Allen v. Stephens

29 S.E. 443, 102 Ga. 596, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 655
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 10, 1897·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. As a general rule, “where a right depends upon some condition or contingency, the cause of action accrues and the statute runs-only from the fulfilment of the condition or contingency.”, This is true because “it is a general rule of law that if a plaintiff sues on a cause of action, he must recover, once for all, all damages incident to it, past, present and future, certain or contingent.” 13 Am. & Eng. Ene. L. pp. 720-721, 722-723.

2. Accordingly, where a party’s right to recover a greater or less fractional part of a sum of money in the hands of another depended upon whether a widow did or did not marry before she died, he was not bound to sue until she either married or died, and therefore the statute of limitations did not begin to run against him until the happening of one or the other-of these events. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Stephens, 29 S.E. 443, 102 Ga. 596, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 655 (Ga. 1897).

29 S.E. 443 (Allen v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodman v. Independent Life & Accident Insurance
397 S.E.2d 56 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Brandwein v. Greenfield
122 S.E.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Central Bank & Trust Corp. v. State
76 S.E. 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Houser v. Farmers' Supply Co.
64 S.E. 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Busby v. Marshall
54 S.E. 646 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
State ex rel. Cardin v. McClellan
113 Tenn. 616 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1904)
Allen v. Stephens
33 S.E. 651 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Atlanta Elevator Co. v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills
32 S.E. 541 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)