Allison v. Halfacre

11 Iowa 450
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedApril 11, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 11 Iowa 450 (Allison v. Halfacre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allison v. Halfacre, 11 Iowa 450 (iowa 1861).

Opinion

Lowe, C. J.

No evidence whatever has been certified up with the record in this ease; in the absence of which we must presume that the judgment of the court was a just’ response thereto. Whether the questions of law raised in this court were presented and passed upon by the court below, we have no means of determining from the record. If it should be said that this is a chancery case, and that questions going to the equity of the bill may be insisted upon at the hearing as well as by demurrer, then they should be limited to the facts presented in the petition, and not confounded with those arising upon the evidence.

In the present condition of the record there is” but one question, perhaps, which it would be proper for us to pas3.. upon; and this relates to the alledged invalidity of the acts ; of the Legislature granting pre-emption rights to swamp lands. The point made as we understand it, is, that these-, pre-emption acts were passed anterior to the time when the., swamp lands were patented to the State by the general government, and were on that account an unlawful interference with the primary disposal of the soil by the United States. The objection proceeds upon the idea that the title to these., lands is not vested in the State by the act of Congres3 granting them, but by the subsequent selection and patenting of the same. This is simply a mistake. The act granting,’ the swamp lands operates ex proprio viyore to pass the title ’ [452]*452at once. The subsequent selection and patenting is required for the purpose of fixing their location and description.

The judgment below is aifirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hays v. McCormick
49 N.W. 69 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1891)
Wells v. Pennington County
48 N.W. 305 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)
Snell v. Dubuque & Sioux City Railway Co.
42 N.W. 588 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1889)
Miller v. Tobin
16 P. 161 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1887)
Wright v. Roseberry
121 U.S. 488 (Supreme Court, 1887)
State v. Portsmouth Savings Bank
7 N.E. 379 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
Matthews v. Goodrich
1 N.E. 175 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Hamilton v. Shoaff
99 Ind. 63 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
State v. Sioux City & Pacific Railroad
7 Neb. 357 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1878)
C. R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Brown
40 Iowa 333 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1875)
Busch v. Donohue
31 Mich. 481 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1875)
Gaston v. Stott
5 Or. 48 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1873)
Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. Smith
41 Mo. 310 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1867)
Fremont County v. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad
22 Iowa 91 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1867)
Barrett v. Brooks
21 Iowa 144 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1866)
Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. Hayne
19 Iowa 137 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Iowa 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-halfacre-iowa-1861.