Alliance for Disabled in Action, Inc. v. Continental Properties & Edison Tyler Villages, L.L.C.
885 A.2d 952, 185 N.J. 331, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1484
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Wefing’s written opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 371 N.J.Super. 398, 853 A.2d 328 (2004).
For affirmance—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERA-SOTO—7.
Opposed—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alliance for Disabled in Action, Inc. v. Continental Properties & Edison Tyler Villages, L.L.C., 885 A.2d 952, 185 N.J. 331, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1484 (N.J. 2005).
885 A.2d 952 (Alliance for Disabled in Action, Inc. v. Continental Properties & Edison Tyler Villages, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garden Howe Urban Renewal Associates, L.L.C. v. Hacbmarchitects Engineers Planners, L.L.C. and Del-Sano Contracting Corp.
110 A.3d 82 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2015)
Rosenstein v. State
105 A.3d 1140 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)
Hetty Rosenstein, Labor Co-Chairperson of the State Health Benefits Plan Design Committee and Charles Wowkanech, President, New Jersey State Afl-Cio v. State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, Division of Pensions and Benefits
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014
Nordstrom v. Lyon
35 A.3d 710 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2012)
Roa v. Roa
955 A.2d 930 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2008)
FIRST MONTCLAIR PARTNER v. Herod
885 A.2d 952 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)