Allen v. Department of Mental Health

Michigan Court of Appeals

Allen v. Department of Mental Health

261 N.W.2d 247, 79 Mich. App. 170, 1977 Mich. App. LEXIS 849

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 11, 1977

DocketDocket 29950

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 261 N.W.2d 247 (Allen v. Department of Mental Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. Department of Mental Health, 261 N.W.2d 247, 79 Mich. App. 170, 1977 Mich. App. LEXIS 849 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs brought a wrongful death action in the Court of Claims alleging negligence by defendants’ employees in allowing plaintiffs’ decedent to be temporarily released from a state mental health facility. Plaintiffs’ decedent committed suicide while on a temporary visit to his parents’ home. The Court of Claims granted defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment, grounded on sovereign immunity, MCLA 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107). Plaintiffs appeal as of right.

A majority of the Michigan Supreme Court recently held that the proper inquiry in a case such as this is whether the activity has been treated as a "governmental function” by the case law at the time of enactment of 1970 PA 155 (MCLA 691.1407 et seq; MSA 3.996(107) et seq.), Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1; 247 NW2d 530 (1976). Prior case law has uniformly treated operation of a public hospital as a "governmental function”. See White v Detroit, 74 Mich App 545; 254 NW2d 572 (1977), and Snow v Freeman, 55 Mich App 84; 222 NW2d 43 (1974). In the instant case, plaintiffs’ allegations of tortious activity: employing incompetent personnel, granting a patient with suicidal tendencies temporary release for visits with his parents, failing to supervise the activities of the patient while on the temporary visit, and failing to instruct the parents of the patient in the care and treatment of the patient while on temporary visit, all relate to the exercise or discharge of a governmental function. Plaintiff has failed to "plead facts in the complaint, in avoidance of immunity”. McCann v State of Michi[173]*173gan, 398 Mich 65, 77, 80; 247 NW2d 521 (1976), Ryan, J., concurring. Therefore, the "specific tortious activity alleged against the state or its agencies” is within the protection of the immunity doctrine.

Plaintiffs contend that MCLA 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107) is unconstitutional. The Michigan Supreme Court has recently had an opportunity to consider that issue and has declined to hold the statute unconstitutional, Thomas, supra, McCann, supra, and Pittman v City of Taylor, 398 Mich 41; 247 NW2d 512 (1976). We decline as well.

Affirmed. No costs, a public question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs brought a wrongful death action in the Court of Claims alleging negligence by defendants’ employees in allowing plaintiffs’ decedent to be temporarily released from a state mental health facility. Plaintiffs’ decedent committed suicide while on a temporary visit to his parents’ home. The Court of Claims granted defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment, grounded on sovereign immunity, MCLA 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107). Plaintiffs appeal as of right.

A majority of the Michigan Supreme Court recently held that the proper inquiry in a case such as this is whether the activity has been treated as a "governmental function” by the case law at the time of enactment of 1970 PA 155 (MCLA 691.1407 et seq; MSA 3.996(107) et seq.), Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1; 247 NW2d 530 (1976). Prior case law has uniformly treated operation of a public hospital as a "governmental function”. See White v Detroit, 74 Mich App 545; 254 NW2d 572 (1977), and Snow v Freeman, 55 Mich App 84; 222 NW2d 43 (1974). In the instant case, plaintiffs’ allegations of tortious activity: employing incompetent personnel, granting a patient with suicidal tendencies temporary release for visits with his parents, failing to supervise the activities of the patient while on the temporary visit, and failing to instruct the parents of the patient in the care and treatment of the patient while on temporary visit, all relate to the exercise or discharge of a governmental function. Plaintiff has failed to "plead facts in the complaint, in avoidance of immunity”. McCann v State of Michi[173]*173gan, 398 Mich 65, 77, 80; 247 NW2d 521 (1976), Ryan, J., concurring. Therefore, the "specific tortious activity alleged against the state or its agencies” is within the protection of the immunity doctrine.

Plaintiffs contend that MCLA 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107) is unconstitutional. The Michigan Supreme Court has recently had an opportunity to consider that issue and has declined to hold the statute unconstitutional, Thomas, supra, McCann, supra, and Pittman v City of Taylor, 398 Mich 41; 247 NW2d 512 (1976). We decline as well.

Affirmed. No costs, a public question.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 N.W.2d 247, 79 Mich. App. 170, 1977 Mich. App. LEXIS 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-department-of-mental-health-michctapp-1977.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack