Allen v. United States
Opinion
Jfn tbe Wniteb �tates
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WALTER ALLEN, * * Plaintiff, * * V. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ORDER
On August 26, 2019, Walter Allen filed a complaint in this court. The complaint is lengthy and difficult to follow, but it seems to concern a domestic dispute between Mr. Allen and his spouse. The Court has carefully reviewed his complaint and Mr. Allen does not make any claims concerning the United States government. Under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491, this court's jurisdiction is limited to certain actions against the United States seeking money damages which do not sound in tort. As Mr. Allen's claim is not against the United States, and he has not identified any basis for jurisdiction, such as a money-mandating statute or federal contract, see United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 216-18 (1983), it is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The Clerk shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Semor Judge
7018 0040 0001 1393 1365
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allen v. United States (Allen v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.