Alleva v. Maryland Casualty Co.

248 A.D. 599
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Cross-motions by the parties for summary judgment in an action by a subcontractor to recover on a bond under the provisions of title 40, section 270, United States Code, commonly known as the “ Heard Law.” Order dismissing the complaint and granting summary judgment for the defendant affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The remedy given to plaintiff by the statute must be strictly followed through an action in the Federal court in the district where the contract was performed. This prescribed remedy was not followed by the plaintiff. The courts of this State have no jurisdiction of this action. (People v. Metropolitan Surety Co., 211 N. Y. 107.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alleva v. Maryland Casualty Co., 248 A.D. 599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 599 (Alleva v. Maryland Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gifford-Wood Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
42 Misc. 2d 962 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Gypsum Contractors, Inc. v. American Surety Company
181 A.2d 174 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)
United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
297 F.2d 665 (Second Circuit, 1962)