Allen v. State

751 So. 2d 56, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2470, 1999 WL 111163
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 1999
DocketNo. 99-199
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 751 So. 2d 56 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. State, 751 So. 2d 56, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2470, 1999 WL 111163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Allen petitions for a writ of habeas corpus seeking a belated appeal. He argues his appellate counsel was ineffective for having failed to argue on appeal that the trial court illegally enhanced1 his conviction for second degree-murder with a firearm to a life felony. We find no merit or support for Allen’s argument. See Hogan v. State, 719 So.2d 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Further this petition is improper because it is successive to Allen’s direct appeal2 and his prior motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.850,3 both of which sought to attack his sentence.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus DENIED.

GRIFFIN., CJ., W. SHARP, and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonald v. State
751 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
751 So. 2d 56, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2470, 1999 WL 111163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.