Allen v. State

755 So. 2d 173, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3384, 2000 WL 294436
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 703 So. 2d 1162
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 2000·No. No. 2D99-4349·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dave Milton Allen appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Allen’s petition for failure to comply with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(c). See Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1999) (amending rule 3.850 to include coram nobis relief). Our affirmance is without prejudice for Allen to file a rule 3.850 motion that complies with those requirements.

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and GREEN and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 755 So. 2d 173, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3384, 2000 WL 294436 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

755 So. 2d 173 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. State
750 So. 2d 592 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)