Allina Health System v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama
DecidedSeptember 16, 2025
Docket2:25-cv-01596
StatusUnknown

This text of Allina Health System v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (Allina Health System v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allina Health System v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, (N.D. Ala. 2025).

Opinion

2025 Sep-12 AM 1 U.S. DISTRICT CO N.D, OF ALAB

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ‘

IN RE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 2406

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —47)

On December 12, 2012, the Panel transferred 2 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, See 908 F.Supp.2d 1373 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 84 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Norther District of Alabama. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Alabama and assigned to Judge Proctor. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Alabama for the reasons stated in the order of December 12, 2012, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. , This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7~day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.’

perdg atiotno, ie FOR THE PANEL: ‘ stay i . Sep 11, 2026 Ui Agel srarea . MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION James Vv. Ingold Clerk of the Panel

“eae wh > ELS" TRUE Sg 2 Neal

&)

ee Se OEE eESyEEE—E—E——e_ ee eT ee ee ee Se 2 BE ee ee ee eee 2 Be SSE - INRE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST . LITIGATION MDL No. 2406

SCHEDULE CTO-47 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST _—COD'’Y. CANO. CASE CAPTION \

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN Allina Health System et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield CAN 5 . 25~06549 Association et al ‘ ILLINOISNORTHERN . . Texas Health Resources v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield . ILN 1 2508320 Association et al PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN ,

HARVARD MEDICAL FACULTY PHYSICIANS AT PAE 2 25-03916 BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER, INC. . etal v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation
908 F. Supp. 2d 1373 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allina Health System v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allina-health-system-v-blue-cross-blue-shield-association-alnd-2025.