Allen v. Railroad
This text of 53 S.E. 866 (Allen v. Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s evidence was to the effect that the intestate walked on the railroad crossing and was killed by the defendant’s train, and that the intestate at a point 20 yards from the crossing, by simply looking, could have seen down the railroad 200 yards in the direction from which the train approached. The testimony of the plaintiff further showed that the intestate did not look, listen or turn her head, and was paying no attention to the train. On this testimony, the court was clearly correct in giving an adverse intimation as to the plaintiff’s right to recover.
No Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 S.E. 866, 141 N.C. 340, 1906 N.C. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-railroad-nc-1906.