Allen Hendric Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Allen Hendric Robinson v. State

DecidedJune 11, 2025

DocketA25D0410

StatusPublished

This text of Allen Hendric Robinson v. State (Allen Hendric Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen Hendric Robinson v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 11, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25D0410. ALLEN HENDRIC ROBINSON v. THE STATE.

In 2013, Allen Hendric Robinson was convicted of various crimes, including rape, false imprisonment, and aggravated assault. This Court affirmed his conviction in an unpublished opinion. See Robinson v. State, Case No. A17A1347 (May 10, 2017). Robinson filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, arguing that the DNA which was collected in his case was not tested properly. The trial court denied Robinson’s motion on April 14, 2025. Robinson filed a discretionary application challenging the trial court’s order. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Pretermitting the issue of whether the application was timely,1 Robinson’s application is barred because the issues he raises have or could have been litigated in his prior appeal. See Ross v. State, 310 Ga. App. 326, 327 (713 SE2d 438) (2011) (“[A]ny issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is binding on this Court . . . .”) (citation and punctuation omitted). Our decision, which specifically discussed the DNA evidence, is the law of the case; Robinson is not entitled to relitigate this issue. See Echols v. State, 243 Ga. App. 775, 776 (534 SE2d 464) (2000) (“It is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum. The same is true of appeals of the same issue on the same grounds”) (punctuation omitted); Jackson v. State, 273 Ga. 320, 320 (540 SE2d 612) (2001) (a party “is not

1 Though Robinson’s certificate of service is dated May 14, 2025, his application is postmarked May 15. See Court of Appeals Rule 4 (c). entitled to another bite at the apple by way of a second appeal”). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/11/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 11, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25D0410. ALLEN HENDRIC ROBINSON v. THE STATE.

In 2013, Allen Hendric Robinson was convicted of various crimes, including rape, false imprisonment, and aggravated assault. This Court affirmed his conviction in an unpublished opinion. See Robinson v. State, Case No. A17A1347 (May 10, 2017). Robinson filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, arguing that the DNA which was collected in his case was not tested properly. The trial court denied Robinson’s motion on April 14, 2025. Robinson filed a discretionary application challenging the trial court’s order. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Pretermitting the issue of whether the application was timely,1 Robinson’s application is barred because the issues he raises have or could have been litigated in his prior appeal. See Ross v. State, 310 Ga. App. 326, 327 (713 SE2d 438) (2011) (“[A]ny issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is binding on this Court . . . .”) (citation and punctuation omitted). Our decision, which specifically discussed the DNA evidence, is the law of the case; Robinson is not entitled to relitigate this issue. See Echols v. State, 243 Ga. App. 775, 776 (534 SE2d 464) (2000) (“It is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum. The same is true of appeals of the same issue on the same grounds”) (punctuation omitted); Jackson v. State, 273 Ga. 320, 320 (540 SE2d 612) (2001) (a party “is not

1 Though Robinson’s certificate of service is dated May 14, 2025, his application is postmarked May 15. See Court of Appeals Rule 4 (c). entitled to another bite at the apple by way of a second appeal”). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/11/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Allen Hendric Robinson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-hendric-robinson-v-state-gactapp-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack