Alley v. Davis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Alley v. Davis

166 S.E. 640, 175 Ga. 899, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 360

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1932·No. No. 9004·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. Under the allegations of the petition the court did not err in overruling the demurrer and in refusing to dismiss the action.

2. Neither was there error in continuing the temporary restraining order in force until further order of the court. Hines v. Lavant, 158 Ga. 336 (5) (123 S. E. 611). And see Dixon v. Monroe, 112 Ga. 158 (37 S. E. 180). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

1. Under the allegations of the petition the court did not err in overruling the demurrer and in refusing to dismiss the action.

2. Neither was there error in continuing the temporary restraining order in force until further order of the court. Hines v. Lavant, 158 Ga. 336 (5) (123 S. E. 611). And see Dixon v. Monroe, 112 Ga. 158 (37 S. E. 180). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Alley v. Davis, 166 S.E. 640, 175 Ga. 899, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 360 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

166 S.E. 640 (Alley v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related