Allen ex rel. Pepperday v. Oxnard

25 A. 568, 152 Pa. 621, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1028
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 159·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find no error in distributing the money to the mechanics’ liens. The mortgage in favor of J. J. Pepperday was not filed until more than sixty days from its execution, and after the mechanics’ liens had attached. This answers the first and second specifications of error. The third does not conform to the rules of court and will not be considered. The fourth specification alleges that the court below erred in allowing interest on the liens to the day of distribution. This was doubtless an oversight, and would have been corrected in the court below had the attention of the learned judge been called to it. The interest should have been allowed only to time of sale.

With this modification the decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen ex rel. Pepperday v. Oxnard, 25 A. 568, 152 Pa. 621, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1028 (Pa. 1893).

25 A. 568 (Allen ex rel. Pepperday v. Oxnard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brubacher Excavating, Inc. v. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A.
995 A.2d 362 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
Brubacher Excavating Inc. v. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg N.A.
7 Pa. D. & C.5th 173 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 2008)
Courshon v. Milesburg Inn
2 Pa. D. & C.3d 726 (Centre County Court of Common Pleas, 1977)
Grigg's Estate
54 Pa. D. & C. 25 (Montgomery County Orphans' Court, 1945)
Roos v. Silk Mills (B. Co. Tr. Co.)
19 A.2d 137 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Niland v. Gill
99 Pa. Super. 107 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)