Alleva v. Maryland Casualty Co.
This text of 248 A.D. 599 (Alleva v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cross-motions by the parties for summary judgment in an action by a subcontractor to recover on a bond under the provisions of title 40, section 270, United States Code, commonly known as the “ Heard Law.” Order dismissing the complaint and granting summary judgment for the defendant affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The remedy given to plaintiff by the statute must be strictly followed through an action in the Federal court in the district where the contract was performed. This prescribed remedy was not followed by the plaintiff. The courts of this State have no jurisdiction of this action. (People v. Metropolitan Surety Co., 211 N. Y. 107.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alleva-v-maryland-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1936.