the document entitled 22 information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before May 9, 2022, Plaintiff shall either pay the 24 $402 filing fee for a civil action (which includes the $350 filing fee and the $52 administrative fee) 25 or file with the Court:
26 27 1 (1) a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis for Inmate on this Court’s 2 approved form (i.e. pages 1 through 3 of the form with the inmate’s two signatures on page 3 3), 4 (2) a Financial Certificate properly signed by both the inmate and a facility or jail official 5 (i.e. page 4 of this Court’s approved form), and 6 (3) a copy of the inmate’s facility or jail trust fund account statement for the previous 7 six-month period. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff does not file a complaint in compliance with 9 LSR 2-1 and a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with all three documents or pay 10 the $402 filing fee for a civil action on or before May 9, 2022, the Court will recommend dismissal 11 of this case without prejudice for Plaintiff to refile the case with the Court, under a new case 12 number, when Plaintiff is able to file a complaint in compliance with LSR 2-1, has all three 13 documents needed to file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pays the $402 filing 14 fee. 15 16 DATED this 9th day of March, 2022.
18 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Allison v. The Employees of Stien Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-the-employees-of-stien-hospital-nvd-2022.