Allen v. State

710 So. 2d 225, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5226, 1998 WL 233298
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 1998·No. No. 97-1754·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bobby James Allen appeals the denial of his 3.850 motion. We remand with directions that the trial court either resentence Mr. Allen in accordance with the plea agreement or allow Mr. Allen the opportunity to withdraw his plea. See Eggers v. State, 624 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (“[T]he trial court must apprise the defendant that the period of incarceration specified in the plea agreement will be followed by a period of probation, if such is the court’s intent.”); Jefferson v. State, 515 So.2d 407, 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

ERVIN, BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 710 So. 2d 225, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5226, 1998 WL 233298 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

710 So. 2d 225 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spacco v. State
739 So. 2d 1269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)