Allen v. State
861 S.W.2d 201, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1442, 1993 WL 360824
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24-035 motion as untimely. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).
Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided a memorandum to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allen v. State, 861 S.W.2d 201, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1442, 1993 WL 360824 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
861 S.W.2d 201 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.