Allen v. State
878 S.W.2d 930, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1181, 1994 WL 371891
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Cornell Allen, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allen v. State, 878 S.W.2d 930, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1181, 1994 WL 371891 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
878 S.W.2d 930 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.